“It was really to the limit, or beyond” – Vanthourenhout conquers Nieuwenhuis to win Superprestige opener
Cyclocross
Michael Vanthourenhout had an excellent start to the Superprestige series, securing a hard-fought victory in the opening round in Ruddervoorde. He narrowly defeated Joris Nieuwenhuis in a sprint, and got his second victory of the season, after winning the Swiss Cyclocross Cup #1 - Internationales Radquer Steinmaur on October 12.
"It was really to the limit, or beyond," said an exhausted Vanthourenhout in the post-race interview in comments gathered by Wieler Flits. "But when you win, it’s always good."
Vanthourenhout passed Dutch racer Joris Nieuwenhuis during the sand section of the course, not far from the finish line. "I thought he dismounted fairly early and was walking slowly up the sand. I thought: I’ll try to pass him just before the barriers. From there, it was all or nothing."
Nieuwenhuis had initially made an attempt to break away during the race, and it was not easy at for Vanthourenhout to catch him. "I thought he was riding really fast. We had to work with three or four guys to close that gap. I think Joran (Wyseure) was the one to close the final gap. Then I knew everything would be decided in the last lap. You had to be the first or second rider to come out of the sandpit."
Vanthourenhout hadn’t won in Ruddervoorde before, and this race is special for him for personal reasons. "It’s always been a race I enjoy going to. It’s only ten kilometers from my parents' house, so it’s nice to check this one off the list."
Read also
Nieuwenhuis satisfied with his performance despite defeat
Joris Nieuwenhuis, who finished in second place, was also content with his race performance. "I did exactly what I wanted to do: race," said the Dutchman from Ridley Racing Team. "Richard (team manager Richard Groenendaal) didn’t like that we were all looking at each other. He said: 'I want you to try to go all out just once.' And I tried to do that."
The Dutch rider also talked about the race tactics and how hard the day was for all the riders. "I also thought that if I had a gap, hopefully they would start looking at each other behind me. But they kept pushing hard. Then I thought: now they’re coming back and will go right past me because they were able to sit in the draft. But they were also worn out. It was a tough race. We raced hard from the first lap to the last."
When asked about the sand section, where Vanthourenhout passed him, Nieuwenhuis admitted to feeling the toll of the race. "I had already given a lot, so I was pretty much in the red by the time I hit the sand. I might have had another chance after that, because I was still on his wheel, but I just couldn't recover. It was over," he concluded.
Read also
Read also

Félix SernaCycling Journalist
Félix Serna is a writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2025. He covers professional cycling across both the men’s and women’s calendars, with a focus on UCI rankings, race developments, and rider performance. His work includes interview-based reports, liveblogs, and tournament coverage designed to provide clear, accurate context throughout the season.
In his reporting, Félix regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical reference. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. He holds a bachelor’s degree in International Studies.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment








