"The problem is the difference between Pogacar and the others" - The Tour de France's 'architect' argues that any route would see the World Champion rule
Cycling
The 2026 Tour de France is once again being a 'Poga-show' as the World Champion has won two out of the opening six stages; helped Isaac del Toro to win another and has left the first key block of the race in the yellow jersey. It has happened on a brutal first part of the race, but would've happened in any way, argues Tour de France route designed Thierry Gouvenou.
Gouvenou surprised with the gaps over the Col du Tourmalet
Gouvenou is tasked every year with designing the Tour's route and, with the mountainous sixth day of the race, he didn't expect to see such gaps grow. The stage included the Col d'Aspin, the 17-kilometer long Col du Tourmalet and the slight ascent to the finish at Gavarnie-Gèdre.
On the Tourmalet, UAE Team Emirates - XRG went all out and launched the Slovenian's attack with around 5 kilometers to the summit. From there, he made the winning gap to Jonas Vingegaard. Over the following hour of racing, he extended it to 2:38 minutes on the road to is closest rival.
“We were a little unsure about how difficult Stage 6 would be, because we knew perfectly well that the Tourmalet would be a decisive moment,” Gouvenou said in an interview with TV2. “To be honest, we had not expected such a large gap, and we thought the differences at the finish would be much smaller.”
As the Tour's 'architect', the job is also partly to make for an exciting race, keeping tension high but also delivering routes in which the riders can deliver spectacle from early on. That balance looked ideal throughout the first part of the race, and on the Pyrenean mountain stage he expected the same outcome.
“The spectators would not understand if, for example, we raced through the Pyrenees with a mountain pass that was not too difficult in the middle of the stage and only flat terrain afterwards. We decided to take the route over the Tourmalet and hoped the gap would be smaller. But there was a big difference.”
In Gavarnie, Tadej Pogacar won his second stage at this year's Tour de France
Read also
Even without the Tourmalet, the differences would be made
Hence after six days of racing, the defending champion carried almost three minutes of lead over his closest rival; whilst the rider closing out the Top10 Mathias Vacek already sat over 7 minutes behind in the fight for the yellow jersey.
“As far as the suspense is concerned, you could say it was a failure. But that is also part of cycling.
It has been argued that on social media a different route would make for a tighter race, but Gouvenou can't help but to focus on the bigger picture. "That is simply what Pogacar is like. He is so strong that any route suits him.”
The race is now at full-speed, with a few days for the sprinters following, alongside two hilly stages in the Massif Central. The high mountains return on stage 14 in the Vosges; but the hardest stage of the race is reserved to the final week.
“Yes, I would have preferred the race between them to be much closer. The problem is not the route. The problem is the difference between Pogacar and the others," Gouvenou believes.
Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- as excellent as maga rednecks chloe dygert (and quinn simmons)?Ketterechts09-11-2026
- so what i understand is: i left a comment calling out the endless author CVs for being an unnecessary flex of expertise, and you responded by lecturing me (and others) on discrimination and value systems. hats off to you. you definitely lost me!Ketterechts09-11-2026
- I just love the flood of Americans into the top ranks of world cycling. In addition to being studs on the bike, they all seem to be excellent emissaries for our country.Occam09-11-2026
- ANATOMY OF A G.O.A.T. EDDY MERCKX about TADEJ POGAČAR: Merckx: “He has revived a style of cycling that we had almost forgotten. He is now better than me.” Key statements by Merckx about Pogačar in 2026: - Acknowledging his superiority: This time, Merckx openly admitted, without any subsequent backtracking or reservations, that Pogačar had surpassed him and was now above him. This contrasts with 2024, when he quickly softened his remarks about Pogačar being faster. - The possibility of a historic triple (Giro, Tour and Vuelta): During the July Tour de France (where Pogi claimed his fifth title), Merckx stated that Pogi was the only cyclist in history capable of winning all three Grand Tours (the Giro d'Italia, Tour de France and Vuelta a España) in a single season, provided the conditions were right and he had sufficient team support. - Lack of serious competition: Merckx emphasised that Pogačar has no real rivals in the mountains since 2024, thanks to his extraordinary climbing ability and the fact that he continues to improve despite still being under 28 (he turned 28 in autumn 2026). - Praise for his racing style: Merckx highlighted how Pogačar is bringing back the aggressive, uncompromising spirit of cycling's golden era, when races were not merely about calculated stages and tactical conservatism, but about attacking from long distances. PS: This is not "boring" ... this is called making real history, not only statistical history. Capish?PogiSloFans09-11-2026
- It’s off-season mate, I’m bored and fed up with the mediocrity of people unwilling to provoke change when they admit things aren’t right. What have you done lately to make anyone realise you won’t put up with things? What conversation, are you dictating to me which part of the incident I have to be interested in or telling me other parts are taboo? That’s what I guess the UCI would really like, let them moan, let it blow over for them pass on to the next thing, let’s keep the status quo, let’s try our best not reviewing or revealing anything about decision-making just like every time before, they’re used to it by now so we can take the risk they’ll never give us grief.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- As far as CUTD headlines go this is far from the worst. It helps if you look at it twice and realise it’s a list of descriptions from distinct events. You can’t deny the reality of being a rival if you consider the picture immediately below, frontrunner is unfortunate but I’m guessing this time it’s more a linguistic failure than a clickbaiting opportunity. Just a reminder that this is not an anglo website, for those who find it too tedious to interpret text to get the gist of things which are rarely of great importance (as opposed to eg purposely biaised DOJ extradition translations in order to achieve hidden agendas), there are plenty of anglo cycling websites google can suggest.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Ah, finally someone willing to be a bit proactive.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- So? Do you understand the way instructions, decisions and authority work? Do you think in a football match if after a match (or even after play has gone on) a player tells the referee he did touch the ball with his hands when the referee didn’t award opponents a penalty that they will revise the score or force a replay? You really don’t get my point, it’s not against the rider but everyone here is so emotional for her they can’t get back to an issue which needs resolving for the future and the first step (or maybe second) is to try to understand how and why it happens, none of you have contributed in the least to that. All everyone is interested in is letting everyone know they agree how unjust it was, not even sure anyone thinks that could affect anything.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Shouldn’t you be in MOUrning?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Maybe you don’t like it and that’s fine, we all have different sensibilities and topics that touch us, but as you try to show me, it doesn’t hurt to reflect and compare ourselves to others behaving similarly. What precisely is the difference between a sports fan interested in every detail of his/her hero’s life and a celeb fan having the same hobby? It’s far more interesting to learn and think about how and why (which) people do things than reading about what they are actually doing. And just to add another level, maybe you’ll agree we don’t use the same value system for everyone, we discriminate in an enormous number of systematic ways. For example, when is the last time you saw a discussion arguing about the achievements of two politicians to compare or for that matter two business leaders apart from the comparison of hypothetical wealth accumulated? Perhaps you misunderstood the intention?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment