"The plan was all in for Joao" - UAE DS evades the sore Ayuso topic after Almeida's victory on Angliru
Cycling
The Vuelta a España 2025 has experienced this Friday a drastic change of script. João Almeida has defeated Jonas Vingegaard in the queen stage with the final ascent up the mythical Alto de l'Angliru. The Portuguese achieved this victory thanks to a tremendous work of his UAE Team Emirates - XRG teammates. But again, except Juan Ayuso.
"It's crazy, we had a plan in the bus, we really strongly believed Joao could beat Jonas," Felix Großchartner told Eurosport. "It's crazy that he did it, but he did a fantastic job.
"Our plan was to take control of the race two kilometres from the top on the second last climb [the Cordal] because the descent is complicated, then control the entrance to the Angliru as well.
"Jay [Vine] did an amazing pull, and it was nice see that there weren't so many guys left. It's the second time I've done the Angliru, and today I think it became a bit steeper!"
Earlier in the day, Joxean Matxín made it clear that even Juan Ayuso was going to work for João Almeida from today's stage. No more chasing stages from the breakaway. So it was surprising to see the Spaniard drop on the previous climb, disengaging from the fight between his leader and Jonas Vingegaard.
However, in statements after the stage, Matxín did not mention Juan Ayuso:
"The plan was all in for Joao, do a hard rhythm, wait with Ivo in front at the start of the Angliru to do the work at the beginning. Also Jay (Vine), Felix (Grossschartner). Domen Novak did a spectacular job. Everyone has done amazing, and Joao is always there. To win ahead of Vingegaard on such a mythical climb is just awesome," he began.
"It was spectacular, pinch me to wake me up. We knew it was important to go out in the corner ahead in the last 400 meters, it has gone up with a brutal pace. We took the responsibility in the Cordal because we knew we had to take it. It was the first battle for the overall, we lost 46 seconds, there's still the Vuelta to go," he added.
Almeida beats Vingegaard on top of Angliru
"On the Angliru we didn't talk to him anymore, obviously. He was pedaling quite a bit. We simply told him that his parents were at the finish, and that he had to fight for the stage. Whether Vingegaard stayed or not was no longer up to him. He had to do his best, and the truth is that he deserved it from the beginning to the end. He dominated the Angliru and was the fair winner," Matxín continued, explaining the development of the final climb.
A new warning to Juan Ayuso?
"It's important because we are racing for Joao. Until now we considered them to be breakaway stages, and from today we're never going to try. The work and tactics have gone perfectly, Almeida's legs have been impressive, and let him know that we are all with him," Matxín said, perhaps as a message to Juan Ayuso who will no longer be able to fight for stages if he is to follow UAE's orders.
Ondrej ZhasilCycling Journalist
Ondřej Zhasil is a cycling journalist at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2023. He is based in Ostrava, the third-largest city in the Czech Republic, and covers professional cycling across the main UCI competitions, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España. A key focus of his work is startlist analysis and pre-race coverage, where he examines team selections, rider line-ups, and tactical scenarios ahead of major events.
Alongside WorldTour coverage, Ondřej has developed specific expertise in junior cycling and in racing across East Asia, including competitions in China and Japan. He also maintains a broad working knowledge of other disciplines and levels, including cyclocross, while continuing to expand his understanding of mountain bike racing.
Ondřej holds a bachelor’s degree in Mathematics and Physics, which supports his analytical, data-driven approach to performance and race analysis. In his reporting, he regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And yet, it attracts people, even you. What’s more, it attracts the rival fanboys to fill cyberspace with endless pointless my hero is better than your hero blabla that’s all been heard before and only helps sell the site as an advertising platform. You know what the solution is but most can’t resist. No different than women who follow and discuss celebs through gossip magazines.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- he is doing 460 watts for 35 min to achieve 7 w/kg with VO2 at 96 , just unreal numbers.abstractengineer08-11-2026
- Just do it, and put up with the consequencesJumpyjohn08-11-2026
- "was a headliner at the Tour de France" Nobody cared about Piddie. Only rivals that were there for Pogi, Jonas, Remco, Sexias, Lipo, Del Toro and they were all expected to lose. Piddie was not even in any conversation.abstractengineer08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment