"I just wasn't good enough": Danny Van Poppel reverts to lead-out role despite earlier sprint ambitions as Meeus partnership thrives again
Cycling
Danny van Poppel has returned to a familiar role as elite lead-out man for Jordi Meeus, despite having previously outlined ambitions to pursue more personal sprint opportunities in 2026. The current Dutch national champion, who recently guided Meeus to victory at the Brussels Cycling Classic, has reflected on a season shaped by setbacks and a renewed focus on teamwork within Red Bull - BORA - hansgrohe.
A disrupted spring forces a tactical reset
Van Poppel had entered the season with a clear intention to explore his own sprinting chances after winning the Dutch national title against top-tier rivals such as Olav Kooij and Dylan Groenewegen. However, illness, injuries, and missed opportunities disrupted that trajectory and forced a rethink.
“I just wasn't good enough,” Van Poppel told Wielerflits. “I had some injuries and illness. That can happen in your career, I guess.”
Read also
That reset led to discussions with team management about redefining his role within the squad, particularly after a Giro d’Italia plan built around his sprint ambitions did not materialise. “Then I sat down with Zak Dempster and we said that above all, we want to score again,” he said. “In recent weeks I have ridden a lot with Jordi Meeus and that is great racing. We have sprinted a lot and won a lot.”
Although Van Poppel is once again primarily seen in lead-out duty, he insists his role is no longer strictly defined and can still include selective sprint opportunities depending on race situations.
“I’m going to alternate a bit, one time as a sprinter and the other as a lead-out,” he said. “I’m slightly better uphill than Jordi. If he’s not in the mix one time, I’ll sprint myself. But the goal is to pilot Jordi. It’s been going very well for a few weeks now.”

Danny van Poppel in action at the Tour de France 2024
A partnership rebuilt on trust and timing
Van Poppel and Meeus have re-established a highly efficient sprint dynamic, with clear mutual understanding developed through years of racing together. That chemistry, Van Poppel says, is now a key competitive advantage in bunch sprints.
“We know what we have in each other,” he said. “He gives me peace of mind, and I give that back to him. We know each other inside out. Jordi is a smart sprinter, understands exactly how it works, and always follows me.”
“If you have a good bond off the bike, you see that in the race too. Things are finally going well again now, and we have something planned together.” That plan may extend into major objectives such as the Tour de France, where both riders could again form part of the team’s sprint structure.
Despite stepping back from sprint leadership for now, Van Poppel still reflects positively on his national title, even if he is realistic about replicating that success.
“I enjoyed it very much; everything I achieved is, of course, a nice bonus,” he said. “I never thought I would become Dutch champion. And the way it happened too: sometimes someone wins with team tactics, but that wasn't the case for me. We are going to try to do it again, but I’m not counting on it.”

Félix SernaCycling Journalist
Félix Serna is a writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2025. He covers professional cycling across both the men’s and women’s calendars, with a focus on UCI rankings, race developments, and rider performance. His work includes interview-based reports, liveblogs, and tournament coverage designed to provide clear, accurate context throughout the season.
In his reporting, Félix regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical reference. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. He holds a bachelor’s degree in International Studies.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment






