
Wout van Aert is very likely going to race the Giro d'Italia next year but the overall classification is likely to be too much of a stretch. The Jumbo-Visma rider has further discussed his view in a recent interview.
“Suppose if I were to go, then I would prefer to go for stages. I don't see limits easily, but I am realistic. Riding a classification cannot really be combined with the other things I want. Maybe it can be done if I sacrifice a lot, but I don't want that," van Aert shared with De Rode Lantaarn. The 'other things' remain the cobbled classics, and van Aert's full focus will be on them throughout the spring.
Read also
Between Paris-Roubaix and the Giro there is less than a month. For once, that is little time to do specific training for a Grand Tour, taking into consideration that van Aert will peak for the cobbled classics and then will require some rest. Combining the two goals with maximum focus is not possible and so he has made his choice already. “For example, I can finish fifth, but if I have to lose weight for that, have to spend a long time on an altitude training course and am bored, then I don't think it's worth it," he argues.
"Now I do a lot of different things that I find cool and where I get satisfaction from being able to combine them. If I have ranking ambitions, it is not to win, that's how realistic I am. Then it is not worth the sacrifices." Ultimately, this seals the rumour that he will be going to the Giro with full focus on the pink jersey. It wouldn't be a big surprise however if he were to test himself, as he will not have the Tour de France ahead that will require him to save himself. If Van Aert starts off the race strong and nets the wins he hopes to achieve, then within a low-pressure lineup he could still see how far he can go.
Read also
However fighting for the win is unrealistic, specially for a rider of his weight, who will at some point struggle in the brutal Italian mountains. He admits that he may have the capacity to fight for a minor spot but it does not motivate him: “I think a lot is possible, but I am also realistic. For myself, my plans have always been feasible. It's about winning or winning together. If I start for a place of honor, that appeals to me less than winning races.”
Read also

Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
🇧🇪 Wout van Aert had a chat with the podcast “De Rode Lantaarn”. 🗣️ “If…If I would start in the #Giro, I would like to go for stage wins. I am realistic, riding a GC isn’t combinable with the Classics. I don’t want to sacrifice the Classics.” (Cor Vos)
2 Comments









