There are performances that win races, and others that reshape how we see an athlete. What Tadej Pogacar did on the Tourmalet belongs clearly to the second group. It was not just a stage win at the Tour de France. It was such an overwhelming show of superiority that it forces a question that goes beyond cycling: are we watching the best athlete on the planet? And, if we stretch the debate further, can he already enter the conversation about the greatest athlete of all time?
The Tour de France, barring a major surprise, looks virtually decided. Jonas Vingegaard, the only rider in recent years able to challenge the Slovenian’s hegemony, no longer seems at his level. He held on reasonably well on the Tourmalet, but then again exposed his shortcomings versus Pogacar elsewhere: he lost more time on the descent and across the flatter, faster section of the stage. That is precisely the big shift we are witnessing.
We are no longer talking only about the best climber in the world. Nor merely the best Classics rider. We are talking about a cyclist who commands almost every facet of the sport. He climbs better than anyone, descends better than his direct rivals, cruises the flats with extraordinary power and, on top of that, keeps an explosiveness and endurance ability that very few can match. Not even riders with exceptional changes of pace can hold his wheel when he decides to accelerate.
That turns any race into an exercise in survival for the rest.
It is true that Mathieu van der Poel can still challenge him at certain Monuments, especially those that are less physically selective, and that Paris-Roubaix remains a race where the Dutchman starts with an edge. But even there Pogacar has already shown he can go toe to toe. In almost any other setting, the outright favourite bears his name.
Read also
That is why the debate ceases to belong exclusively to cycling.
Across today’s sporting landscape it is hard to find a comparable level of dominance. In Football we are no longer watching Messi at his peak. In Basketball LeBron James remains a legend, but no longer in full athletic prime. In Tennis, Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner share a superb rivalry precisely because neither clearly imposes himself over the other. In Formula 1, even the most dominant champions have always depended in part on the car they drive.
Pogacar, however, gives the sense of being superior in and of himself.
That is extraordinarily hard to achieve in modern sport, where physical, technological and scientific parity among the best teams grows tighter each year.
The next question is even tougher: could he be the greatest athlete in history?
Tadej Pogacar has been ruling over the ongoing Tour de France
A blunt answer would be a mistake. Comparing eras is always unfair. Contexts change, preparation evolves, and sports transform. It makes little sense to measure Eddy Merckx, Michael Jordan, Lionel Messi, Michael Phelps or Novak Djokovic with the same yardstick.
But it does make sense to include Pogacar in that conversation.
Because even within cycling he is doing things that are hard to find in any era. Merckx amassed a palmarès that is probably unreachable, but even he found rivals who could challenge him in the mountains or beat him in the Tour de France. Pogacar, by contrast, is reaching a level of all-round superiority that is hard to recall.
There is also another aspect that often goes unnoticed.
Great athletes usually need years to build their definitive reign. Michael Jordan suffered before conquering the NBA. Other champions also needed a long learning curve before dominating their disciplines.
Pogacar’s greatness
Pogacar won the Tour de France at a very young age. He then lost two editions to Jonas Vingegaard. Far from crumbling, he returned an even more complete rider, to the point of turning his greatest rival into a clearly inferior cyclist; whilst almost everyone in the sport has gone out of reach to even challenge him.
That process of evolution speaks volumes about his greatness.
We are not talking about a champion who exploited a weak generation. We are talking about an athlete who was beaten by an exceptional rival and responded by raising his level even further, transforming the rivalry into a new hegemony.
Perhaps in ten years we will be able to answer that big question with more perspective. Perhaps by then we will know whether he truly was the greatest athlete of all time.
What does seem indisputable today is something much simpler: we are witnessing one of the greatest displays of dominance modern sport has offered. And that, regardless of where he ultimately sits in history, makes Tadej Pogacar a privilege for any sports fan.
Juan LarraCycling Journalist
Juan Larra is a writer for Cyclinguptodate and editor-in-chief of Ciclismoaldia, where he has played a central role since its inception. Under his leadership, the website has become a trusted source for professional cycling coverage, offering in-depth analysis, news, and feature stories.
A sports journalist with over 20 years of experience, Juan earned his degree in Journalism from the University of Seville in 2007. He began his career covering a wide range of sports—including football, basketball, Formula 1, MotoGP, tennis, and cycling—for platforms such as the official La Liga app, Vodafone and Movistar websites, NBA Blogdebasket, and Cadena Cope, honing his skills in writing and editorial management.
In addition to his work at Ciclismoaldia, Juan contributes to Cyclinguptodate and serves as editor-in-chief for the tennis-focused site Tenisaldia. Throughout his career, he has conducted exclusive interviews with cyclists and sports figures, provided detailed analysis of competitions ranging from local Spanish races to major international events, and acted as a special correspondent at prestigious races including Paris-Roubaix, the Tour de France, and the Vuelta a España.
Juan’s combination of experience, expertise, and direct access to athletes has established him—and the platforms he leads—as authoritative voices in professional cycling.
claps 7visitors 5
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- as excellent as maga rednecks chloe dygert (and quinn simmons)?Ketterechts09-11-2026
- so what i understand is: i left a comment calling out the endless author CVs for being an unnecessary flex of expertise, and you responded by lecturing me (and others) on discrimination and value systems. hats off to you. you definitely lost me!Ketterechts09-11-2026
- I just love the flood of Americans into the top ranks of world cycling. In addition to being studs on the bike, they all seem to be excellent emissaries for our country.Occam09-11-2026
- ANATOMY OF A G.O.A.T. EDDY MERCKX about TADEJ POGAČAR: Merckx: “He has revived a style of cycling that we had almost forgotten. He is now better than me.” Key statements by Merckx about Pogačar in 2026: - Acknowledging his superiority: This time, Merckx openly admitted, without any subsequent backtracking or reservations, that Pogačar had surpassed him and was now above him. This contrasts with 2024, when he quickly softened his remarks about Pogačar being faster. - The possibility of a historic triple (Giro, Tour and Vuelta): During the July Tour de France (where Pogi claimed his fifth title), Merckx stated that Pogi was the only cyclist in history capable of winning all three Grand Tours (the Giro d'Italia, Tour de France and Vuelta a España) in a single season, provided the conditions were right and he had sufficient team support. - Lack of serious competition: Merckx emphasised that Pogačar has no real rivals in the mountains since 2024, thanks to his extraordinary climbing ability and the fact that he continues to improve despite still being under 28 (he turned 28 in autumn 2026). - Praise for his racing style: Merckx highlighted how Pogačar is bringing back the aggressive, uncompromising spirit of cycling's golden era, when races were not merely about calculated stages and tactical conservatism, but about attacking from long distances. PS: This is not "boring" ... this is called making real history, not only statistical history. Capish?PogiSloFans09-11-2026
- It’s off-season mate, I’m bored and fed up with the mediocrity of people unwilling to provoke change when they admit things aren’t right. What have you done lately to make anyone realise you won’t put up with things? What conversation, are you dictating to me which part of the incident I have to be interested in or telling me other parts are taboo? That’s what I guess the UCI would really like, let them moan, let it blow over for them pass on to the next thing, let’s keep the status quo, let’s try our best not reviewing or revealing anything about decision-making just like every time before, they’re used to it by now so we can take the risk they’ll never give us grief.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- As far as CUTD headlines go this is far from the worst. It helps if you look at it twice and realise it’s a list of descriptions from distinct events. You can’t deny the reality of being a rival if you consider the picture immediately below, frontrunner is unfortunate but I’m guessing this time it’s more a linguistic failure than a clickbaiting opportunity. Just a reminder that this is not an anglo website, for those who find it too tedious to interpret text to get the gist of things which are rarely of great importance (as opposed to eg purposely biaised DOJ extradition translations in order to achieve hidden agendas), there are plenty of anglo cycling websites google can suggest.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Ah, finally someone willing to be a bit proactive.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- So? Do you understand the way instructions, decisions and authority work? Do you think in a football match if after a match (or even after play has gone on) a player tells the referee he did touch the ball with his hands when the referee didn’t award opponents a penalty that they will revise the score or force a replay? You really don’t get my point, it’s not against the rider but everyone here is so emotional for her they can’t get back to an issue which needs resolving for the future and the first step (or maybe second) is to try to understand how and why it happens, none of you have contributed in the least to that. All everyone is interested in is letting everyone know they agree how unjust it was, not even sure anyone thinks that could affect anything.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Shouldn’t you be in MOUrning?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Maybe you don’t like it and that’s fine, we all have different sensibilities and topics that touch us, but as you try to show me, it doesn’t hurt to reflect and compare ourselves to others behaving similarly. What precisely is the difference between a sports fan interested in every detail of his/her hero’s life and a celeb fan having the same hobby? It’s far more interesting to learn and think about how and why (which) people do things than reading about what they are actually doing. And just to add another level, maybe you’ll agree we don’t use the same value system for everyone, we discriminate in an enormous number of systematic ways. For example, when is the last time you saw a discussion arguing about the achievements of two politicians to compare or for that matter two business leaders apart from the comparison of hypothetical wealth accumulated? Perhaps you misunderstood the intention?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
Loading
3 Comments