Q36.5 looking to bolster support of Tom Pidcock with signings of Van der Poel & Evenepoel domestiques
CyclingMonday, 12 May 2025 at 15:00
Tom Pidcock has enjoyed a very successful start to life at the Q36.5 Pro Cycling Team, since leaving the INEOS Grenadiers over the off-season. One of the things potentially holding the Brit back in his quest to win a Monument however, is the difference in quality of the support around Pidcock as opposed to his leading Classics rivals.
In a bid to address this concern, the Q36.5 Pro Cycling Team are reportedly already being busy in the transfer market yet again. In looking for a better quality of domestique for Pidcock, the ambitious team are also eyeing some notable helpers from Mathieu van der Poel's Alpecin-Deceuninck and Remco Evenepoel's Soudal - Quick-Step, simultaneously strengthening Pidcock's support whilst weakening his rivals in the big one day races.
As reported by Het Laastse Nieuws in a Giro d'Italia rest day transfer update, both Xandro Meurisse and Quinten Hermans appear to be on their way out of Alpecin-Deceuninck, with both riders reportedly holding offers from Q36.5, with the team presenting an increasingly competitive and appealing sporting project. Also mentioned by HLN is that Yves Lampaert (Soudal - Quick-Step) has also held initial talks with Q36.5, suggesting the team is targeting experienced Belgian talent as it builds for the future.
Read also
🇮🇹 #GirodItalia
— Q36.5 Pro Cycling Team (@Q36_5ProCycling) May 12, 2025
On this first rest day of the @giroditalia we look back at the opening weekend in Albania with Tom Pidcock, Xabier Mikel Azparren and Mark Donovan.https://t.co/rZfEDgjWeM
📸 @SprintCycling pic.twitter.com/IFDPEKxkwJ
claps 0visitors 0
Write a comment
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- I think what Visma should be worried about is the way Pogi handled most of Vingegaard's attacks while staying in his seat in recent days. Everyone claims Pogi is fatigued at this point and Jonas is not. Maybe they're right - I don't know.Ride197424-07-2025
- That's too bad.Ride197424-07-2025
- It seems to me that there are so many "prophets" out there who claim "this is the end" for the race leader, especially if it's a multiple time TDF winner, that I'm wondering how it must have been when Armstrong was closing in on his 6th and 7th. I wasn't much into cycling during those years yet, so I don't know. Anyone remembers?Ride197424-07-2025
- Many of us may not like him and he's not always correct with predictions, but I think on average, his observations on what's really happening are more accurate than just about anyone else's. I know I'm making myself vulnerable here , but I think Lance reads races very well.Ride197424-07-2025
- That's a pretty harsh comment for your fellow riders! If he was better positioned for the sprint, he would be one of the riders that crashed... so then would he be one of those that prefer to crash rather than sprint? I think no one wishes to go down ever...Lobz7724-07-2025
- Ahhh! Bad luck, Carlos! Wishing you a speedy recovery! Another one of my top10 TdF 2025 prognostic abandons...Lobz7724-07-2025
- Trouble is, UAE is probably a one-way street, more interested in sucking up talent than selling it, must have used Bayern as a case study for how to right the competition ;-)Mistermaumau24-07-2025
- Also, yes other events have had success but the complications of the Tour are unique. The number of spectators vastly outweigh any comparable event, the variety of people too, locals, tourists, enthusiasts (this leads to far more feelings of being a priority “fan” compared to others than in stadiums or singular events where crowds feel more uniform, mentality like it’s my village, it’s my sport, it’s my holiday, others have less right to enjoy this here. The heating up by the caravan has to be analysed too, does it really create a better ambiance or does it stoke up tensions (I have seen grown men literally fighting over some stupid keyring from “territorial” catching rights, kids having crises (which boils over onto parents and then other annoyed bystanders because another caught more, someone hurt because one brand decided it would be cool to have youths (volunteering?) throwing hard drink cans into the crowd from a tall vehicle travelling at pro cycling speeds, anything can happen these days. Huge millions of people over thousands of km for 3 weeks, it’s as tough to prevent incidents as it is to stop riders crashing. Crowds don’t even mass up so closely at car rallyes (different perspective on dangers but still largely blind), you certainly couldn’t do a tdf for cars the way crowds are stationed, I think too many casuals who watch just don’t realise the speed of bikes (maybe too influences by tv scenes of mountain stages) and entourage who are in a frame of mind they have the whole visible surface to use. Far easier to avoid obstacles in F1. Far easier to fence people in in buildings. Far easier to control crowds that have to go through a gate or pay.Mistermaumau24-07-2025
- UAE is arrogant? Nils Pollitt clarified this, but as usual, this site omitted his explanation. He was telling the rider that the yellow jersey was having a nature break, and that it is an unwritten rule that attacks should be restrained under such conditions. Obviously, it is unfair to attack a rider who is peeing. The peloton also expect the yellow jersey team to control breakaways, so it is normal that UAE would reel in unwanted breakaways. These are racing situations not governed by hard and fast rules. Any rider or any team is free to go in front and take up the peloton pacing activity. It is unwarranted to label this as arrogant behavior. Tadej was merely expressing his opinion on the matter. As for the political stance of UAE, I don't think it is relevant, and media has a way of baiting sports figures to comment on matters unrelated to sports, in order to have something controversial to write about. Let us not allow ourselves to be fooled.FredMan24-07-2025
- Yes, you’re right though I don’t expect organisers to message subgroups individually with heavy campaigns. The problem in my opinion though is that people hear and understand the message but it’s forgotten as soon as their enthusiasm rises in the ambiance and they see others pushing limits more and more. Some of it is understandable and unavoidable but only because too many people no longer know how to hold back. The person in front moves forward to get a better view, so do you and the one behind, and then it starts all over again because everyone’s gain is cancelled out. Someone sticks their kid through to see better or raises them on their shoulder, same effect. Someone walks past and just stop right where they block your view, you move. People just aren’t thinking about the effect they have on their surroundings anymore and whether they are “perpetrator” or “victim” everyone feels justified and free to do as they feel and even when it leads to an accident they feel they had nothing to do with it, their actions didn’t participate in the build up.Mistermaumau24-07-2025