DISCUSSION Vuelta a España Stage 5 | Should team time trials be limited to the opening stage?
Cycling
The fifth
stage of the Vuelta a España featured a flat team time trial, an unconventional
discipline that is barely seen at the World Tour level.
Lotto were
the first team to commence, setting a solid time that teams such as Jayco or Bahrain,
on paper better prepared for a TTT than Lotto, couldn’t beat. Lidl -Trek was
the first team amongst the favourites to start the TT effort, with a very
strong lineup that smashed the best time, even if they lost Carlos Verona due
to a crash.
After them,
Ineos did a powerful first half of the TTT and took the lead at the
intermediate sections. However, they collapsed in the second half and were not able
to outperform Lidl – Trek, finishing fifth overall.
Red Bull - Bora and Israel were also threatening Lidl – Trek’s reign, but Matteo Sobrero’s
nasty crash on the one hand and a pro-Palestine demonstration on the other
threw away their options to fight for the stage win.
The two
main favourites were UAE and Visma and they proved why, finishing first and second
respectively. Despite never leading at the intermediate points, both teams finished
off really strong and topped the classification, with Lidl – Trek being third.
Race leader
David Gaudu and his team Groupama FDJ were nowhere near the top teams, losing
24 seconds to the winner and losing the red jersey, which is back on Vingegaard’s
shoulders.
Once the stage finished, we asked some of our writers to share their thoughts and main takeaways about what happened today.
Read also
Rúben Silva (CyclingUpToDate)
All as expected I would say. UAE had the upper hand on Visma because they had an extra man and the truth is that the super teams are always going to be on top in the TTT's because of the money they invest in the discipline.
Long gone are the days where a specialist like Cancellara could almost single-handedly carry a team to victory in such a stage. Vingegaard returns to red as expected and nothing in the race dynamic has really changed I would say.
Pascal Michiels (RadSportAktuell)
The team time trial was certainly spectacular, and it might have been even better had it lasted a little longer. The obvious question everyone is asking is what happened to Visma in the first and second intermediate sections. In the final stretch, however, they flew, especially considering that UAE managed to gain 14 seconds on Lidl-Trek there.
Visma then outperformed UAE by another five seconds in that same section, riding nearly 20 seconds faster than Lidl-Trek! Was it a tactical choice? Or did something happen at the start? We’ll find out soon enough.

Visma | Lease a Bike riders cooling off before the TTT
Juan López (CiclismoAlDía)
Although Rúben Silva (maybe that’s why he’s the best at previews) was right in picking UAE as the favorite, honestly I didn’t expect Ayuso, Almeida and company to beat teams that I thought were stronger in the time trial, like Visma, Lidl-Trek or INEOS.
I think the wind hurt Lidl, who were overtaken by several squads in the final part. The race is looking beautiful right before the arrival of the high mountains, with Vingegaard ahead of Gianetti and Matxín’s two leaders.
Read also
Félix Serna (CyclingUpToDate)
UAE and Visma are just ahead of the competition, and we could see that today. In the case of Visma, it was even more impressive, because they were missing one rider (Axel Zingle abandoned a couple of days ago), so they were at a huge disadvantage.
Would the final outcome have been different had he started the stage? We will never know, but that disadvantage could have been easily avoided with one simple action: put the team time trial the first stage. That way you make sure every team will be in the same conditions, and no one will be missing some pieces, given that every team is complete the first day.
Today, five teams were unfairly affected: Visma, Movistar, Soudal, Groupama and Burgos were all missing one rider. In a discipline that is a team effort, as its name indicates, having one more or one less rider definitely has an impact. Why didn’t they choose the first stage for this instead of the fifth?
It is not a la Vuelta team time trial without bizarre incidents going on. Two years ago it was the infamous TTT finishing in the dark, today it was protesters blocking Israel – Premier Tech, besides of a random passerby trying to cross the street when Groupama – FDJ were coming. We don’t get bored during TTTs that is for sure.
Leaving that aside, the final results were the expected. The top five were the strongest teams on paper and the time differences were minimal, leaving the GC very open. One team that surprised me today was Movistar, because they didn’t come to the Vuelta with GC aspirations and their lineup is not the best it could be, missing time trial firepower. Still, they managed to finish 6th only 17 seconds slower than UAE.
Groupama – FDJ also did a solid time trial, losing just 24 seconds to UAE. Gaudu remains sixth 16 with 16 seconds lost to Vingegaard, I am really curious to see whether he will carry his so far excellent shape during the next weeks. He might be an underdog to fight at least for the podium.
On the other hand, Jayco Alula disappointed me. They have commonly put up strong performances in team time trials, but today it was not their day, losing 44 seconds. A major setback for Ben O’Connor, who finished in second place last year and came for the GC again.
And you? What are your thoughts about what happened today? Leave a comment and join the discussion!

Félix SernaCycling Journalist
Félix Serna is a writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2025. He covers professional cycling across both the men’s and women’s calendars, with a focus on UCI rankings, race developments, and rider performance. His work includes interview-based reports, liveblogs, and tournament coverage designed to provide clear, accurate context throughout the season.
In his reporting, Félix regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical reference. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. He holds a bachelor’s degree in International Studies.
claps 2visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- ANATOMY OF A G.O.A.T. EDDY MERCKX about TADEJ POGAČAR: Merckx: “He has revived a style of cycling that we had almost forgotten. He is now better than me.” Key statements by Merckx about Pogačar in 2026: - Acknowledging his superiority: This time, Merckx openly admitted, without any subsequent backtracking or reservations, that Pogačar had surpassed him and was now above him. This contrasts with 2024, when he quickly softened his remarks about Pogačar being faster. - The possibility of a historic triple (Giro, Tour and Vuelta): During the July Tour de France (where Pogi claimed his fifth title), Merckx stated that Pogi was the only cyclist in history capable of winning all three Grand Tours (the Giro d'Italia, Tour de France and Vuelta a España) in a single season, provided the conditions were right and he had sufficient team support. - Lack of serious competition: Merckx emphasised that Pogačar has no real rivals in the mountains since 2024, thanks to his extraordinary climbing ability and the fact that he continues to improve despite still being under 28 (he turned 28 in autumn 2026). - Praise for his racing style: Merckx highlighted how Pogačar is bringing back the aggressive, uncompromising spirit of cycling's golden era, when races were not merely about calculated stages and tactical conservatism, but about attacking from long distances. PS: This is not "boring" ... this is called making real history, not only statistical history. Capish?PogiSloFans09-11-2026
- It’s off-season mate, I’m bored and fed up with the mediocrity of people unwilling to provoke change when they admit things aren’t right. What have you done lately to make anyone realise you won’t put up with things? What conversation, are you dictating to me which part of the incident I have to be interested in or telling me other parts are taboo? That’s what I guess the UCI would really like, let them moan, let it blow over for them pass on to the next thing, let’s keep the status quo, let’s try our best not reviewing or revealing anything about decision-making just like every time before, they’re used to it by now so we can take the risk they’ll never give us grief.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- As far as CUTD headlines go this is far from the worst. It helps if you look at it twice and realise it’s a list of descriptions from distinct events. You can’t deny the reality of being a rival if you consider the picture immediately below, frontrunner is unfortunate but I’m guessing this time it’s more a linguistic failure than a clickbaiting opportunity. Just a reminder that this is not an anglo website, for those who find it too tedious to interpret text to get the gist of things which are rarely of great importance (as opposed to eg purposely biaised DOJ extradition translations in order to achieve hidden agendas), there are plenty of anglo cycling websites google can suggest.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Ah, finally someone willing to be a bit proactive.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- So? Do you understand the way instructions, decisions and authority work? Do you think in a football match if after a match (or even after play has gone on) a player tells the referee he did touch the ball with his hands when the referee didn’t award opponents a penalty that they will revise the score or force a replay? You really don’t get my point, it’s not against the rider but everyone here is so emotional for her they can’t get back to an issue which needs resolving for the future and the first step (or maybe second) is to try to understand how and why it happens, none of you have contributed in the least to that. All everyone is interested in is letting everyone know they agree how unjust it was, not even sure anyone thinks that could affect anything.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Shouldn’t you be in MOUrning?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Maybe you don’t like it and that’s fine, we all have different sensibilities and topics that touch us, but as you try to show me, it doesn’t hurt to reflect and compare ourselves to others behaving similarly. What precisely is the difference between a sports fan interested in every detail of his/her hero’s life and a celeb fan having the same hobby? It’s far more interesting to learn and think about how and why (which) people do things than reading about what they are actually doing. And just to add another level, maybe you’ll agree we don’t use the same value system for everyone, we discriminate in an enormous number of systematic ways. For example, when is the last time you saw a discussion arguing about the achievements of two politicians to compare or for that matter two business leaders apart from the comparison of hypothetical wealth accumulated? Perhaps you misunderstood the intention?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- I don’t think I know what’s beneath the surface but I am willing to think about it, discuss it, compare it to a known past, extrapolate to a potential future and ask/try to find out truth or even take action within my powers (boycotting something or someone is within EVERY person’s reach). If you think your attitude has more chance of changing a result, a process, a system or an institution or it just makes you feel good, keep at it but to me it looks like you’ve already given up before trying.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- All journalists should start asking the UCI uncomfortable questions, sending inquiries about the interpretation of the rules and the justification of the results. This is the only way to change anything.averagecyclist09-11-2026
- how else is there to look at things? we are responding to words and pictures, we are not there. your long winded replies make zero sense to anyone. pretty much everyone but you says the same thing. MS was robbed. somehow you think you're so smart to dig beneath the surface and discover something no one else, including the opposing coach and cyclist, saw. lol. you are a tool.mij09-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment








