“As long as it’s not a bone, it’s manageable on the cobbles. But that nail was split, and anyone who's lost a nail knows how painful that can be,"
Van Avermaet told the HLN podcast. "That’s something I really admire about those riders.”
Van der Poel’s race was not lost simply because his hand hurt. The way
Milano-Sanremo was ridden in 2026 mattered just as much.
His brother
David van der Poel offered the clearest explanation of that. “His effort was a lot longer because of the run-in to the Cipressa. Instead of an effort of eight minutes, it became maybe 14 minutes. That’s probably why he came up just short on the Poggio.”
That line matters because it moves the discussion away from the lazy idea that Van der Poel was simply below his best. By David’s account, the numbers did not tell that story at all. “He had to go a bit too deep there, but he said his times and power numbers were similar to last year. That mainly shows that Pogacar was simply faster than last year.”
There has at least been some reassurance that the injury itself may not be severe.
Oliver Naesen, speaking after seeing Van der Poel the next day, suggested there was little sign of anything more serious. “I don’t think it was too bad. The next day at the airport, I saw him, and he just had a normal plaster on it. There was no cast around it. I think it was just a cut.”
That should ease fears of a major setback. But it does not remove the central question. A rider can line up perfectly well and still be compromised once the racing starts, especially in the cobbled Classics, where grip, impact and repeated pressure through the hands matter so much.
That is why Van Avermaet’s point lands. This is not necessarily about absence. It is about discomfort, control and whether a seemingly small problem becomes harder to ignore once the terrain changes.