The judge, according to the sports code, must verify that there are "serious and consistent suspicions" that the specific riders have violated anti-doping rules or could do so. The judge must also determine a "risk of loss of evidence."
Vaughters, now CEO of WorldTour outfit EF Education-EasyPost, was a professional from 1994 to 2003 and rode with Lance Armstrong's US Postal for two seasons. In 2012, he publicly admitted to doping and claimed that there were many others in the sport who had done so.
Vaughters weighs-in on Pogacar and Vingegaard doping tests
Taking to social media in light of Pogacar and Vingegaard's overnight testing, Vaughters speculated potential reasons for the testing.
"I don’t post here much," Vaughters said
on Twitter/X."But I’ll roll this grenade down the aisle: 2am testing is one of the very effective ways to prevent peptide(EPO,hGH) and testosterone micro dosing."
However, Vaughters claimed that although he feels guilt for today's riders facing the additional spotlight after his generation's actions, he feels the tests could add credibility to the sport and riders.
"If UCI had tested us in 2001 at 2am? We’d all have been suspended and saved the sport 25 years of drama," he added.
"It’s unfortunate that Tadej and Jonas have to atone for the s**t we did. However, I’d take some lost sleep for some gained credibility. I should apologize to both of them, honestly."
Tadej Pogacar and Jonas Vingegaard
CPA release statement
On Monday, the CPA released a statement in response to the
nighttime tests, the riders' union has questioned the relevance of the procedure and noted the impact it would have on a rider's physical recovery during competition.
"Night-time testing raises questions about its relevance: Interrupting their rest in the middle of the night for testing now warrants serious consideration," read the CPA's statement.
"The Tour de France is a competition that demands exceptional physical effort. The quality of sleep and recovery is essential not only for performance but also for the health and safety of the riders. It is clear that this practice hinders athletes’ recovery during the most important and difficult race on the global calendar and runs counter to the intended objectives."
While stressing the importance of anti-doping control, the statement called for more targeted investment in scientific research and detection technology.
The statement added: "Cycling contributes approximately €10 million to funding the fight against doping within the International Testing Agency (ITA) for the collection and analysis of samples, while at the same time the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) spends, on average, only $5 million per year across all sports on basic research to develop new methods for detecting and identifying new doping substances.
"Would it not therefore be more appropriate to invest more in scientific research and detection technologies, rather than increasing the number of particularly intrusive unannounced tests?"