
The fabled climb of La Planche des Belles Filles could soon
reappear on the Tour de France map, with French outlet L’Est Républicain
reporting that it is being lined up for the 2026 edition. For now, little is
known about the route, but early whispers suggest this climb and Alpe d’Huez
may both feature in the race. The official presentation is set for Thursday,
October 23, when full details will be revealed. Until then, history provides
the perfect reminder of why this short but brutal ascent has become one of the
defining stages of modern Tours. In fact, perhaps the most dramatic moment in
the history of the Tour occurred on this climb.
Measuring just 5.9 kilometers but averaging a punishing 8.5
percent gradient, La Planche des Belles Filles first appeared in 2012. That day
Chris Froome crossed the line first, launching into public view as a rider
seemingly stronger than team leader Bradley Wiggins. Wiggins would go on to
secure overall victory, but Froome’s display on the climb marked the beginning
of his transformation from super-domestique into future Tour champion. It was a
moment that shifted the dynamic within Team Sky and set the tone for years of
dominance that followed for the Kenyan born British rder.
The climb returned in 2014, when Vincenzo Nibali won the
stage on his way to capturing the yellow jersey in Paris. That year, La Planche
des Belles Filles was again decisive, cementing Nibali’s control of the general
classification at a relatively early point in the race.
But we all know the year that La Planche des Belles Filles
etched itself into the history books.
Read also
Six years later, it became the setting for one of the most
dramatic finales in Tour history. The 2020 penultimate-stage time trial
finished at the summit, with Tadej Pogacar overturning a seemingly unassailable
deficit to Primoz Roglic. Pogacar’s astonishing ride not only secured him the
yellow jersey, but also entered cycling folklore as one of the sport’s (in fact,
any sport’s) greatest upsets.
Two years on, in 2022, the climb again delivered a show.
Pogacar and Jonas Vingegaard fought wheel-to-wheel, with the Slovenian narrowly
defeating the Dane at the line when it looked like his rival had pulled ahead.
That edition introduced the “Super Planche des Belles Filles,” extending the
climb with a gravel section that made the finale even more demanding. The
addition highlighted both the physical and tactical challenges of the ascent,
pushing riders beyond the limits of traditional mountain finishes, with riders
often collapsing over the finish line.
Read also
The significance of La Planche des Belles Filles stretches
beyond road racing, or at least it does if rumours are to be believed. Earlier
this summer, the venue was named as a candidate for the 2030 Winter Olympics,
where organisers plan to introduce cyclocross. As event co-ordinator
Jean-Pierre Lefèvre explained, “We are located just a four-hour drive from
Belgium and the Netherlands, where cyclocross culture is robust. We know how to
make it work; it will be a grand celebration.”
If the rumours prove true, the 2026 Tour de France will
again revisit a mountain that has shaped modern cycling narratives. Much like
the Col de la Loze, La Planche des Belles Filles has quickly established itself
as a modern Tour de France classic, where heroes can be either made or
destroyed. From Froome’s rise in 2012, Nibali’s win 2014, Pogacar’s miracle in
2020, to his duel with Vingegaard in 2022, the summit has repeatedly hosted
decisive chapters in the sport over the past 15 years. Until October’s
announcement, speculation will continue, but we hope that the rumours are true
and we will return to La Planche des Belles Filles next July.
Read also
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- ANATOMY OF A G.O.A.T. EDDY MERCKX about TADEJ POGAČAR: Merckx: “He has revived a style of cycling that we had almost forgotten. He is now better than me.” Key statements by Merckx about Pogačar in 2026: - Acknowledging his superiority: This time, Merckx openly admitted, without any subsequent backtracking or reservations, that Pogačar had surpassed him and was now above him. This contrasts with 2024, when he quickly softened his remarks about Pogačar being faster. - The possibility of a historic triple (Giro, Tour and Vuelta): During the July Tour de France (where Pogi claimed his fifth title), Merckx stated that Pogi was the only cyclist in history capable of winning all three Grand Tours (the Giro d'Italia, Tour de France and Vuelta a España) in a single season, provided the conditions were right and he had sufficient team support. - Lack of serious competition: Merckx emphasised that Pogačar has no real rivals in the mountains since 2024, thanks to his extraordinary climbing ability and the fact that he continues to improve despite still being under 28 (he turned 28 in autumn 2026). - Praise for his racing style: Merckx highlighted how Pogačar is bringing back the aggressive, uncompromising spirit of cycling's golden era, when races were not merely about calculated stages and tactical conservatism, but about attacking from long distances. PS: This is not "boring" ... this is called making real history, not only statistical history. Capish?PogiSloFans09-11-2026
- It’s off-season mate, I’m bored and fed up with the mediocrity of people unwilling to provoke change when they admit things aren’t right. What have you done lately to make anyone realise you won’t put up with things? What conversation, are you dictating to me which part of the incident I have to be interested in or telling me other parts are taboo? That’s what I guess the UCI would really like, let them moan, let it blow over for them pass on to the next thing, let’s keep the status quo, let’s try our best not reviewing or revealing anything about decision-making just like every time before, they’re used to it by now so we can take the risk they’ll never give us grief.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- As far as CUTD headlines go this is far from the worst. It helps if you look at it twice and realise it’s a list of descriptions from distinct events. You can’t deny the reality of being a rival if you consider the picture immediately below, frontrunner is unfortunate but I’m guessing this time it’s more a linguistic failure than a clickbaiting opportunity. Just a reminder that this is not an anglo website, for those who find it too tedious to interpret text to get the gist of things which are rarely of great importance (as opposed to eg purposely biaised DOJ extradition translations in order to achieve hidden agendas), there are plenty of anglo cycling websites google can suggest.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Ah, finally someone willing to be a bit proactive.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- So? Do you understand the way instructions, decisions and authority work? Do you think in a football match if after a match (or even after play has gone on) a player tells the referee he did touch the ball with his hands when the referee didn’t award opponents a penalty that they will revise the score or force a replay? You really don’t get my point, it’s not against the rider but everyone here is so emotional for her they can’t get back to an issue which needs resolving for the future and the first step (or maybe second) is to try to understand how and why it happens, none of you have contributed in the least to that. All everyone is interested in is letting everyone know they agree how unjust it was, not even sure anyone thinks that could affect anything.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Shouldn’t you be in MOUrning?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Maybe you don’t like it and that’s fine, we all have different sensibilities and topics that touch us, but as you try to show me, it doesn’t hurt to reflect and compare ourselves to others behaving similarly. What precisely is the difference between a sports fan interested in every detail of his/her hero’s life and a celeb fan having the same hobby? It’s far more interesting to learn and think about how and why (which) people do things than reading about what they are actually doing. And just to add another level, maybe you’ll agree we don’t use the same value system for everyone, we discriminate in an enormous number of systematic ways. For example, when is the last time you saw a discussion arguing about the achievements of two politicians to compare or for that matter two business leaders apart from the comparison of hypothetical wealth accumulated? Perhaps you misunderstood the intention?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- I don’t think I know what’s beneath the surface but I am willing to think about it, discuss it, compare it to a known past, extrapolate to a potential future and ask/try to find out truth or even take action within my powers (boycotting something or someone is within EVERY person’s reach). If you think your attitude has more chance of changing a result, a process, a system or an institution or it just makes you feel good, keep at it but to me it looks like you’ve already given up before trying.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- All journalists should start asking the UCI uncomfortable questions, sending inquiries about the interpretation of the rules and the justification of the results. This is the only way to change anything.averagecyclist09-11-2026
- how else is there to look at things? we are responding to words and pictures, we are not there. your long winded replies make zero sense to anyone. pretty much everyone but you says the same thing. MS was robbed. somehow you think you're so smart to dig beneath the surface and discover something no one else, including the opposing coach and cyclist, saw. lol. you are a tool.mij09-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment











