Latest comments
- I agree. Some teams think riding on the front gives them special powers. It doesn't. All it does is use up resources. Seems like the old traditions and tactics due hard lol. Chris is absolutely right beyond a reasonable doubt
- I was referring to pre-race to be more precise
- Sometimes yes, sometimes no, there have been races where he’s been peculiarly unresponsive to challenges
- Alot of people thought it was equal after Stage 11. Obviously the bookies put Vingegaard above Pogačar after stage 11, because they are designed for the company to win.
- Solution: 5 different races, one for each discipline, just like in track cycling. One each for TTT, ITT, Flat (Sprint), Hilly (Classic), Mountain (Climbing).
- Van der Poel can sustain a super high power, that's how he won Paris-Roubaix (though his superb bike handling was equally important). That's why I think he could potentially play an important role for GC, just like Wout has done
- Yes, that is quite obvious (not wanting to be patronising), but everyone knows how similar Van Aert and Van der Poel are - and yet they have different roles, in which they are very successful. Van der Poel has said that he doesn't have the liking for the Tour de France grind, unlike Van Aert
- Some riders mature later than others, he's Tadej's age, so maybe he is starting to find his best form.
- Don’t follow these guys much but don’t recall many tipping for Jonas the times he won. Only a fool would say it’s out of the question.
- AND lead-out for the sprinter? I think in the mountains Wout is a little more useful (and probably enjoys climbing a bit more) and generally that’s where it counts in GTs