“The King of the Selfie didn’t like that I visited” – Bruyneel hits back after UCI questions Tour de France appearance
Cycling
Johan Bruyneel’s unexpected appearance at the 2025 Tour de
France has triggered a swift response from cycling’s governing body, reigniting
old tensions around one of the sport’s most controversial figures. The UCI has
formally contacted race organiser ASO to explain how the Belgian, banned for
life from all UCI-sanctioned events, was granted access to restricted areas
during the race.
The former US Postal Service directeur sportif, banned for
his central role in the Lance Armstrong doping scandal, was spotted last week
as a guest on the Vive le Vélo television program and seen in locations
requiring official accreditation. While the UCI does not control the Tour’s
day-to-day access management, it reminded ASO that individuals under active
sanction are forbidden from participating in any capacity at races under its
umbrella, even unofficially.
Bruyneel, true to form, did not stay quiet.
“It seems that the president of the UCI, David ‘The King of
the Selfie’ Lappartient, did not like that I visited the Tour de France last
week,” Bruyneel wrote on social media. “I have already told him many times,
also in person, that I consider his attitude hypocritical.”
Read also
He added that after receiving the UCI’s press statement, he
reached out to Lappartient again directly, but had not yet received a response.
Bruyneel’s presence was not discreet. He mingled with teams,
media, and guests in areas inaccessible to the general public, triggering
immediate questions about whether he had been formally credentialed by ASO or
was allowed access through unofficial channels. Either way, the UCI is pressing
for answers.
Read also
In a separate message, Bruyneel thanked those who made the
visit possible, calling it a personal highlight. “I want to reiterate how nice
it was to have been present at the Tour and how much I appreciate the gestures
of welcome from so many people I met on that occasion,” he said.
The controversy puts ASO in an awkward position, forced to
clarify whether Bruyneel’s visit was officially sanctioned or slipped through
the cracks.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- LOL...it's a predetermined finish ! N one is 'clashing' at these exhibition crits!frieders307-11-2026
- Surely the UCI and the race organisers have a responsibility to ensure the best medical care is available to riders when incidents like this happen. All very well pushing for global expansion but not so good if riders lives are put at risk because medical support is not up to scratch.Andy12306-11-2026
- Well it clearly helps that this was Pidcock's own car, no?Occam06-11-2026
- The American performance at the World's road race was a masterclass in cycling tactics. If it wasn't McNulty, it might well have been Jorgensen or Simmons to take off and win in a solo break.Occam06-11-2026
- What a gimmick
Rafionain-Glas06-11-2026 - Thats only cause he rides for UAE. In any other team he would be captain in many races atleast. UAE is just to crazymiguel06-11-2026
- He seems to be the rare athlete whose passion and curiosity about life beyond his sport equals his extraordinary achievements in it. It would be great for him to risk less of that life. He seems very grateful and joyful for what he has already attained.
MarkFour06-11-2026 - As much as I admire and even revere Wout, the less I know about his backside the better.MidnightRider06-11-2026
- Ok, Walt 🤣... Vingegaard would be lucky to get on the poduim. He would not beat Seixas or Del Toro, let alone TP. Then there are the Americans...BD06-11-2026
- So, for starters. Cycling is a saturated, static/dying sport in traditional lands, it will not have resurgences like eg running occasionally does because of several obstacular (yes, I know that’s not a word but don’t make me point out the obvious at your expense) factors. Obviously, like almost everything involving money, there is a desire/need/advantage to growth and that can only come from (developing or just testing) new markets. For me, the WC is the obvious and best choice for several reasons, it comes at the end of the season so is less critical season risk wise, it is not a “pro” team race but nation based which makes integration of uncommon participation more natural. It is a vehicle for redistribution (one of a very limited number of available mechanisms to develop new markers fairly) that the fixed calendar doesn’t allow and it helps make budgets fairer over the long run (moving the whole circus to everywhere evens out everyone’s budget as opposed to having everyone always come to the same location.Jumpyjohn06-11-2026
Loading
3 Comments








