"I stand for the truth. I stand with Charlie Kirk" - Chloé Dygert's message at the Rwanda worlds and why the UCI might take action
Cycling
"Sports shouldn't be mixed with politics" is a stance that has been used a lot over the past few month in pro cycling due to the effects of the anti-Israel protests that have happened at the Vuelta a España. The UCI itself has asked to separate the two and maintain cycling away from politics. Now a rider, Chloé Dygert, has used her bike to send a political message at the World Championships, reigniting a debate on whether there should be consequences or not.
During the Vuelta a España, mass protests on Spanish roads forced organizers to neutralize or outright cancel three out of the 21 stages, whilst many others were affected. Riders were insulted, assaulted, endangered frequently and several also crashed due to road blockings - which brought consequences to the peloton as a whole and were rarely directly related to Israel - Premier Tech, the target of the protests. This is due to the current actions of Israel in the Gaza Strip and West Bank, and the lack of action from many Western countries.
At the time, the Vuelta organizers did not remove the team from the race, and argued they could not, with the governing body of the sport being the one with the power to make such a decision. But the UCI strongly criticized the protests whilst lending no solution to the problem that had come up. "The UCI strongly condemns the exploitation of sport for political purposes in general, and especially coming from a government. Sport must remain autonomous to fulfil its role as a tool for peace."
At the elite women's time-trial event, American rider and twice a former World Champion Chloé Dygert rode the event with a large sticker on the right fork of her bike saying "I stand for the truth. I stand with Charlie Kirk." The question now remains on whether the UCI will take action against the American rider or comment on the situation.
Read also

The positioning of the sticker made it evident that Dygert looked to send her message across. @Imago
Whilst this was not immediately captured by the TV broadcast, pictures later released from the event showed Dygert's bike with a very clear sticker on her right fork, where it was most visible. Charlie Kirk was an American far-right political activist, known for his role in sharing conservative values towards the younger generations in the country.
The UCI's very own Code of Ethics reads: “The persons bound by the Code shall not undertake any action, use any denigratory words, or any other means, that offend the human dignity of a person or group of persons, on any grounds, including bot not limited to skin colour, race, religion, ethnic or social origin, political opinion, sexual orientation, disability or any other reason contrary to human dignity.”
Kirk he was best known for his strong stances against LGBT rights, abortion, gun control; his often clear xenophobic and homophobic views; and for directly aiding the election of Donald Trump as president of the United States in the most recent presidential elections. This would strongly go against the UCI's stance on what riders are obliged to follow.
His assassination earlier this month became a top story in the United States, and Dygert's use of the 'I stand for the truth' words are a strongly politically charged message. Furthermore Dygert has in the past been involved in other controversies regarding her political views, giving further depth towards this episode.
Read also

Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
9 Comments







