"Juan Ayuso is far more of a serious Tour de France contender than Mattias Skjelmose will ever be” – Michael Rasmussen questions compatriot's criticisms of Lidl-Trek
Cycling
Former Danish star Michael Rasmussen has poured cold water on Mattias Skjelmose’s Tour de France ambitions, suggesting his fellow Dane will never reach the podium in Paris, particularly following Lidl-Trek’s high-profile capture of Juan Ayuso.
Speaking on Viaplay, the ex-pro argued that Ayuso’s arrival tilts the team’s long-term GC strategy away from Skjelmose, despite the 25-year-old having been told repeatedly by management that the squad would be built around him.
“There’s no doubt that Ayuso has more star quality than Mattias Skjelmose. He already has a stronger palmarès, and he’s two years younger,” Rasmussen said. “Ayuso is far more likely to be a serious contender for the Tour de France podium than Skjelmose will ever be.”
Read also
A blow to Skjelmose’s status
The comments come days after Skjelmose admitted to TV2 that he was unsure where the new signing left his own position inside Lidl-Trek. While maintaining that the team had always told him he was a central project, he acknowledged Ayuso’s pedigree made the leadership picture far from straightforward.
“Lidl-Trek told me they believe in me. I don't know how it relates to Ayuso coming in,” Skjelmose said. “They've been telling me for a couple of years that they want to build a team around me. But I don't think they brought him in as a domestique.”
He added that he was sceptical whether Ayuso, after leaving UAE Team Emirates - XRG in search of greater opportunities, would be inclined to ride in support of him. “We have the same goals. If he has some difficulty helping Tadej, then I don't know if he will want to help me in any way if it comes to that,” Skjelmose said. “But it could also be that he just didn't have a good time at UAE. I don't really know him, so of course I don't know what happened in that team.”
Giro opportunities instead?
For Rasmussen, however, the equation is simple: Skjelmose’s future lies away from the Tour. The former Danish champion pointed towards the Giro d’Italia as a more realistic target, while underlining that Ayuso’s ambition will dominate Lidl-Trek’s grand tour plans.
“In my firm belief, Mattias Skjelmose will never get close to a Tour de France podium. But if the startlist is favourable, he can certainly dream of finishing on the podium at the Giro d’Italia,” Rasmussen said.
Ayuso is widely expected to chase a Tour–Vuelta double in 2026, potentially opening the door for Skjelmose to lead elsewhere. In the meantime, his best chances to shine could come in the Ardennes, where he has shown consistent progress, while Ayuso has yet to make his mark.
Rasmussen’s blunt assessment may sting for Skjelmose, but with Lidl’s financial muscle raising expectations across the calendar, the Dane will need to prove quickly that he deserves equal billing alongside one of Spain’s brightest stars.
Read also

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 8visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Are you MrMauMau 2.0? Nothing you are saying is really relevant. Vaguely connected, but irrelevant. The conversation is whether Schreiber impeded Brand or not.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026
Loading
3 Comments








