While praising the peaceful marches that characterised much of the race — “It was wonderful to see so many people with Palestinian flags, whole families demonstrating calmly” — Contador felt the escalation in Madrid marked a line. “I don’t know to what extent it was the best way of expressing the protest,” he added.
The finale in the capital proved chaotic, with large-scale blockades preventing the peloton from entering the city circuit, leaving organisers with no choice but to cancel the stage. Vuelta director
Javier Guillén later underlined that, as a private enterprise operating under
UCI rules, the race lacked any authority to exclude a team on political grounds — a point echoed by Contador, who stressed the “huge effort” involved in staging a three-week Grand Tour.
For Contador, the more troubling legacy of Madrid lies beyond cycling. “The sad part is that this is leading to a polarisation that benefits no one,” he said, describing a social divide that has deepened in Spain since the Vuelta’s tumultuous conclusion.
The fallout continues to reverberate across the sport, with organisers of other Spanish races such as O Gran Camiño already signalling they will not extend invitations to
Israel - Premier Tech in 2026. Against that backdrop, Contador’s words add the perspective of a champion who has experienced La Vuelta from inside the peloton and now from the commentary booth — a reminder of just how fragile cycling’s major races can be when they collide with politics on the streets.