“It might be too big a change” – Murmurs inside the peloton suggest tradition could block Tadej Pogacar’s Giro–Vuelta switch
Cycling
In modern cycling, innovation rarely fails because it lacks logic. More often, it fails because the sport is not ready to let go of what it has always done. That tension sits at the heart of the debate sparked this winter by Tadej Pogacar, whose call to reshuffle the Grand Tour calendar has exposed how powerful tradition still is inside the peloton.
“I’ve been saying for years that it would be much better if the Giro and the Vuelta swapped dates,” Pogacar said, arguing that weather conditions and rider participation would benefit if Spain’s Grand Tour moved to the spring.
The idea itself is simple. The reaction to it has not been.
When logic meets cycling’s immovable calendar
From a sporting perspective, Pogacar’s reasoning is hard to dismiss. The Tour–Vuelta double remains one of the most demanding combinations in the sport, particularly for riders who also target the World Championships. A calendar shift would, in theory, reopen the Vuelta to riders currently forced to choose.
Inside UAE Team Emirates - XRG, the proposal has been met with open minds rather than defensiveness. Team manager Joxean Fernandez Matxin admitted the idea had not occurred to him previously, but said Pogacar’s explanation changed that. “When I read Tadej’s explanation, I thought there’s actually something in that,” he said in quotes collected by Sporza.
Matxin’s support is rooted less in ambition than in logistics. “For example, we can never reconnoitre the Giro climbs because there is so much snow there in April,” he explained, pointing to repeated experiences of stages being cancelled or neutralised due to cold or rain. From his base in Spain, the contrast is obvious. “In Spain, the weather in May is nicer than in Italy.”
Yet logic, in cycling, has never been the only currency.
A sport shaped by memory, not just margins
Across the peloton, the response has been notably cautious. Not because the idea is radical, but because it would disturb an order that has remained largely untouched for decades.
Ralph Denk, manager of Red Bull - BORA - hansgrohe, offered a reminder that the calendar has already evolved once before. “When I started racing 40 years ago, the Vuelta took place in April,” he said, recalling a time when Spain hosted the season’s first Grand Tour.
But Denk was equally quick to question whether exceptional weather moments justify wholesale change. “Two years ago there was that Livigno stage in the Giro when snowfall on the Umbrail Pass caused chaos,” he said. “But does that happen every year? I don’t think so. Last year, for example, the weather during the Giro was excellent.”
The implication is clear: isolated problems may not be enough to outweigh the comfort of familiarity.
Why tradition still wins
At Lidl-Trek, sports director Steven de Jongh captured the underlying hesitation more directly. “In itself, I would find it logical for the Giro and the Vuelta to swap places, especially if you look at the weather,” he said. “But the race is tied to tradition, so it might be too big a change.”
That sentence, more than any other, explains why Pogacar’s idea is unlikely to gain traction quickly. The Grand Tours are not just races. They are institutions, bound to broadcasters, organisers, sponsors and national identities.
De Jongh also pointed to a practical complication that logic alone cannot solve. The Giro and the Vuelta are run by different organisers, RCS and ASO, respectively. Even if sporting arguments align, coordination at that level would be far from straightforward.
A debate that outgrows its instigator
For Pogacar, the calendar discussion is not framed as a demand, but as an observation. Yet the response it has triggered shows how resistant cycling remains to structural change, even when proposed by its most dominant rider.
The irony is that Pogacar’s status may work against him here. His success allows him to question the system, but it also makes it easier for the system to say no.
For now, the Giro–Vuelta switch remains hypothetical. Not because it lacks merit, but because in a sport defined by history, changing dates may prove harder than winning races.
Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 14visitors 10
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Sounds like we all agree with the over under exaggeration: "The German’s signing does not guarantee that Evenepoel will win the Tour in 2027. "flyer14-11-2026
- Seixas appears to be that good but if he isn't (an absolute rival to Pogacar) he would have plenty of company in rising stars that did not go on to fully meet the expectations of many. That Pogacar wasn't the greatest (as great) sooner can't be transposed onto another's development. It may be not that simple.flyer14-11-2026
- I agree that, for Evenepoel, the Euro championship is overshadowed by the slightly off Lombardia and Worlds. However, I disagree that "Ciccone also made a serious mistake at the European Championships" because I don't think he had a win in the bag although he could have won with a perfect bike throw. Guesswork about the finish is not evidence by me for some serious mistake. Sometimes you just barely lose - although Ciccone's sourpuss about it persona was serious.flyer14-11-2026
- I bet you photobombed the video since you are his shadow!frieders314-11-2026
- Skipping the 2027 TDF would be fine in my opinion, and if so, it further reveals that him racing it in 2026 was a good decision. Seixas speaks confident, almost cocky, these days (not meant to be a criticism) and I find it a tad humorous that people (rather commentators) continually chide and advise on how Decathlon should direct and manage Seixas when Paul seems to be calling all his shots since well before this year's TDF.flyer14-11-2026
- Well I just watched this and I thought it was great! If you’re a Pogi fan, like me, you’ll enjoy it. Even if you’re not necessarily a Pogi fan I still recommend it. There’s plenty of new stuff I didn’t know about and I’m a Pogi-maniac! Nice interviews with Pogi & Matteo Trentin too.Lozza14-11-2026
- Well I just watched this and I thought it was great! If you’re a Pogi fan, like me, you’ll enjoy it. Even if you’re not necessarily a Pogi fan I still recommend it. There’s plenty of new stuff I didn’t know about and I’m a Pogi-maniac! Nice interviews with Pogi & Matteo Trentin too. So Zonnewotsit can stick it!Lozza14-11-2026
- Who’s gifting grand tours at UAE? Defo not Pogi! Stage wins maybe.Lozza13-11-2026
- Sepp Kuss Vuelta 2023.Lozza13-11-2026
- they have no expertise with classics, they have no leaders in classics. the classics is dominated by the few Fuori Classe riders where other riders are left with scraps. the Hiring , the salaries dont make sense at all. Same problem as Man Utd. over paid players, egos, very little performanceabstractengineer13-11-2026
Loading
3 Comments