The questions are always inevitable by the time the Tour de France comes, but with Pogacar strongly making an argument for a third consecutive overall win already on stage 6, these have come earlier than expected in the race. These questions are likely to fall on Pogacar and UAE directly over the coming weeks.
“But I absolutely do not want to go down the road of insinuations here. First and foremost, I am watching a cyclist I enjoy enormously. As I was trying to explain earlier with those images of the descents, he is simply a fantastically good rider. I hope everything is completely fair, and for now, that is also what we should assume.”
Pogacar dominated stage 6 of the Tour de France
No evidence against Pogacar
The rainbow jersey dominates in multiple aspects of the sport, putting forward the image that he is a rider who is genetically above the rest of the peloton, whilst following training and nutrition programs that help him reach his best physical level - whilst being part of the sport's best team at the moment.
The helplessness of his rivals at the Tour makes it a dramatic image, with the best climbers in the world going head-to-head against him in their best form. Dumoulin does not go down the path of insinuations, but does not ignore the need for strong and consistent testing.
“There is no reason or evidence whatsoever to suggest otherwise. In the past, that evidence and those signs did exist, but right now there really is nothing. Of course, we should not all be naive either, but in a way it is also a compliment to him. That you are so good people immediately start thinking along those lines," the Dutchman argues. "Again: I understand the question, and I hope I have answered it as well as possible.”
“Sometimes in sport, we try to explain those rare super talents — the ones who come along once every so often — in our own human way. We try to explain why a Messi is so good, but in reality we simply do not understand it," Dumoulin compares.
But with the exposure to cycling higher than ever in July, the accusations spread like wildfire internationally. "That can sometimes create a bit of resistance, especially in the Netherlands. We do not understand it, but above all, we should enjoy it. Every now and then, someone comes along with that kind of enormous mega-talent.”
Dumoulin puts into question Jonas Vingegaard's equipment
Simultaneously, Dumoulin has put into question Jonas Vingegaard's equipment during the first key stage of the race. Most specifically, the use of a one-ring chainring.
“What stood out most on the Tourmalet, where we briefly got a good look at it, was his equipment choice. He was riding up the Tourmalet on his big ring. You think, wow, on the big ring? But the point is that he only has one chainring.”
Vingegaard's defeat over the Slovenian was a tough hit. But as it stands, the Dane looked by far the second best on the Col du Tourmalet, and was professional after a difficult result at the finish line in Gavarnie.
“It’s quite something to see. Straight after the finish, all the journalists were around him again. You can imagine that when you lose almost three minutes on day six of the Tour, in the first real mountain stage, the only thing you want to do is go straight to the team bus. But he didn’t do that. He really took the time," Dumoulin, a former teammate of the Dane, pointed out.
“Jonas has specifically chosen a single chainring at the front. That automatically means you only have eleven or twelve gears at the back to work with. So you have to manage that on the steepest climbs, but also in the fastest descents where you want to push a much bigger gear.”
Was Vingegaard's gear choice on the Tourmalet sub-optimal?
“And what is he doing all this for? To save a tiny bit of weight compared to a double chainring. We might be talking about 40 or 50 grams. That’s hardly anything. Spray your bottle one time less and you’ve already saved that.”
Dumoulin argues that there is no reason to change from a traditional chainring setup, as is used by the majority of the peloton. On the very fast descent off the Tourmalet and gentle climb to the finish, the lack of a larger chainring might have aided in the creation of such a large gap between the two. But even uphill, a difference may be felt.
It comes down to personal choice, but in Dumoulin's eyes, it's not a worthy change. “You also risk pure energy loss. Because the chain, without a second chainring, is more often at an angle, there is extra friction in the drivetrain. That is simply power loss. Not all the energy you put through the pedals reaches the rear wheel as effectively.”