Visma positive despite Cian Uijtdebroeks suffering another setback: “In the long run it will pay off"
Cycling
Cian Uijtdebroeks' 2025 season has taken another blow, with
Team Visma | Lease a Bike confirming that the 22-year-old Belgian talent will
remain sidelined indefinitely due to persistent physical issues. The promising
climber, who has not raced since mid-April, continues to suffer from a
mysterious injury that causes recurring numbness in his legs, a condition that
has now ruled him out of the Tour de Suisse and likely any Grand Tour
participation this season.
“Last year Cian rode well, until he started having back
problems,” team manager Richard Plugge told Het Laatste Nieuws. “This
year he also struggled with a physical discomfort and he asked us to take a few
weeks of rest, to completely reset. I think that’s fine, because in the long
run it will pay off.”
Read also
The nature of Uijtdebroeks’ condition remains elusive but
increasingly concerning. After a breakthrough 2023 that saw him finish eighth
in the Vuelta a España, expectations were high for his continued rise. But 2024
has delivered only setbacks: a DNF at both the Giro d’Italia and Vuelta a
España, followed by a prolonged absence and now confirmation that he will not
feature in Switzerland or the Tour de France.
Plugge emphasised the importance of long-term development
over short-term pressure, “We have to keep building with him. Some youngsters
fly from the start, like Matthews Brennan. Others take longer to get to their
level.”
Indeed, while Uijtdebroeks won the Tour de l’Avenir in 2022
and was tipped as one of the next generation’s elite climbers, his progress has
stalled through no fault of his own. The Belgian has shown glimpses of his
potential, but with the team choosing caution and recovery over racing, his
comeback will have to wait.
Read also
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment







