PRESS CONFERENCE | Lorena Wiebes shrugs away Flanders pressure after Middelkerke - Wevelgem victoy - "Especially the Oude Kwaremont..."
Cycling
Lorena Wiebes rode to victory at the Middelkerke - Wevelgem, a triumph based on climbing power, tactical prowess and sprinting ability. CyclingUpToDate was present at the post-race press confernce to hear what the Dutch champion had to say regarding her triumph.
Wiebes impressed by taking the victory in the Belgian classic based on a move, launched by herself, on the final ascent of the Kemmelberg. Whilst the Team SD Worx - ProTime rider can climb, the uphill efforts are usually the main obstacle in her path for the victories in the main races.
However in a great display of form she made the winning split and had enough in the tank to keep the five-rider group going to the finish, close the gaps in the late attacks and sprint to victory ahead of Fleur Moors and Karlijn Swinkels.
Read also
Wiebes: I started my sprint quite early, so that was also a small mistake. I could have waited a bit longer instead of going with three hundred meters to go. But with this finish line, you see it so long already that you want to go, and especially when you're at the front, you don't want them to come from the back, and you don't know who is in what position, so...
Question: But after the Amstel Gold race you said 'This is a mistake I only would make once".
W: Yeah, maybe one of them.
Q: Did you hear something in your ear, from the car maybe, from the team leader, that maybe you raised your arms too early?
W: Yeah, they said like, "Don't scare us next time".
Q: That's what they said?
W: Yeah.
Q: Is three hundred meters, is that too long for a sprint?
W: Yeah, normally it's too long, but yeah what I said with this finish it's also quite hard, especially when I was already all the time in leading or in the front pushing and keeping the speed a bit high. So then it's still quite a hard sprint. Sometimes bunch sprints can be easier than a sprint like this".
Read also
Q: If you compare yourself with the previous climbs on the Kemmelberg, it looked like you were stronger now than ever.
W: Yeah, I felt good from the beginning of the race. And yeah on one of the plug streets [field roads] I could follow Franziska Koch quite easily when she bridged to one of the front groups. Then I felt, "okay, legs are good." And then the first time Kemmel, I was like, "legs are still good."
And then on the Baneberg, they started early also with the attack. And then I was like, "I can still follow quite easily." And then we were away with this group of around fifteen riders, and that made it also a bit easier towards the second time Kemmel. And then I was like, "yeah, why not pace it myself and see what happens?" And yeah, and then I didn't realize directly that we had a group of... Yeah, that we were with a group of five.
Q: It was quite impressive, the Kemmelberg. Does that give you extra confidence towards Tour of Flanders? The big Paterberg in the final?
W: It will be different. It's different kind of climbs. They, they are of course longer also, especially the Oude Kwaremont. But I hope I will have a bit of the same legs next week, and that I can stay as long as possible in the front, of course. But yeah, today it felt good, and I'm happy with that.
Q: But it, it is a reference, right, the Kemmelberg. Or you don't agree?
W: Not fully agree, because also next weeks there are more hills. Different riders yea, Longo Borghini, Vollering, Niewiadoma, all riders that are pretty strong in this kind of races. So we have to see also. But I mean, we have alsp Lotte [Kopecky] next week there. So hopefully I can be one of the cards also still in the final. That's where I'm hoping for. Even if it's in a second group behind. But what I said, we need to see how the legs are next week. It can be that next week the, the legs are shit, so...
Q: But every year you make progression in Tour of Flanders so far. I think you could have established here [today] towards that race.
W: Yeah. I hope so. Um, yeah, it's... But I say it's really hard for me to say about next week how it will be because it's a different race... But today I was really happy, and also it, it gives you confidence of course to, to do a race like this and also still feel strong when you're pulling with the breakaway.
Q: After the effort of the Kemmel that you mean?
W: Yeah, to keep the gap, I mean of course we look to the power meter while turning in the breakaway and I had still had the feeling I had enough power to push. And I mean, it was hard when Gasparrini attacked in the final because I could not directly go, to try to close it, so it took some time. But then I knew also I need to pace it, so that was quite some effort. But yeah.
Q: Was there one moment you feel that "I will lose this race in the final"?
W: Well, I was more thinking, "Anyway, I need to close it." It's better to, to close it and then lose the race than one rider gets away and the peloton comes back or something, you know? Because that's also the thing, like we were not sure with the peloton. Yeah, it's always a bit hard for me to know because of course we get the information from the car, but still I, I haven't been in this so much, many times in this situation to see like how far is the peloton still.
Q: So you still had in mind to maybe sprint if the peloton comes back, or not?
Wiebes: Yeah. I was like, "that's not, not gonna work." I mean, with 10 k's to go, if they catch us back, it's different than with 3 k's to go because then we are like standing still when they pass us. So that's also why I needed to keep some speed in the group in the last kilometers.
Q: How well do you know Fleur Moors? Some of us were surprised that she wanted to sprint against you.
W: Yeah I think Fleur showed a really good progression this year. I mean, she's still super young and yeah she's doing really strong, also with these hills. Of course I knew her also that she was able to follow when I attacked and yeah, I think it's good to see young riders like Fleur becoming stronger and also yeah, it was... I think it was a good opportunity for her.
Q: What happened last Friday (correction: Thursday, ed.) in Bruges? Because you didn't win and everybody thought you should win also win that race.
W: That's part of sprinting ... that sometimes you get boxed in, and I don't want to crash riders out to get a gap, you know? So every door closed in front of me when I tried to move up. Every gap I saw, I tried to move up and the door closed again. That's also part of sprinting. It was a strange sprint there with not super high speeds. And I mean, we have made also mistakes in the lead outs. We discussed that afterwards. We looked to it, analyzed it and actually the plan was to do the lead out today better but things went a bit different.
Q: So that was the lesson you wanted to have... That was the lesson for today?
W: Well, it was extra motivation today to win again. No but I think sprints like in Bruges it keeps yourself sharp again and before the season we knew probably it will happen this season to lose a sprint. But it's more frustrating when you're not able to sprint, then you're beaten. If somebody gonna beat you when you can do the full sprint it's different.
Read also

Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- This is a really interesting idea, which, if well prepared could even be very successful. Very little money needs to be involved for a first season and any success could lead to rapid interest from sponsors.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- Hmmm, you seem to have a very convenient black and white view of things. Perhaps you haven’t been around much to discover how complex problems can become over time with people who know how to control, manipulate (or worse) others so gradually or subtly that you arrive at an irresolvable situation before you realise. This is how many inconveniences get introduced to the young, naïve, passionate or “desperate”, knowing they are not armed, protected or strong enough to defend themselves once it’s too late. Why do you think omerta culture is so widespread, why do you think so many people continue to go through so many awful things in life that others can’t understand anyone getting into? Life may be far more jolly for you but you would do well to understand (or reflect more on) the real world to refrain from being so quick to criticise those in a hard spot that may have genuine reason for speaking out.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- Seriously do you think when somebody gets into a serious accident, the ambulance is called by the hurt person?🤦 there is always a buddy system in place for a risky job. police , firefighters etc so that if someone gets hurt, the other call that in.abstractengineer07-11-2026
- I get the point totally. We live in the snowflake society where some riders forget they are getting paid to ride and get results. When they have a few issues they try to look outside of the real issue instead of themselves. It odd so many of the team are making no complaints and getting on with their job. If you do not like what you do find another job simples. Tough love as my mum would say.paultryan200207-11-2026
- many people advise him to grow slowly and rather do giro and/or vuelta instead of tdf. but i can totally understand that he is not satisfied with taking over once pogi declines, but instead beat him in his prime. so if he goes for tdf again, i‘m all for it. let‘s hope that pogi recovers soon!Ketterechts07-11-2026
- So gracious to offer something no-one would be prepared to pay for. The Giro is not the Tour and doesn’t command the same interest or attract the same “elite” (those willing to pay to be a part of something they consider has ego boosting potential). Roadside viewing will always largely remain free for everyone outside circuits. Introduction of a symbolic entrance to mountain climbs is worthy of exploration. Asking 1-2€ isn’t going to repulse real fans (most will spend 50-100€ on their outing that day all things included) but will prevent a portion of the total knobhead thrillseekers who will join in any large gathering as long as it’s free, just because they’re attracted to crowds, without which it it difficult for them to work up their anti-social behaviour.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- How is radio going to help when someone went over a cliff or bridge or off the roadside into a forest unnoticed and is laying there unconscious?Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- Yep, next we’ll be accusing F1 drivers of avoiding Le Mans.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- But on what is that opinion based? Are you holding him to a different standard than others? Are you saying he should do learn to like something he doesn’t Are you saying he hasn’t achieved enough Are you saying he pretends to be better than his results? It’s actually a really strange opinion to oust if you consider it objectively or rationally. Try applying it to others or yourself by asking if not EVERYONE should then be doing more? Nobody in athletics or swimming gets criticism for not expanding their repertoire when a rival or someone else does. In fact, most who move to another event get accused of running from their rival. Opinions are boring, the reasons behind them are what count.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- for a medical chief to throw things like is just bad. There are already radios which were banned for spectacle. allow radios. Gps trackers are not a complete solutionabstractengineer07-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment









