
Stage 7 of the Tour de France featured another
hilly day, with a final ascent to the Mûr-de-Bretagne, the climb where Mathieu van
der Poel obtained an impressive win back in 2021, in a stage where Pogacar came
in second position. Not much has changed since then, as the two stars were
coming as the main favourites again. The Dutchman was looking to defend his
yellow jersey, as only one second distanced him from the World Champion Pogacar.
The day began at a rapid pace, marking one of
the fastest start times in recent memory, as the riders achieved an average
speed of 53.7 km/h during the first hour of competition. The fight for the
breakaway was intense, with teams like Visma | Lease a Bike consistently
launching attacks to secure a spot in the front group.
However, just 5 riders managed to make it to
the breakaway, those being Ewen Costiou, Iván García Cortina, Marco Haller, Alex
Baudin, and Tour de France winner Geraint Thomas.
The peloton controlled the gap very well and didn’t
let the front group obtain a lead of over 2 minutes. Alpecin and UAE were the
two teams pulling in the peloton during the whole stage.
Van der Poel was dropped on the final climb to
the Mûr, unable to follow UAE’s fierce tempo, losing the yellow jersey to Pogacar,
the winner of a head-to-head sprint against Vingegaard.
The sad news of the day was a hard crash in the
peloton happening just 6 km from the finish line. Joao Almeida, Enric Mas, Santiago
Buitrago, and Jack Haig were among the riders affected.
Once the stage finished, we asked some of our writers to share their thoughts and main takeaways about what happened today.
Read also
Rúben Silva (CyclingUpToDate)
It was overall a day in which what was expected to happen, happened. There was quite an interesting breakaway fight actually which I didn't expect to see as much, but ultimately, UAE was completely focused on not letting it go and just chasing all day long to get the stage win. It made sense for the team not to push, not chase the yellow jersey and so avoid chasing duties (and podium ceremonies/interviews) that in the long term can be costly.
But there was no such reasoning. Despite giving away the yellow jersey yesterday they burned themselves today all day long to chase the breakaway, have seen João Almeida crash and fall out of GC contention... So they won the stage but they don't actually need it, neither did they need the 4 seconds gained on Jonas Vingegaard.
I could call the end of the stage a 'nothing burger'. It was quite interesting to see Visma pace very hard in the 1st climb up the Mur-de-Bretagne, and then UAE enter the final ascent with a gruelling pace - at least we didn't have just a regular leadout for Pogacar all the way to the finish - but it was obvious that Pogacar would sprint to victory ahead of Vingegaard; and it also looked quite obvious from early in the penultimate climb that van der Poel would crack. Elsewhere, all was as expected.
Read also
Víctor LF (CiclismoAlDía)
Tadej Pogacar was expected to win and regain the yellow jersey and he did. The worst news for him and UAE Team Emirates XRG was the crash of João Almeida at the finish.
The finish was indeed too hard for Mathieu van der Poel and Jonas Vingegaard was again the one who held off Pogacar the most but he doesn't have that kind of speed in finishes like that. Nevertheless, great attitude of the Dane and Visma - Lease a Bike, and very good performance also by Remco Evenepoel.
As for the Spaniards and Movistar Team, Enric Mas was involved in the crash, but luckily he got up very quickly and only lost 50 seconds at the finish. On the contrary, Colombian Santiago Buitrago, who has been one of the worst losers and says goodbye to any dream of achieving a great result in the final general classification.
Read also
Ivan Silva (CiclismoAtual)
Well, about the profile itself. I keep hating this stages with plenty of flat sections until the first uphill sections. Quite hard to make a breakaway, and i'm surprised today we actually had one. Apart from that I think race went as expected with the main group fighting for the win at the finish.
There is an elephant in the room though, which is the crash. João Almeida was considered to be a serious podium contender but now it seems his hopes faded with the crash, hard to accept but hopefully he'll be able to continue the race and still be helpfull to his team leader.
This does change the complexity of the race, and even more if he eventually DNS's tomorrow. Visma will have the tendency to gain the numbers advantage over Emirates as João was the ace on Pogacar's sleeve. Losing João could definitely be a game changing moment on the race.
Read also
Félix Serna (CyclingUpToDate)
Considering the clear interest Pogacar showed
in avoiding wearing any jersey leader these past days, it was honestly quite
surprising to see UAE controlling the race for him. He didn’t have the need to
do that, but for some reason, the team decided to go for it.
Once it was clear UAE wanted the victory, the
final outcome was very predictable. Pogacar was the huge favourite in a finish
like that and he delivered with ease. It was a good sign seeing Vingegaard
holding to his wheel, even if he was never close to overcoming Tadej. His team
tried something today once again, with Simon Yates pacing hard in the first
pass to the Mûr. Visma’s tactics have been refreshing, they have been showing a
much more offensive mentality compared to the previous years.
The breakaway formation was particularly
interesting. We saw Victor Campenaerts and Wout van Aert actively pushing to be
part of it, but UAE was clearly showing no intention to let any of them escape.
Yesterday, it was Simon Yates the one to be in the breakaway, and we even saw
Jorgenson trying to attack at the beginning of the stage. They know they need a
different approach if they want to have a chance, especially because Pogacar
looks completely untouchable, and I believe they are making the right decision.
Almeida’s crash will have a huge impact on the
race, even if he doesn’t end up abandoning. UAE and Visma started the Tour with
a very similar team potential, so losing the Portuguese should lean the balance
in favour of Visma as a team. Almeida is Pogacar’s strongest domestique in the
mountains. We saw it on stage 4, where he closed all the gaps after Evenepoel’s
attack.
The first week of the race hasn’t featured any
truly mountainous stages. But once the real climbs arrive, UAE could find
themselves short-handed. João Almeida has been crucial so far, and there
doesn’t seem to be another teammate capable of stepping up in the same way.
Adam Yates doesn’t appear to be at his best, which could put Visma in a
stronger position. With both Jorgenson and Vingegaard in good shape, they might
have a tactical advantage when the high mountains come into play. Everyone
remembers how Vingegaard’s first Tour was won, so Visma should aim to repeat
that tactic; they already know how to execute it.
The Bora duo keeps showing they are not in top
shape yet. I didn’t expect Roglic to be at Pogacar's or Vingegaard’s level, but I
definitely expected more from him during the first week of the race, as the
high mountains have not come yet.
I am particularly disappointed at Roglic for
one reason: these are the kind of stages that have typically suited him the
best. He has always been so good at this sort of explosive, short climbs. I am
sure if the 2020 Tour de France had had this profile, he wouldn’t have lost
that Tour in the last stage to Pogacar. But yes, these are all speculations.
Finally, if you had asked me a couple of weeks
ago, Kévin Vauquelin and Oscar Onley were not two of the riders I was expecting
to see that high in the leaderboard at this point in the race. Great job by
both of them, they are showing us that their performance at the Tour de Suisse
was not just luck.
And you? What are your thoughts about what
happened today? Leave a comment and join the discussion!

Félix SernaCycling Journalist
Félix Serna is a writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2025. He covers professional cycling across both the men’s and women’s calendars, with a focus on UCI rankings, race developments, and rider performance. His work includes interview-based reports, liveblogs, and tournament coverage designed to provide clear, accurate context throughout the season.
In his reporting, Félix regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical reference. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. He holds a bachelor’s degree in International Studies.
claps 14visitors 4
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment









