“He only has four or five races where he can win...” – Tom Boonen warns Wout van Aert is reducing his chances of Spring success by skipping E3
Cycling
Wout van Aert’s decision to skip the E3 Saxo Classic has already been framed as a calculated move towards the Tour of Flanders and Paris-Roubaix. But not everyone is convinced the trade-off works in his favour.
Speaking on the Wielerclub Wattage podcast, Tom Boonen questioned whether removing one of the spring’s key cobbled tests is a risk rather than an advantage, particularly given how limited Van Aert’s true winning opportunities are across the Classics.
“I think it’s a shame he’s not starting. In reality, he only has four or five races where he can really take a win. If you skip one of them, you simply reduce your chances of winning.”
That argument cuts against the strategy set out by Team Visma | Lease a Bike, who have opted to prioritise preparation over racing volume in the wake of Milano-Sanremo. Van Aert had already built his programme around a taper into Sanremo, followed by a training block aimed squarely at peaking for the Monuments.
A missed reference point?
For Boonen, the absence of E3 is not just about losing a chance to win, but about removing one of the clearest indicators of form ahead of the Tour of Flanders. “It’s no secret that I always liked riding E3, but then we would have really known where he stands.”
That perspective reflects the race’s place in the calendar. E3 Saxo Classic has long been seen as the closest simulation of the demands riders will face in Flanders, both in terms of terrain and intensity.
Boonen even suggested that if something had to give in the schedule, another race would have made more sense to sacrifice. “I would rather skip Gent-Wevelgem, now In Flanders Fields. That race is less relevant for him in the build-up to the Tour of Flanders.”
Wout van Aert at Tirreno-Adriatico 2026
Doubts from within his own circle
Boonen is not alone in his view. Jan Bakelants, a close friend and training partner of Van Aert, also admitted the decision is difficult to understand, particularly given the Belgian’s history in the race.
“Apparently, it was decided a long time ago, but I don’t really understand it either. I think it’s a strange decision, because E3 is a very meaningful race to see where he really stands. He has also already won it twice.”
That point underlines the tension at the heart of the debate. On one side sits a controlled, long-term approach designed to maximise peak performance in Flanders and Roubaix. On the other is the value of racing itself, both as a benchmark and as an opportunity.
A calculated gamble before the Monuments
Van Aert’s form is not in question. His ride at Milano-Sanremo, where he recovered from a crash to finish on the podium, confirmed that he is already operating at a high level. But the decision to step away from E3 removes one of the final competitive tests before the biggest races of his spring.
Instead, his build-up will continue through a more selective schedule, balancing racing with targeted training in the days leading into Flanders and Roubaix.
Whether that approach sharpens him or leaves unanswered questions will only become clear once the Monuments arrive. For now, as Boonen’s warning suggests, the choice carries both intent and risk in equal measure.
Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- A very true statement made by Johan Bruyneel: "We don’t know for sure about Jonas, because he dropped out of the Tour de France, but he would never have come close to Pogacar. Maybe he would have finished second. He won the Giro in dominant fashion and the Vuelta the year before, but Visma wants to win the Tour." That's exactly what I've been saying the last six months. If Pogi races with Jonas, the most he can be is second... UNLESS... Pogi crashes out or makes a BIG mistake, which is not likely to happen. Either Bruyneel thinks the way I do or he reads my posts. Ad acta!!!PogiSloFans13-11-2026
- TADEJ POGAČAR !!! "Anatomy of a G.O.A.T." OK, that's great!!! I've been saying all along: Tadej Pogačar-Pogi is the G.O.A.T... period. Not only in cycling... but he's the greatest sportsman that ever lived !!! But let's take a look of what real foolishness looks like: We have many many fools, also on this site, saying that Pogi is "boring,"... he's making cycling "boring"??? I can't believe what's comming out of their deteriorating smelly mouths. So I guess Merckx, Hinault, Indurain, Fasto Coppi and Anquetil were also boring!?!? I guess Michael Jordan, Le Bron, Gretzky, Messi, Ronaldo, Shumacher, Novak Džoković, Federer, Rossi, Marquez, Phelps, Michaela Shiffrin, Venus Williams, Bolt, Lewis Hamilton... etc. were all boring. PS: Many cycling "fans" that think that way, have to get a brain scan. Ad acta!!!PogiSloFans13-11-2026
- Ayuso has had enough time. He's always going to be a mediocre to good cyclist... nothing special or astonishing. But he does have many excuses, just like Remco, but Remco delivers good wins on occasions, Ayuso doesn't. Ad acta!!!PogiSloFans13-11-2026
- I agree, Johan Bruyneel made big mistakes, he was involved in the biggest doping scandal in the history of sports... BUT NEVERTHELESS... Bruyneels analysis on bike racing and cyclists is among the best. That's a fact... period!!! I love listening to Spencer Martin and Johan on WEDU-THE MOVE PODCAST, but I don't care about Armstrong and Hincapie. They are both american bull shi***s who like to exaggerate and talk nonsense.PogiSloFans13-11-2026
- the headline is poorly written too. it makes it sound like their plan is to simply wait until he stops.mij13-11-2026
- It doesnt take a genius to understand that Pogi is 1 level above and Pogi is younger that Jonas, so Jonas will not win under ordinary circumstances. Pogi has to crack hard for Jonas to win. It doesn't matter whether you defend Jonas or not , facts remain facts. Jonas himself says his numbers are better than 2022/2023, so Jonas is more or less optimized and we are just see the stochastic variation due to other factors. I think he will retire along with Pedersen in WC denmarkabstractengineer13-11-2026
- They only raced each other during the 2026 Tour, but here's a few metrics to look at. Stage 3 (Granollers to Les Angles): Pogačar won the stage, finishing 2 seconds ahead of Vingegaard (2nd). Del Toro finished 24 seconds behind Stage 6 (Pau to Gavarnie-Gedre / Col du Tourmalet): Pogačar won solo, Vingegaard finished 2nd (losing 2:38), and Del Toro finished 3rd (at +2:57, finishing 19 seconds behind Vingegaard). Here, Jonas Vingegaard outclimbed Isaac del Toro by 19 seconds on the mountain stageawp13-11-2026
- your clinging to the past. Jonas was dropped by del toro many times last year and jonas never managed a climbing numers del toro did in dauphine last year -entire year. Trend is also evident theres no discussion your living in the past, its beent he same with jonas for many years now and only developing, meanwhile del toro is rising and developing greatly. This is all obvious stuff and im not even a del toro fan. No point discussing numbers or this i suspect you dont watch much now but rather think its 2022 still cause this aint hard.miguel13-11-2026
- We can go through metrics if you like, Del Toro, who I do admire and support, is not on the same level as Jonas just yet. You will see that in early 2027 if they have any crossover races. I do hope they both race the Giro. You are correct though, Jonas is getting older and will not be able to hand on much longer. I see 2027 as a good year for him. Obviously behind Tadej though.awp13-11-2026
- What wins? Are you LA operating under a pseudonym?mij13-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment