Pidcock, Alaphilippe and Hirschi are in! Giro d'Italia reveals the 5 teams that have received wildcard for 2025 edition
Cycling
The Giro d'Italia has announced the 23 teams that will participate this year. After the UCI confirmed the expanding of wildcard to another team at Grand Tours, the need for a decision between two of the main teams was no longer necessary. Tom Pidcock, Julian Alaphilippe and Marc Hirschi may all race the Corsa Rosa!
Thus, Tudor Pro Cycling Team, after the invitation to the Tour de France, also ensures its presence in the Giro. An incredible year for Fabian Cancellara's team, which after the signings of Marc Hirschi and Julian Alaphilippe has given an incredible turn to its structure.
Q36.5 Pro Cycling Team, which is ahead of Uno-X in the Corsa Rosa, also finds room on this occasion, and takes a place that we will see if it includes Tom Pidcock in the package. These two teams were directly in a battle for the final wildcard, as the two Italian teams had seemed certain of it.
The VF Group - Bardiani CSF - Faizanè and Team Polti VisitMalta of Alberto Contador and Ivan Basso, who will race their fifth consecutive corsa rosa between May 9 and June 1, close the field. They have not only talented lineups and the nationality in their favour, but show themselves very combative all year long.
Ivan Basso, part of the Polti team who will have in Davide Piganzoli a very interesting stage hunter or even GC contender, was delighted with the invitation: "The fifth invitation to the Giro d'Italia fills us with pride and increases our responsibility and desire to surprise".
"Our constant growth has allowed us to gain credibility with the organizers and the general public, building a community that began with the fans of our two founders and has come to involve the Team Polti fans of the nineties and the cycling enthusiasts of today".
Read also
23 teams, one epic race: wildcards are locked in!💥 Who are you rooting for?📢
— Giro d'Italia (@giroditalia) March 31, 2025
23 squadre, una corsa epica: le Wildcard sono state assegnate!💥 Per chi fai il tifo?📢#GirodItalia pic.twitter.com/5qTRkk4KTP
Nice though you have to ask why they call it a wildcard as it’s always pretty obvious who will receive them.
Just in
Play for FREE! Fantasy Tour of Flanders
Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter today!
Popular news
Latest comments
- Great commentCaralladas05-04-2025
- i’m such a sucker for those group-hug, happy ending moments between competitors, largely because it’s so WASN’T that way in my younger, stronger days. (on that note, i have this hope that somewhere down the road, maybe fifteen or twenty years, a middle aged wout and mathieu will go for a pleasure ride together in flanders, and reminisce about the days when they were the young, strong monsters that stalked the cobbles.)OCexile05-04-2025
- Just like Dwars door Vlaanderen, the Ronde van Vlaanderen was/is NOT on MAX. Get your facts straight.Ben04-04-2025
- You might bounce more for the same power, but not the same speed. Sending 20 kgs over a jump at 20 kph will fly just as far as 10 kgs at the same speed. Again, Galileo demonstrated this.acem8204-04-2025
- So, you're saying that doing a bunch of small hops on a bike is easier if you're heavier? Why do people buy lighter bikes, then? Why do they generally feel better and faster? An appeal to "rhythm" is not helpful either, as the right "rhythm" might be on the lighter or heavier side of things, and as it varies, it's likely a wash either way. Then we are left with the physics truth that it takes less power to lift lighter things than heavier things.acem8204-04-2025
- No, weight doesn't affect the ability to go into the wind at all. It's all CdA vs power at that point. For example, it's "obvious" that a heavier object falls faster than a lighter one. But, absent wind resistance, it's not true (Galileo demonstrated this). An appeal to "obviousness" doesn't matter when the physics is clear. And yes, you have to be able to hold everything else constant, or you can't determine anything! So, imagine a 300 watt rider at 80 kgs with a CdA of 2.0, then imagine that same rider at 70 kgs with a CdA of 2.0. (Assume ideal tire pressure for both, same bike.) Which one can ride over a bumpy road fastest? The lighter one, as he doesn't have to lift as much. That's also why when they test bikes on 5 star cobbled sectors, the MTB goes faster than even a cobble-build road bike. Even though rolling resistance is higher on a flat road, and the CdA is junk, it smooths out the cobbles, allowing the person to not lift as much as they otherwise would.acem8204-04-2025
- I disagree. If you have lower weight, you will bounce more at the same speed, meaning that you will spend more time in the air and shorter time on the ground, as a consequence, when you are on the ground you have to produce more force for the same speedvappaxbipmv04-04-2025
- That’s not quite true, even steep climbs and sudden gradient changes can be considered as remaining tangential to the wheel whereas the occasional dip between cobbles a wheel drops into cannot, as such riding over cobbles can become like a permanent surmounting of small obstacles that hit back into your wheel slowing you drastically if you don’t have the right rhythm to “fly” on the mounds, here again the greater the momentum the less these obstacles reduce your speed. But, it is but one factor, you cannot decide on this alone. Like with natural surface ripple formation on desert tracks used by vehicles, there is an optimal speed range to efficiently pass over such surfaces, too fast or slow and your car gets shaken to pieces from the “harmonics” in the vibrations caused. Pretty sure the same applies to riding on cobbles.Mistermaumau04-04-2025
- I am saying I have an open mind at the moment for your cobbles theory but cannot agree with your wind statement (and by extrapolation sprinting since that implies speeds where wind is by far the limiting factor). Had you argued all things not being equal I could have agreed with you but if we thus assume 2 objets of the same size and speed but with differing weights, it is completely obvious that the lighter one will suffer faster in the wind. Extrapolate to the extreme, drop stuff off cliffs or just remember your momentum equations to verify. Now, obviously in real life we have to assume riders of different weights won’t have the same wind hitting surface but you cannot generalise at all then as you can have very unaerodynamic light riders and very aerodynamic heavy ones because it isn’t weight that defines CdA, Teslas have an incredible CdA and are ridiculously heavy, and someone like Harry Levreyssen is a Tesla in cycling.Mistermaumau04-04-2025
- When Roglic beat Geraint Thomas on the last day's TT at the Giro, I remember just how unbelievably emotional his team was. One guy, I forget who, German rider I think, was interviewed and was nearly speechless with a really drawn out "fuuuuuuuuuck it's incredible" comment. And then something even more amazing happened. Geraint Thomas came through the ranks of the Jumbo Visma riders and congratulated them all. True, honest, sincere, sportsmanlike, and celebratory of what had been achieved. Here he was, getting second, and he meant it. And cycling these days is like that, as you say - the way Pogacar hugged Matthews in Quebec, the way Matthews congratulated Pogacar in Montreal, on and on they honor and respect each other. It's pretty great.RidesHills04-04-2025