The Angliru is cycling’s great equalizer, a brutal wall of
asphalt that strips away any illusion of comfort for even the strongest
climbers. Its maximum gradients tilt toward 25%, while the final six kilometers
average over 13%. Over two decades of history at the Vuelta, the climb has
consistently defied those who carry the leader’s jersey into its slopes.
Vingegaard became the latest to learn the lesson. Despite arriving in red after
2 victories in the race so far, he could not match Almeida’s finishing kick and
had to settle for second.
What do the numbers say?
“Win? You’ll have to beat Jonas,” Joao Almeida had said a
day earlier, acknowledging the weight of expectation on Vingegaard’s shoulders.
“That will be a tough task. Hopefully, I have good legs.” He backed up that
statement on the hardest road of them all, and defeated the two time Tour de
France champion. His victory is now written into the Angliru’s lore, alongside
a roll call of riders who have shown that being the race leader is more curse
than blessing on its slopes.
The numbers are striking. In 1999, Abraham Olano wore red
but finished only fifth on the Angliru. The following year, Robert Heras placed
third, unable to seal the climb despite his reputation as one of the best in
the mountains. Oscar Sevilla’s 11th place in 2002 continued the trend, while
Egoi Martínez faded to 23rd in 2008. Even all-time greats have been humbled
here: Chris Froome could manage only third in 2017, Chris Horner came second in
2013, Bradley Wiggins was fifth in 2011, and Primoz Roglic ended up fifth in
2020. When Sepp Kuss wore red in 2023, he crossed the line third. Now in 2025,
Jonas Vingegaard has finished second.
Each edition reinforces the same conclusion: no matter how
dominant, the man in red has never conquered the Angliru itself. The pattern
demonstrates more than coincidence, it shows just how punishing and
unpredictable the climb is.
The tactical dynamic highlighted another truth of the
Angliru: timing matters as much as raw power. Many leaders have approached the
climb wary of overextending themselves, especially with days still to come in
the Vuelta. But that caution has cost them the chance to etch their names into
the Angliru’s history. Almeida’s victory shows that boldness, not conservatism,
is often rewarded. But will he pay for that effort in the coming days?
Vingegaard could not take a third stage win of the 2025 Vuelta
For Vingegaard, finishing second still protected his general
classification ambitions. He remains in control of the red jersey, but his fans
left the mountain with questions about his choices. Why did he not attack?
Could he have changed the outcome with a more aggressive approach? In the
moment, Almeida proved that waiting for the inevitable attack can be the right
move if the attack never arrives.
Riders who have won here, Roberto Heras in 2002, Alberto
Contador in 2008, Primoz Roglic in 2023, are among the true legends of our
sport, and Almeida has written his name amonstg the greats in Angliru. His
victory will be remembered not only because it came against Vingegaard, but
because it extended the stat that defines the climb’s role in Vuelta history.
But really, it was the day the Portuguese rider announced himself as elite.
Do you think Vingegaard chose not to attack, or did Almeida’s
pace simply exhaust him? And can Almeida take the red jersey from Vingegaard in
the coming days? Let us know in the comments below.