ANALYSIS | João Almeida's win over Vingegaard on the Angliru continues a crazy Vuelta a Espana stat
Cycling
The Alto de l’Angliru once again lived up to its fearsome
reputation on Friday’s Vuelta a Espana stage 13. Joao Almeida stunned Jonas
Vingegaard to take victory on the iconic Asturian climb, and in doing so, the
Portuguese rider extended one of the strangest statistical streaks in modern
cycling. According to Cycling Statistics, every single time the Vuelta a España
has tackled the Angliru, the race leader on the day has failed to win. Thanks
to Joao Almeida that rule held firm once again in 2025.
This was the biggest win of Almeida’s career to date, there
is no doubt about that. For a long time he has been seen as one of the world’s
best climbers, and a potential GC podium threat. Today, he elevated himself
into the elite category. Jonas Vingegaard has a problem on his hands, and
Almeida is keeping the fight for red alive.
Almeida was not only celebrating his own win, but reflecting
on how his rival had chosen to ride. “I was waiting for an attack anytime,”
Almeida admitted after crossing the line first. “I was surprised with Jonas’
conservativism in the showdown.” Those words summed up the surprise felt by
many in the peloton and by fans who had expected the Dane to go on the
offensive on one of the toughest climbs in professional cycling. But maybe,
Vingegaard simply couldn’t attack.
The Angliru is cycling’s great equalizer, a brutal wall of
asphalt that strips away any illusion of comfort for even the strongest
climbers. Its maximum gradients tilt toward 25%, while the final six kilometers
average over 13%. Over two decades of history at the Vuelta, the climb has
consistently defied those who carry the leader’s jersey into its slopes.
Vingegaard became the latest to learn the lesson. Despite arriving in red after
2 victories in the race so far, he could not match Almeida’s finishing kick and
had to settle for second.
Read also
What do the numbers say?
“Win? You’ll have to beat Jonas,” Joao Almeida had said a
day earlier, acknowledging the weight of expectation on Vingegaard’s shoulders.
“That will be a tough task. Hopefully, I have good legs.” He backed up that
statement on the hardest road of them all, and defeated the two time Tour de
France champion. His victory is now written into the Angliru’s lore, alongside
a roll call of riders who have shown that being the race leader is more curse
than blessing on its slopes.
The numbers are striking. In 1999, Abraham Olano wore red
but finished only fifth on the Angliru. The following year, Robert Heras placed
third, unable to seal the climb despite his reputation as one of the best in
the mountains. Oscar Sevilla’s 11th place in 2002 continued the trend, while
Egoi Martínez faded to 23rd in 2008. Even all-time greats have been humbled
here: Chris Froome could manage only third in 2017, Chris Horner came second in
2013, Bradley Wiggins was fifth in 2011, and Primoz Roglic ended up fifth in
2020. When Sepp Kuss wore red in 2023, he crossed the line third. Now in 2025,
Jonas Vingegaard has finished second.
Each edition reinforces the same conclusion: no matter how
dominant, the man in red has never conquered the Angliru itself. The pattern
demonstrates more than coincidence, it shows just how punishing and
unpredictable the climb is.
The tactical dynamic highlighted another truth of the
Angliru: timing matters as much as raw power. Many leaders have approached the
climb wary of overextending themselves, especially with days still to come in
the Vuelta. But that caution has cost them the chance to etch their names into
the Angliru’s history. Almeida’s victory shows that boldness, not conservatism,
is often rewarded. But will he pay for that effort in the coming days?

Vingegaard could not take a third stage win of the 2025 Vuelta
Read also
For Vingegaard, finishing second still protected his general
classification ambitions. He remains in control of the red jersey, but his fans
left the mountain with questions about his choices. Why did he not attack?
Could he have changed the outcome with a more aggressive approach? In the
moment, Almeida proved that waiting for the inevitable attack can be the right
move if the attack never arrives.
Riders who have won here, Roberto Heras in 2002, Alberto
Contador in 2008, Primoz Roglic in 2023, are among the true legends of our
sport, and Almeida has written his name amonstg the greats in Angliru. His
victory will be remembered not only because it came against Vingegaard, but
because it extended the stat that defines the climb’s role in Vuelta history.
But really, it was the day the Portuguese rider announced himself as elite.
Do you think Vingegaard chose not to attack, or did Almeida’s
pace simply exhaust him? And can Almeida take the red jersey from Vingegaard in
the coming days? Let us know in the comments below.
Read also
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 3visitors 3
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Are you MrMauMau 2.0? Nothing you are saying is really relevant. Vaguely connected, but irrelevant. The conversation is whether Schreiber impeded Brand or not.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment










