“Everything has been cleared up between Lipowitz and me" - Remco Evenepoel says Red Bull tensions put to bed as team respond to comments
Cycling
Remco Evenepoel is a rider that often wears his heart on his sleeve, and is known for some strong words. Following stage 6 of the Tour de France, his comments on teammate Florian Lipowitz were far from positive, as he had hoped for more support in the arrival to Gavarnie. But the Olympic Champion assures that has been talked out and has been resolved overnight.
The stakes at the Tour are higher than ever and the Belgian rider had a strong day on the bike. On the Col du Tourmalet, Tadej Pogacar went up the road; whilst Jonas Vingegaard was in hot pursuit. Florian Lipowitz was behind, joined by Paul Seixas and Isaac del Toro. The trio were caught by Evenepoel's group on the descent.
But the collaboration in the newly-formed group was far from ideal. Despite having both Red Bull and Lidl-Trek men, alongside Frenchmen Seixas and Lenny Martínez, the group did not cohesively work together on the long but slight-gradient ascent to the finish were the gaps could've been reduced to the riders ahead. Pogacar won time on the climb, instead.
Evenepoel had a strong dash to the line and often took over the pace in the group, also looking to propel others into giving more of their abilities. This was not successful, but when Lipowitz did not do it on the Belgian's request, it hit a nerve.
Evenepoel had the legs, but not the support he wanted
“I asked for a lead-out and I didn’t get it. I think I was rightly angry," he had said in a post-race interview. "In the Vuelta a Catalunya, I rode on the front for thirty kilometers [for him], now I ask him to ride one kilometer on the front and that doesn’t happen. That did make me angry, yes. That needs to be discussed properly tonight.”
According to Evenepoel, at the start of stage 7, this has been resolved: “Everything has been cleared up between Lipowitz and me,” Evenepoel told VTM NIEUWS before the start of stage 7. “We looked back on it in a conversation with everyone, and now we have to move on. What happened yesterday is in the past. It was a snapshot of the race.”
Remco Evenepoel on stage 6 of the 2026 Tour de France
Read also
Dempster explains discussion internal tension and the solution
“Remco was frustrated because he wanted to finish third. That Lipo didn't take over? He was leading before that, but when Remco wanted a lead-out, he couldn't get there," team chief of sports Zak Dempster said when asked about the situation. "It's about fractions of a second. That can happen. But we've had a debrief, and everything is okay again.”
Tensions, specially this early, at the Tour de France can lead to a disruption in the team's dynamics. As it stands, both Evenepoel and Lipowitz appear to have the legs to fight for the podium, a result both have achieved before. But their numerical superiority over most of their rivals provides them an advantage.
Tackling their own personal ambitions honestly is an important part of the current task at hand. "Remco wears his heart on his sleeve. In that 'heat of the moment'. Everyone is human. What is most important to me is how they are together now," Dempster assures. "And how they resolve that internally. That is a constant process of improvement. If you want to compete for top results, that is part of the game at this level."
Dempster confirms also that the team does not see the need to sacrifice one rider for the other, which would actually go against its own ambitions of featuring on the final podium in Paris.
“This was always the plan. This is a strong position to be in. Better two guys at the front than one getting dropped. Of course, it would be a good tactic to stay on Pogacar's wheel, but that doesn't always work. Two is better than one," he concluded.
Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 5visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- as excellent as maga rednecks chloe dygert (and quinn simmons)?Ketterechts09-11-2026
- so what i understand is: i left a comment calling out the endless author CVs for being an unnecessary flex of expertise, and you responded by lecturing me (and others) on discrimination and value systems. hats off to you. you definitely lost me!Ketterechts09-11-2026
- I just love the flood of Americans into the top ranks of world cycling. In addition to being studs on the bike, they all seem to be excellent emissaries for our country.Occam09-11-2026
- ANATOMY OF A G.O.A.T. EDDY MERCKX about TADEJ POGAČAR: Merckx: “He has revived a style of cycling that we had almost forgotten. He is now better than me.” Key statements by Merckx about Pogačar in 2026: - Acknowledging his superiority: This time, Merckx openly admitted, without any subsequent backtracking or reservations, that Pogačar had surpassed him and was now above him. This contrasts with 2024, when he quickly softened his remarks about Pogačar being faster. - The possibility of a historic triple (Giro, Tour and Vuelta): During the July Tour de France (where Pogi claimed his fifth title), Merckx stated that Pogi was the only cyclist in history capable of winning all three Grand Tours (the Giro d'Italia, Tour de France and Vuelta a España) in a single season, provided the conditions were right and he had sufficient team support. - Lack of serious competition: Merckx emphasised that Pogačar has no real rivals in the mountains since 2024, thanks to his extraordinary climbing ability and the fact that he continues to improve despite still being under 28 (he turned 28 in autumn 2026). - Praise for his racing style: Merckx highlighted how Pogačar is bringing back the aggressive, uncompromising spirit of cycling's golden era, when races were not merely about calculated stages and tactical conservatism, but about attacking from long distances. PS: This is not "boring" ... this is called making real history, not only statistical history. Capish?PogiSloFans09-11-2026
- It’s off-season mate, I’m bored and fed up with the mediocrity of people unwilling to provoke change when they admit things aren’t right. What have you done lately to make anyone realise you won’t put up with things? What conversation, are you dictating to me which part of the incident I have to be interested in or telling me other parts are taboo? That’s what I guess the UCI would really like, let them moan, let it blow over for them pass on to the next thing, let’s keep the status quo, let’s try our best not reviewing or revealing anything about decision-making just like every time before, they’re used to it by now so we can take the risk they’ll never give us grief.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- As far as CUTD headlines go this is far from the worst. It helps if you look at it twice and realise it’s a list of descriptions from distinct events. You can’t deny the reality of being a rival if you consider the picture immediately below, frontrunner is unfortunate but I’m guessing this time it’s more a linguistic failure than a clickbaiting opportunity. Just a reminder that this is not an anglo website, for those who find it too tedious to interpret text to get the gist of things which are rarely of great importance (as opposed to eg purposely biaised DOJ extradition translations in order to achieve hidden agendas), there are plenty of anglo cycling websites google can suggest.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Ah, finally someone willing to be a bit proactive.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- So? Do you understand the way instructions, decisions and authority work? Do you think in a football match if after a match (or even after play has gone on) a player tells the referee he did touch the ball with his hands when the referee didn’t award opponents a penalty that they will revise the score or force a replay? You really don’t get my point, it’s not against the rider but everyone here is so emotional for her they can’t get back to an issue which needs resolving for the future and the first step (or maybe second) is to try to understand how and why it happens, none of you have contributed in the least to that. All everyone is interested in is letting everyone know they agree how unjust it was, not even sure anyone thinks that could affect anything.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Shouldn’t you be in MOUrning?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Maybe you don’t like it and that’s fine, we all have different sensibilities and topics that touch us, but as you try to show me, it doesn’t hurt to reflect and compare ourselves to others behaving similarly. What precisely is the difference between a sports fan interested in every detail of his/her hero’s life and a celeb fan having the same hobby? It’s far more interesting to learn and think about how and why (which) people do things than reading about what they are actually doing. And just to add another level, maybe you’ll agree we don’t use the same value system for everyone, we discriminate in an enormous number of systematic ways. For example, when is the last time you saw a discussion arguing about the achievements of two politicians to compare or for that matter two business leaders apart from the comparison of hypothetical wealth accumulated? Perhaps you misunderstood the intention?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
Loading
1 Comments