“Van Aert played it very well. He knew pulling was a trap” - Bruyneel and Hincapie claim Pogacar played right into rival’s hands at Paris-Roubaix
Cycling
The aftermath of Paris-Roubaix 2026 has centred on how Wout van Aert finally converted his strength into victory, and on The Move podcast, Johan Bruyneel and George Hincapie offered a clear explanation: this was not just about power, but precision.
Up against Tadej Pogacar in the decisive move, Van Aert’s victory was shaped by reading the race correctly when it mattered most.
Chaos from the start as Roubaix explodes early
From the opening kilometres, this was not a typical Paris-Roubaix. Hincapie, speaking from the team car perspective, described a race already on the limit before the cobbles had even begun. “These guys are insane. They’re warriors. What a wild race from this perspective,” he said, before adding: “It was full gas from the start… There was no break. The amount of chaos between riders, directors, and cars is incredible.”
That relentless pace was backed up by Bruyneel’s numbers. “They did the first 100 kilometres in an hour and fifteen minutes… before the cobbles,” he said, a speed that effectively decided the race early. “Half the peloton is eliminated” before the key sectors even arrive.
Read also
Speed driving punctures and reshaping the race
One of the defining features of the 2026 edition was the sheer number of punctures among the favourites. Both analysts pointed to speed as the root cause. “The only explanation I find is that the speed is much higher and it’s harder to pick a line,” Hincapie explained. “You’re going over 50 km/h, you can’t see the rocks or choose your way… they’re hitting them much harder than in training.”
Bruyneel reinforced that point with the data. “48.9 km/h on average. It’s crazy.”
In those conditions, the race became less about avoiding problems and more about when they happened. Tadej Pogacar, Mathieu van der Poel and Van Aert all suffered issues, but the timing of each incident ultimately shaped the outcome.

Wout van Aert overpowered Tadej Pogacar
Arenberg chaos defines the race
As so often, the Trouée d’Arenberg proved decisive. Bruyneel pointed directly to the moment that changed everything: “The turning point was Van der Poel’s mechanical in the Arenberg forest.”
What followed was one of the most unusual scenes of the race. Van der Poel attempted to switch bikes but was unable to ride his team-mate’s machine due to incompatible pedals. Hincapie described the moment in disbelief: “Seeing him get off the bike 50 metres later, walk back… we’d never seen anything like it.”
Bruyneel suggested that the situation could have been handled differently. “In a panic situation… he should have waited for his other team-mate, who couldn’t have been more than 30 seconds away.”
That sequence of events allowed the decisive front group to form, with Van Aert and Pogacar emerging as the strongest.
Read also
Van Aert’s decisive tactical edge over Pogacar
From there, the race became a direct contest between two riders, and it was here that Van Aert’s decision-making stood out. Hincapie explained the key moment: “Van Aert played it perfectly. He knew pulling was a trap, because Pogacar was going to attack him on the cobbles.”
Instead of forcing the race, Van Aert stayed composed. “He just had to hold his wheel.”
Bruyneel also highlighted his positioning and timing. “He was first into Arenberg, the strongest there… and then the one who launched the decisive attack.”
For the former team manager, the conclusion was simple: “A totally deserved win for Van Aert.”
Pogacar left with little room to change the outcome
For Pogacar, there was little criticism from the analysts. “There wasn’t much he could have done differently,” Bruyneel said, pointing instead to the cost of earlier efforts. “He spent a lot of energy on that 20-kilometre chase after the puncture.”
Hincapie added another detail, suggesting the team’s aggressive approach may have played a role. “Maybe they used their teammates too early.”
By the time the race reached its decisive phase, Pogacar was isolated, and the balance had shifted.
Read also
An emotional victory for Van Aert
Beyond tactics, the significance of the victory was clear. Bruyneel noted the emotional response immediately after the finish. “We had never seen him so emotional after a race,” he said, highlighting what Roubaix represents to Van Aert. “There are only two races he lives for: Flanders and Roubaix.”
He also pointed to the personal meaning behind the celebration. “He pointed to the sky for his late former teammate… he always thinks of him in this race.”
For Bruyneel, the impact could be lasting. “This is going to give him his self-belief back. He doubted himself many times.”
Hincapie placed the result in a wider context. “It was perfect for cycling. Seeing another rider win a Monument is incredible.”
A complete Paris-Roubaix
Paris-Roubaix 2026 delivered everything the race is known for: extreme speed, constant chaos and decisive moments that came down to instinct as much as strength. Hincapie summed it up from inside the race convoy. “It’s a completely different experience seeing it from the car… You see the riders’ passion and pain.”
Bruyneel’s conclusion captured the essence of the race. In Roubaix, it is not only the strongest rider who wins, but the one who best navigates the chaos. In 2026, that rider was Wout van Aert.
Read also

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 6visitors 6
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- I think Jonas would have lost the TDF by 4+ minutes (at the least) and might not have even been in the top 3. Too much talent in the younger riders to say anyone not named Pogačar would have been top 3md197503-11-2026
- this is just stupid. you already have 23%, gravel is over the topabstractengineer03-11-2026
- There was once a time when Lance was supremely popular and he used his artificial "It's Not About the Bike: My Journey Back to Life" persona to lead his mob in going after Greg. There was no one Lance did not abuse in protecting his phony hero image. Lance promoted himself as a divine megastar and he let down millions of cancer victims and gullible devotees who clung far too long to the charade. Lance is the epitome of a corrupt person and because of his power, many around him, including business enterprises, succumbed to the evil. All who got in Armstrong's way were mercilessly attacked by him and his minions. This remarkably continues today with a new generation. LeMond was a number one enemy and paid a huge price. Who do you think slandered who?Yepperoni03-11-2026
- You despise him because he calls out the truth....OK clown !frieders303-11-2026
- JV is really slighting himself with not doing the 1 dayers.. 🤷
leedorney02-11-2026 - Watch the interview on youtube. I don't speak French. I do speak English and Spanish and you can hear it in his voice. Years ago LeMond had real personal problems I imagine in no small part because of Armstrong. then Armstrong goes round "full blast" re: LeMond having drinking and drug problems. The same way Andreu was expelled from mainstream cycling so was LeMond. On the positive side the clips of the ride and chatting with old teammates and was good. To seemed like a fun day and experience and good reason brush up his French.atom02-11-2026
- and another no-news article around the ‚2 tokyo jogging rounds‘ headline, this time spiced with some days old ‚news‘ that the LA and japan vacation trips come during or after the tdf route release. i am getting more and more annoyed by this time-stealing no-news crap. but who am i to complain? nobody forces me to come back for more ‚news‘ day after day …Ketterechts02-11-2026
- It would likely be a very steep section of 4.1 km, not changing the average gradient considerably, with the climb remaining 10.1 km at 11.8%. It would reach 20% on the gravel. It would start 1.6 km in, and finish with 4.2 km left to climb (before the short final descent)
Rafionain-Glas02-11-2026 - Welcome to the off-season.
santiagobenites02-11-2026 - guillaume martin in this list is quite a surprise as a gc rider.Ketterechts02-11-2026
Loading
1 Comments









