“They didn’t keep their word” - Einer Rubio and Giulio Ciccone throw mutual accusations after broken deal
Cycling
Stage 19 of the Giro d’Italia delivered a lot of GC action but amongst those who were aiming for the stage win, there was perhaps a bigger battle. Einer Rubio and Giulio Ciccone were chasing a stage win all Giro and looked in tremendous form. However, they seem to be coming out of it without a win and disappointed. Emotions escalated tremendously this Friday as the two accused each other of breaking an agreement they have made.
The duo were even together in front at a certain point in the stage, breaking away from the rest of the breakaway on the climb to Coi. But on the Passo Falzarego, the penultimate climb of the day, tensions escalated dramatically. Seemingly, Rubio struck a verbal agreement with the Lidl-Trek riders. And then it was broken.
“I agreed with Lidl-Trek to work together, let Ciccone win the mountains classification so he’d leave me the Red Bull Kilometer, but they didn’t keep their word. They wanted to be clever," Rubio said in a post-race interview.
It had not been clear what the reason for Rubio's protests against Derek Gee was at first, with the Colombian having no interest in the points classification or the overall classification - whilst the Canadian was actively seeking time in his bid for the race podium.
Read also
Agreement to split the bonuses
According to the Colombian’s account, they had agreed to divide the intermediate prizes. Rubio said he helped Ciccone lock down his KOM points on the promise that he would take the special sprint.
“We spoke with Ciccone: he’d take the KOM, and I even helped pull so I could then take the Red Bull kilometre, but they played smart and took both,” he said, visibly frustrated.
The Movistar climber did not hide his disappointment at the lack of camaraderie on the road and closed with a stark reflection on peloton ethics: “They don’t keep their word. It’s cycling, but sometimes you have to be human first.”
At the top of the climb, Rubio then sprinted to beat Ciccone, despite the classification being virtually sealed in the Italian's direction. This looked to be a move of revenge, not chasing the stage win or even Rubio's personal ambitions. Rubio now argued with Ciccone at the top of the climb, before Ciccone attacked on the descent.
Read also
Giulio Ciccone throws accusation back at Rubio
In words following the stage, Ciccone was also asked about the incident with Rubio, and he was not gentle on his words. Whilst the Lidl-Trek rider was able to climb into the lead of the KOM classification, his pursuit of a stage win at this Giro once again led to a disappointment, as was the case in all other stages for various reasons. This time around, he was caught with 2 kilometers to go with Sepp Kuss taking the win.
"Rubio got angry because he wanted the Red Bull Kilometers, but it was a thing for GC riders due to bonifications, I had nothing to do with that," Ciccone said. But then Rubio came back to 'steal' points from him at the top of the mountains. "He thought it was my fault," Ciccone believes.
"I did a mistake on KOM, I trusted him, but what he did was a pretty petty move," the Italian said in a war of words that is not common to be made public.

Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 5visitors 5
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- It would be great if the World Champion's jersey could be rotated among McNulty, Simmons, and Jorgenson. They threaded the needle perfectly. If each hadn't done exactly what he did, exactly when he did it, the race would have gone to one of the more heralded superstars. That said, how nice that this humble and hardworking guy gets his moment in the sun.
MarkFour07-11-2026 - This is a really interesting idea, which, if well prepared could even be very successful. Very little money needs to be involved for a first season and any success could lead to rapid interest from sponsors.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- Hmmm, you seem to have a very convenient black and white view of things. Perhaps you haven’t been around much to discover how complex problems can become over time with people who know how to control, manipulate (or worse) others so gradually or subtly that you arrive at an irresolvable situation before you realise. This is how many inconveniences get introduced to the young, naïve, passionate or “desperate”, knowing they are not armed, protected or strong enough to defend themselves once it’s too late. Why do you think omerta culture is so widespread, why do you think so many people continue to go through so many awful things in life that others can’t understand anyone getting into? Life may be far more jolly for you but you would do well to understand (or reflect more on) the real world to refrain from being so quick to criticise those in a hard spot that may have genuine reason for speaking out.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- Seriously do you think when somebody gets into a serious accident, the ambulance is called by the hurt person?🤦 there is always a buddy system in place for a risky job. police , firefighters etc so that if someone gets hurt, the other call that in.abstractengineer07-11-2026
- I get the point totally. We live in the snowflake society where some riders forget they are getting paid to ride and get results. When they have a few issues they try to look outside of the real issue instead of themselves. It odd so many of the team are making no complaints and getting on with their job. If you do not like what you do find another job simples. Tough love as my mum would say.paultryan200207-11-2026
- many people advise him to grow slowly and rather do giro and/or vuelta instead of tdf. but i can totally understand that he is not satisfied with taking over once pogi declines, but instead beat him in his prime. so if he goes for tdf again, i‘m all for it. let‘s hope that pogi recovers soon!Ketterechts07-11-2026
- So gracious to offer something no-one would be prepared to pay for. The Giro is not the Tour and doesn’t command the same interest or attract the same “elite” (those willing to pay to be a part of something they consider has ego boosting potential). Roadside viewing will always largely remain free for everyone outside circuits. Introduction of a symbolic entrance to mountain climbs is worthy of exploration. Asking 1-2€ isn’t going to repulse real fans (most will spend 50-100€ on their outing that day all things included) but will prevent a portion of the total knobhead thrillseekers who will join in any large gathering as long as it’s free, just because they’re attracted to crowds, without which it it difficult for them to work up their anti-social behaviour.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- How is radio going to help when someone went over a cliff or bridge or off the roadside into a forest unnoticed and is laying there unconscious?Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- Yep, next we’ll be accusing F1 drivers of avoiding Le Mans.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- But on what is that opinion based? Are you holding him to a different standard than others? Are you saying he should do learn to like something he doesn’t Are you saying he hasn’t achieved enough Are you saying he pretends to be better than his results? It’s actually a really strange opinion to oust if you consider it objectively or rationally. Try applying it to others or yourself by asking if not EVERYONE should then be doing more? Nobody in athletics or swimming gets criticism for not expanding their repertoire when a rival or someone else does. In fact, most who move to another event get accused of running from their rival. Opinions are boring, the reasons behind them are what count.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
Loading
4 Comments








