
Tadej Pogacar is set to win the 2025 Tour de France for the
fourth time, sealing his place in cycling history ahead of Jonas Vingegaard.
The final stage today will bring an end to a brutal three-week contest defined
by exhaustion, pressure, and increasing tension, particularly between
Vingegaard’s Team Visma | Lease a Bike and Pogacar’s UAE Team Emirates. Matteo
Jorgenson, a key Visma rider, has battled illness throughout the race but still
fought to be part of the breakaway on Saturday. As tempers frayed and energy
reserves dwindled, he found himself repeatedly trading attacks with UAE’s Tim
Wellens.
Despite the cat-and-mouse battle between the two, both
riders dismissed the idea that personal conflict or team animosity drove their
moves. “I don't know about the beef, I don't think it exists,” Jorgenson told Cycling
Weekly.
“I'm sure it makes for good headlines, but Tim and I... we
just wanted to be in the break clearly today and we showed our cards quite
early. Already to get in the break we used up all our bullets and we didn't
have a lot left because it has been a long Tour, and we've both done a lot for
our teams. In the end, we found ourselves dropped together. There was no
animosity between us."
Wellens echoed that sentiment, saying, “Today was super
hard, the beginning there were maybe 40 riders with all the favourites, and
then we went away again with three riders - myself and Jorgenson and the Arkéa
rider [Ewen Costiou] I don't remember the name of - and we kill ourselves a
little bit to ride in front of the breakaway and then when the final began, I
felt we were pretty tired.”
Read also
Despite what the riders say, there have been many times over
the course of the last three weeks where it appeared the two teams were
irritating each other. From Pogacar chasing down all of Jorgenson’s attacks, to
Wout van Aert having some stern words to say about the world champion on the
rest day, there has undoubtedly been tension. But will that all be laid to rest
now, as the race enters the final day and returns to Paris?
The constant counterattacks between Jorgenson and Wellens
caught attention during yesterday’s stage, but both riders insisted it wasn’t
tactical hostility. “[It was] two defeated men talking, we didn't have much air
to speak in the race so I just wanted to tell him that I wasn't playing games,
and he also wasn't. We were just trying our best,” Jorgenson explained.
“From my side there's no beef,” he added. “We were racing
against each other, but I don't see any beef.”
Read also
Both admitted their strength wasn’t enough to carry them to
the finish. “Wellens and I spent our bullets pretty early, and we never
recovered,” Jorgenson said. “I could tell the whole day that I didn't have the
legs to win, and I could tell that Kaden [Groves] was super strong. I tried to
get ahead early, I knew quite quickly that the legs were not going to come
around. I think the strongest guys made it up there.”
Wellens agreed they were spent before the real finale began.
“The problem was both me and Jorgenson were a little bit à bloc, we had the
same level today but it was difficult. When Jorgenson attacked he put me
totally on the limit, even if he went on the limit himself, that's his
business, but I asked him to hold on and we could work together for the logs,
but I don't think we had the legs to win. When Groves went for it, with a
minute's advantage, that was it.”
Read also
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 2visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- the 'No different than women who follow and discuss celebs through gossip magazines' comment was unfortunately a bit off. didn't you just boast about your principles in the comments section of another article?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- Are you MrMauMau 2.0? Nothing you are saying is really relevant. Vaguely connected, but irrelevant. The conversation is whether Schreiber impeded Brand or not.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment










