
The third stage of the Tour de Suisse was another day with a hilltop finish in which puncheurs and GC riders were expected to fight for the victory.
Similarly to stage 2, the first half of the day was essentially flat, with all the categorized climbs gathered in the second half. Six riders went up the road and formed the breakaway of the day, with Nans Peters and Quinn Simmons as the top names.
Inside the last 50km, Geraint Thomas hit the deck while in the middle of the peloton, miraculously not causing anyone else to fall in the process. Although he looked in pain, he continued the race and tried to rejoin the peloton with the help of three teammates, although in vain.
The final sequence of climbs caused the gap of the break to decrease to exiguous 20 seconds, making it look like the winner should be in peloton. However, Quinn Simmons didn’t want to give up too easily, launching a big attack and flying away from his five breakaway companions.
The US national champion proved he is in terrific shape, outpacing the peloton and taking home an impressive solo win. João Almeida and Oscar Onley completed the podium after a tight sprint.
Once the stage finished, we asked some of our writers to share their thoughts and main takeaways about what happened today.
Read also
Víctor LF (CiclismoAlDía)
IMPRESSIVE performance by Quinn Simmons. We could talk about the lack of understanding in the peloton and that the riders have preferred to attack rather than agree to organize and hunt down the American, but I think it's a day to congratulate and take off our hats to what this 24-year-old rider has done.
Simmons has shown that he has the depth to make it big in major world-class races. He has withstood all the onslaughts that have come his way. When he attacked, the leading group was being hunted down. He increased the gap and held it until the end with a hard and complicated course. Congratulations Mr. Simmons!
Read also
Carlos Silva (CiclismoAtual)
Impressive display from Quinn Simmons. 193 kilometres on the run, to raise his arms with the US national champion's jersey and honour the memory of Gino Mader. It's clear that Groupama-FDJ doesn't have the team to control the peloton, a breakaway and Romain Grégoire is only wearing yellow because his rivals are waiting for the course to harden. It's a bore watching FDJ control the head of the peloton.
Today the breakaway got its revenge because FDJ and the main teams wanted it to. If the yellow jersey was on the body of a UAE, Visma, Lidl... the pace of the race would be very different. Tactically, none of them want to take over the race. Even Ben O'Connor and Jayco don't want to. They're all looking at one man. João Almeida.
But João Almeida needs to do what he did last year in the Tour de France. Tug on the ears and punch the table, especially his team-mate Jan Christen. I don't think the Swiss cyclist has any respect for his team-mates.
Yesterday it was Mikel Bjerg who was amazed by his team-mate's good legs at the end... but he was amazed that during the stage he didn't work. What about today's stage? I saw him attacking again when João Almeida was badly positioned on the climb to the finish line. He doesn't work and attacks at the most inopportune moments. He does what he wants because he's egotistical and has a huge ego, he lacks humility.
Read also
Félix Serna (CyclingUpToDate)
Great ride by Quinn Simmons! Very few could have expected the break to succeed after being in front the whole day and barely holding a 20-second lead at some point. Third win for the American this season, he is knocking at the door of the team to ask for a spot at the Tour de France.
João Almeida proved he is in great shape as expected, launching a timely sprint and beating riders such as Romain Grégoire, who should be way more explosive and have a faster sprint than the Portuguese on paper.
Today wasn’t even a day suiting Almeida, who prefers the high mountains and longer efforts instead of short and explosive ones, yet he beat everyone else in the group. He could have most likely stolen some seconds off the leader and some other GC contenders if the team had worked for him, but that never happened. It is becoming ridiculous, they have come to the Tour de Suisse with the outright favourite to win the GC, but they have not behaved as a team yet.
After a disastrous first stage in which peloton allowed a huge group with a few potential GC contenders to gain more than 2 minutes, UAE doesn’t have the luxury to give up opportunities to recover some time, and today could have been one of them. There are not proper high mountain stages this edition, so it won't be as easy for Almeida to unleash his full power.
Jan Christen rode selfishly for the second consecutive day. Who knows whether his move was planned and agreed with the team beforehand, but the timing couldn’t have been worse. He attacked when Almeida was not in a good position in the bunch. What was the point of that?
He could have provoked a cut that affected his leader at a crucial moment of the stage. And all that after ignoring the team orders yesterday. As arguably the best domestique climber that is present in the race to help Almeida, he should be behaving as such. But it seems the word domestique is not in his vocabulary. Maybe he went to the same school as Juan Ayuso.
UAE keeps making clear that not everyone in the team is riding for the common goal, which should be helping Almeida win the GC. Instead, they are just running around like a headless chicken. Poor João.
And you? What are your thoughts about what happened today? Leave a comment and join the discussion!

Félix SernaCycling Journalist
Félix Serna is a writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2025. He covers professional cycling across both the men’s and women’s calendars, with a focus on UCI rankings, race developments, and rider performance. His work includes interview-based reports, liveblogs, and tournament coverage designed to provide clear, accurate context throughout the season.
In his reporting, Félix regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical reference. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. He holds a bachelor’s degree in International Studies.
claps 2visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- lol yeahmij08-11-2026
- I know, their headlines can be so misleading. Pidcock had a great season with 5 wins. and some solid 2nds. no reason to take away from that with a fake headline.mij08-11-2026
- You can clearly see the the posture change from slightly sitting to again out of the saddle while changing of gears in the video of the sprintabstractengineer08-11-2026
- He has already beaten Pogi twice in the TDF. the achievement is over. He cannot beat Pogi now and he only has a few years left at the top. Win Giro and compete in the TDF, maximise palmares.abstractengineer08-11-2026
- Just looked again at the photo. Yeah I stand by that. If MS had fallen over in Brands direction I don’t even think she would have hit her. You must be a UCI race commissioner. I’ll be sure to check my sock height should I ever see you on a ride. Looks like everyone else on here sees what I see.mij08-11-2026
- I said looking at the photo it doesn’t appear she deviated. Chill out, not stating my word is the final judgement. Just commenting that based on the photo I don’t see it. And BTW the Dutch coach even said she didn’t impede her.mij08-11-2026
- Blah Blah Blah !frieders308-11-2026
- MS said she was changing gears so that caused her slight deviation. Nothing was intentional.frieders308-11-2026
- How can you use a photo post incident to judge the incident itself (which is not hard to find if you’re prepared to invest the same amount of time in searching as writing that comment? It’s harsh but technically right even though this or worse is not always sanctioned in every race. The two things that went against MS (who unfortunately for her would still have won without making her mistake) are that it was not a bunch sprint where there could have been an overlooked incident or mitigating circumstances explaining a deviation. Everything was focused on just those 2, Schreiber was riding beautifully balanced which made her sudden deviation look unnatural stroke as if it could have been in some part intentional whilst she was slowly drifting ever closer towards the barrier to a point that would have reached obstruction level. In her defence, it might have been the realisation she was heading towards that that made her react suddenly and caused the deviation involuntarily. In any case, congratulations to her for the ride of her life, in people’s minds she will be credited for it.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- Good boy Obviously doesn’t need that much help dealing with pressure, as some have suggested. Wiser (and humbler) than many far further along their careers. About offering him the moon, recently someone came up with an explanation of the downfall of a football great (either referring to Maradona or Portuguese Ronaldo) saying it was kind of normal after coming back from the moon, except that others, including some who actually did go to the moon like Armstrong (Neil in case anyone is too switched off to realise) didn’t go through any of the same motions after coming back. A lot of how you deal with situations has less to do with the situation than with your character.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment








