
The UCI has announced that it will permanently retire the race number 84 in the junior women’s road race at the World Championships, as a tribute to Muriel Furrer, who tragically lost her life following a crash at last year’s event in Zurich.
Furrer, an 18-year-old Swiss rider, crashed during the junior women’s road race on 26 September 2024. The incident occurred on a descent outside Zurich in wet conditions. She suffered a severe head injury after veering off the road into woodland, and though she was swiftly airlifted to Zurich University Hospital, she passed away the following day. Her death sent shockwaves through the cycling community, casting a shadow over what had been the first combined road and para-cycling World Championships.
The circumstances of the crash also raised difficult questions at the time. No television cameras or direct witnesses captured the moment she left the road, and she was not immediately located by race officials. Only later was her position discovered, with emergency services then attending to her and arranging evacuation by helicopter. The lack of immediate visibility heightened concern among riders and officials about safety on technical circuits, especially in poor weather.
Furrer’s loss was felt deeply in Switzerland, where she had been regarded as a rising talent across multiple disciplines. In 2024 she had finished runner-up in both the junior time trial and road race at the national championships, and she was also active in mountain biking and cyclo-cross. Friends and teammates described her as warm-hearted and always smiling, while Swiss Cycling spoke of “immeasurable grief” at losing one of its brightest prospects.
Read also
One year on from the tragedy, UCI President David Lappartient reflected: “The death of Muriel Furrer, a promising young rider with a bright future ahead of her, during our UCI Road and Para-cycling Road World Championships last year cast a shadow of mourning over the event and the entire cycling community. One year later to the day, our thoughts are still with her, her loved ones, and her Federation, Swiss Cycling. To pay tribute to Muriel, the UCI has decided that the race number she wore during the event will no longer be assigned in the Women Junior road race at the UCI World Championships.”
By retiring number 84, the UCI has ensured that Furrer’s name will remain part of the championships in the years to come — a symbolic but permanent reminder of both her talent and the risks faced by young riders chasing their dreams on the world stage.
Read also
The UCI retires Muriel Furrer's race number https://t.co/qtVHLvIWGI pic.twitter.com/GBpcOiFl4A
— UCI_media (@UCI_media) September 26, 2025

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment






