Latest comments
- You're right, Santiago. And maybe he also wants to capture the victory number 100 (he's very close).
- Doper Horner and his 20/20 race hindsight is still pure rubbish. He's just a 'wannabe be' ex-pro rider who's hanging on to his 2 minutes of fame.
- WVA again???
Why is he on this list?
- We could only hope this clown would try it!
- Obviously some biased reporting - Danish press on Danish rider. The GC field was weak and made even weaker when Ayuso crashed out!
- Yet there you go again. You're wearing your CLOWN suit well!
- So he likes to take a break post-Tour! That's why he doesn't perform to your standards.
- Why write something in detail that can be said in three letters? Everything is clear.
But here's something special for you: when WVA writes that he is going for victory in a race in which he has a 0.001% chance, then it is very funny.
I would have expected that when he saw that Tadej and Mathieu were going to compete, he would announce that he was sick and would not compete.
Is that elaborate enough for even you to understand what I meant?
- I'm sure you 'don't' !
- The article should be "Mathieu van der Poel's 5 biggest rivals in Milano-Sanremo", because in the most predictable and least surprising outcome, it'll be he who triumphs.
I wouldn't rate Tom Pidcock so highly. The only way he can win is with a downhill attack, because he's not winning it in the sprint or on the climb. Yes he's a better descender, but his rivals aren't exactly bad.
Matthew Brennan should be on this list instead. He's more dangerous, especially as Visma have no less that 4 cards (Jørgensen, van Aert, Laporte and Brennan)
Loading