Wout van Aert wants the Giro d'Italia and the Olympic Games. What about the Tour? Is Jumbo-Visma willing to give in?
Cycling
We all know that Wout van Aert is an athlete who loves new challenges, who finds in them a way to motivate himself and grow more as a man and an athlete.
His team, Jumbo Visma, will defend the trident of Grand Tours won this year in 2024, the most important of which is the Tour de France, not only because of the media coverage, but also because of the pressure from sponsors and the team's management, which has Jonas Vingegaard as the rider to take to the final victory in Nice.
Read also
In a year that will be marked by the Olympic Games and where van Aert says he wants to be present, the Tour de France isn't very appealing. Firstly, because now the stages are known and there's a very tough last week, which will leave its mark on the athletes, and secondly because of the short time to recover between races. Let's remember that the Tour de France finishes on July 21, the Olympic Games start on July 26 and the time trials take place the very next day, July 27.
For van Aert, who finished second in the road race in Tokyo, only gold matters and Paris is the goal. If he wants to be on an equal footing with Filippo Ganna, Joshua Tarling or even Remco Evenepoel in the individual time trial, he has to get there physically and mentally fresh. Ganna has already said that he won't take part in the Tour because of the Games, with the observation that Ganna will be doing specific preparation. This is where the Tour of Italy comes into play.
Wout van Aert would like to race the Giro d'Italia. He said so himself earlier this month, during an interview on the eve of the Gravel World Championship. When asked by a Gazzetta dello Sport journalist if he would race the Giro for the first time next year, Van Aert made no secret of his desire: "I hope so," he said. "I'd love to, but it's not just my decision. I also want to race the Vuelta in the future, but if I don't race the Tour, then the Giro is the first race I want to take part in."
Read also
It remains to be seen whether Jumbo-Visma will want to give up one of its riders, considered by many to be the most complete cyclist in the World Tour peloton, the most consistent in the Tour, after Roglic's departure and Nathan van Hooydonck's premature abandonment. Matteo Jorgensen, among others, has come in, but the team will need solidity to carry its leader, Jonas Vingegaard, through to the final stage in Nice. The team can also play a psychological game with Wout, as he has a personal "reckoning" with the 2023 Tour, which didn't go the way he planned and wanted. For the first time in five editions, the "Kempenaar" had to return home without a stage win, abandoning the Tour prematurely so as not to miss the birth of his son Jeronimo.
Let's remember the series of narrow defeats he had - the flying bidon episode in San Sebastian - were indications that there were frustrations and there's no better way to end a hangover than with a stage win. For a rider with Van Aert's qualities, there are possibilities and we're thinking, for example, of the first stage - ironically on Italian soil - which is too difficult for true sprinters, but where Van Aert can certainly survive. Wout van Aert can't just say no to the possibility of wearing the yellow jersey again.
Wout van Aert has a philosophy: "I simply don't have to do anything". It remains to be seen whether the status he has earned through his work will be enough to convince Jumbo-Visma to let him fulfill his wish for 2024: the Giro d'Italia.
Read also
*Article written by Carlos Silva

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 4visitors 3
Top comment
abstractengineer27-10-20233
It is Time
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
Loading
1 Comments









