Luck of the Irish at ADAC Cyclassics Hamburg 2025! Rory Townsend holds on for dramatic win from the breakaway
Cycling
The luck of the Irish has shone on Rory Townsend this Sunday afternoon as the Q36.5 Pro Cycling Team star won in a dramatic finale to the 2025 ADAC Cyclassics Hamburg from the breakaway.
A four-man group of Dries De Pooter (Intermarché - Wanty), Johan Jacobs (Groupama - FDJ), Nelson Oliveira (Movistar Team) and Irish national champion Rory Townsend (Q36.5 Pro Cycling Team) broke free early to give the peloton something to chase. The bunch didn't seem too interested in chasing hard early on though, and as a result, the attackers' advantage at 80km to go was over five minutes.
The situation began to shift around 110km to go when Alpecin-Deceuninck, Soudal - Quick-Step, UAE Team Emirates - XRG, and Lidl-Trek moved to the front and began to work in earnest. Their tempo began to eat into the lead, bringing it down to 4:50, but the break responded with tenacity. Even as the chase continued, the gap briefly crept back out to 5:20, underlining the cohesion and commitment in the front group.
The race took a decisive turn as the peloton approached the second ascent of Waseberg — a short but explosive climb of 700m at 9.1%. The ramp sparked the expected tension and forced a selection in the bunch. Astana and INEOS Grenadiers moved up to fight for position, and the pace increase reduced the gap to the leaders to just over four minutes. The major shock came as Jonathan Milan — last year's runner-up and arguably the day’s top favourite — was dropped on the climb. The fast-finishing Italian couldn’t hold the surging tempo, effectively ending his chances with over 60km still to race.
Read also
Following the climb, a group of five riders — Mathias Vacek, Toon Aerts, Jonas Abrahamsen, Adrien Touzé, and Robert Stannard — attempted to bridge across to the leaders. They hovered around three minutes behind the break, with the peloton just 15 seconds further adrift. But despite their strong credentials, the group was eventually reeled back in by the bunch.
At the 50km mark, the breakaway’s lead had dropped to 2:10, but once again, the front quartet showed their grit. Over the next 10km, they managed to edge the gap back up to three minutes, defying expectations and keeping their hopes alive heading into the final climbs.
By the time the penultimate ascent of the Waseberg began, the break's lead was down once again to under two minutes. By the time the last ascent began at around 15km to go, it was less than a minute between the leaders and the chase. In the bunch behind, the likes of Vacek, Isaac del Toro and Paul Magnier came to the fore on the climb, causing a split.
Although things came back together, these accelerations had brought the break, now down to just 3 with De Pooter dropped, within 17 seconds at 10km to go. Still though, Oliveira, Townsend and Jacobs were proving difficult for the peloton to fully close down, stretching their lead back out to over 20 seconds with 5km to go.
By 3km from the finish line, the time gap had swung again with the peloton back to within 10 seconds. Had the bunch timed their chase to perfection, or had they left it a little too late?
The leader's were still clear inside the last kilometre, and in a thrilling finale, Rory Townsend kicked clear of his companions, holding off the sprint of the peloton to take arguably the biggest victory of his career ahead of
Read also
Results powered by FirstCycling.com

Félix SernaCycling Journalist
Félix Serna is a writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2025. He covers professional cycling across both the men’s and women’s calendars, with a focus on UCI rankings, race developments, and rider performance. His work includes interview-based reports, liveblogs, and tournament coverage designed to provide clear, accurate context throughout the season.
In his reporting, Félix regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical reference. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. He holds a bachelor’s degree in International Studies.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And yet, it attracts people, even you. What’s more, it attracts the rival fanboys to fill cyberspace with endless pointless my hero is better than your hero blabla that’s all been heard before and only helps sell the site as an advertising platform. You know what the solution is but most can’t resist. No different than women who follow and discuss celebs through gossip magazines.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- he is doing 460 watts for 35 min to achieve 7 w/kg with VO2 at 96 , just unreal numbers.abstractengineer08-11-2026
- Just do it, and put up with the consequencesJumpyjohn08-11-2026
- "was a headliner at the Tour de France" Nobody cared about Piddie. Only rivals that were there for Pogi, Jonas, Remco, Sexias, Lipo, Del Toro and they were all expected to lose. Piddie was not even in any conversation.abstractengineer08-11-2026
- exactly, he had an amazing season, but with these overstatements they don‘t do him good.Ketterechts08-11-2026
Loading
1 Comments








