
Johan Bruyneel, on Lance Armstrong's The Move show, gave his thoughts on stage 11 of the Tour de France and was harsh on Tadej Pogacar and UAE Team Emirates for trying a tactic he believes was stupid against an obviously in-form Jonas Vingegaard.
The former cyclist and current analyst began by explaining what happened on a very hard but not high-mountain day: "It was a very long stage by today's Tour standards and more than 4000 meters of elevation gain, like the big mountain stages, but it wasn't a mountain stage, because there were hills, there were no mountains. It was a very hard stage from the start, it took the breakaway 80 km to get going and the average was 50 km/h, crazy. It was a high quality breakaway with Ben Healy, Richard Carapaz, Oier Lazkano, very strong... so you think it(the victory, ed.) goes to the breakaway of the day, it's logical. The yellow jersey team controlling without anyone for the overall, but nothing like that happened. UAE in my opinion set too high a pace and took out the breakaway quickly."
Read also
Bruyneel can't explain how UAE, having the yellow jersey, decided to attack Vingegaard with 30 kilometers to go as if the rest of the rivals didn't exist, taking a huge risk in exchange for a reward that, at best, would not have been huge: "I honestly don't understand why they raced like that. You have the yellow and you should know that Jonas is in good shape, he passed the mountain stage, the time trial and the gravel day, he's in good shape. What I can't understand is that it was clear that the moment to attack for Pogacar was in that last kilometer of the hardest pass 30 km from the finish, that he could take as he did an advantage, but you always have to look at the effort-reward: how much in terms of energy it costs to gain time and if it's really worth the effort."
"If after the descent there had been the finish line it would have been worth it, but there were 30 km to go. And, ok, Pogacar, you're in good shape, maybe in the best shape in the world, but the others are too and they weren't going to look at you and let you go, and that's what happened. First, they burned the whole team before Pogacar attacked. Then, when he went off in this last kilometer, it became clear that Vingegaard could at his pace slowly cut him back. Then he made a great effort on the descent, pedaling and putting himself at risk by expending a lot of energy."
Read also
Pogacar's most dangerous rival is Pogacar
Thus, Johan Bruyneel is very clear that if Tade.j continues to race like this throughout the Tour de France 2024, he will end up paying dearly for it. "Tadej Pogacar's most dangerous rival is called Tadej Pogacar and we have seen that at the stage. UAE made a stupid tactic, I don't understand it, he has a 1:15 lead, Vingegaard is behind, he is the one who has to attack him."
"My conclusion is that although Pogacar has said that Visma is afraid of him it is he who is afraid of Visma, Pogacar is afraid of Jonas. They made a big mistake, I think it made sense to attack Vingegaard like that in the early stages, but not now that he is fit. They made a big mistake, first trying to go for the stage, putting the whole team in the lead, it's a bit disrespectful to the rest of the peloton, UAE races as if the rest of the rivals don't exist, but today it blew up in their face. Tadaj had was loaded with energy, but he ran out of anything in the tank," he concluded.
Read also

Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 5visitors 4
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Are you MrMauMau 2.0? Nothing you are saying is really relevant. Vaguely connected, but irrelevant. The conversation is whether Schreiber impeded Brand or not.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026
Loading
💛 ⚔️ It’s a brutal finale in today’s #TDF2024, @TamauPogi finished in second to hold onto the yellow jersey for another day. #UAETeamEmirates
1 Comments










