Wout van Aert reveals he lost his Garmin during the cyclocross World Championships: "“It was only when I wanted to press the finish that I noticed it was gone"
Cyclocross
Wout van Aert secured second place behind his arch-rival
Mathieu van der Poel at the 2025 Cyclocross World Championships in Liévin. The
Belgian was unable to claim his fourth world title and his first since 2018,
meaning his wait for another rainbow jersey continues.
Despite falling short of victory, the 30-year-old remained
upbeat and even had an unexpected moment of goodwill during the day. After
completing his post-race interviews in the mixed zone, Van Aert was reunited
with his Garmin watch, thanks to two young French children who had found it on
the course. Interestingly, the silver medalist had not even realised he had
lost it.
“It was only when I wanted to press the finish that I
noticed it was gone,” Van Aert told VTM Nieuws about the missing watch.
During the final lap of the championship race, the device had slipped off his
wrist unnoticed
Curious about where it had been found, the Team Visma | Lease a
Bike rider took a moment to chat with the children and express his gratitude.
As a token of appreciation, he posed for a photo with them and his recovered
watch. “There are still honest people, that's nice to see,” he said.
With the cyclocross season wrapped up, Van Aert now shifts
his focus to the road. His main targets will be the spring classics, where he
hopes to finally secure victory at the Tour of Flanders or Paris-Roubaix as he
looks to finally win a second monument. Additionally, he will contest the Giro
d'Italia for the first time and go in search of stage wins, before turning his
attention to supporting Jonas Vingegaard at the Tour de France in July.
After an injury hit 2024, and a stop start winter campaign,
Van Aert will be happy with his silver medal and hoping that 2025 will see him
return to his magnificent best.
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 3visitors 3
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment