
Recently, I embarked on a personal challenge called the "Season Fantasy Challenge," where I'm competing in two year-long fantasy cycling competitions on Zweeler and FirstCycling. My ultimate ambition is to achieve the best possible finish. As we progress deeper into spring, the rankings have become more consolidated, offering interesting insights into the predictions.
This year I've taken on a little interesting challenge to test myself in two fantasy games throughout the season. With Zweeler and FirstCycling I experimented to see how I'd do against other cycling fans in a test of knowledge, and this is how it ended.
If you want to learn about both competitions I've entered, you can do so by reading the opening column.
Zweeler - https://en.zweeler.com/results/14951
FirstCycling - https://firstcycling.com/fantasy.php?k=sta
Read also
Zweeler
Goal: Top50
Final Ranking: 780th
Final Ranking: 780th
Quite a fun game, but one where I made evident mistakes. First and foremost, I did not appropriately see the races which the competition included. Hence, I selected several riders in my '25' that focused on minor races. Some of them did well, such as Arnaud De Lie, Axel Zingle, Gerben Thijssen and Tobias Johannessen, but many of their results were not taken into account. I've picked out a few riders that now I look back and were bad choices such as Sam Bennett, Fabio Jakobsen, Hugo Hofstetter and Patrick Bevin. Very badly used points.
Picking out Tadej Pogacar, Mads Pedersen, Filippo Ganna, Valentin Madouas, Alex Aranburu and Axel Zingle were good value per points. However I didn't have any of the main value riders such as Mark Cavendish, Ben Healy or Derek Gee as examples. I still believe I had a good choice of leaders with Tadej Pogacar and Wout van Aert, but perhaps I had too much of a mid-range field where several didn't score the points I hoped. David Gaudu and Michael Matthews as examples, but both Enric Mas and Juan Ayuso also had injuries affect them quite a bit and shrink the amount of points.
Still a game in good fun. I finished 780th, so I did climb back up the ranks quite a few hundred spots towards the final months but still far from what looked to be an achievable Top50 at the first part of the year. I payed €10, in the end the best 401 players got that amount back. I think I've learnt a bit and taking into consideration that I only have to pick my riders once and then follow the league throughout the whole season, then I'm quite looking forward to be part of it once again.
Read also
FirstCycling
Goal: 1st place
Final Ranking: 55th
Final Ranking: 55th
Ultimately a 55th spot. The season started off decently well and I was in the mix, but as the season moved I became aware of how much 'endurance' you need to have to stay high in the ranks. Safe to say I wasn't ready. Having missed a few competitions it deal small blows to my rankings - which are earned by consistency - and funnily, I missed a few races because I accidentally logged in a different account! Not that it would've made much difference in the end, likely I would've just been able to crack a Top50 at best, but far from my initial goal.
Interestingly, I finished 55th as well in the women's category. The amount of junior and under-23 events was a bit of a surprise for me, and in some a weak spot was shown when it came to my knowledge. Early in the year my ranking in the stage-races was among the best, but that faded in the second part of the season. Congratulations still to Beeno Gang for winning the men's competition, and Erythropoietin for winning the women's.
Will I come back? Likely not. It is a fun game, and actually one that really puts your cycling knowledge to the line quite well, and where consistency is much more important than lucky shots, which I love. But unless you're fully in the zone it becomes hard to select lineups to all races in time, and I personally take a bit of a hit when it comes to motivation when I accidentally skipped a few. Fully recommend it however.
Read also

Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment







