Jonas Vingegaard on Roglic's Tour de France absence and Wout van Aert collaboration: "He has his own goals, I have mine"
Cycling
Jonas Vingegaard is heading to the Tour de France to try and defend his title. It'll be a tough task, but a possible one no doubt. He will have a very strong support in Jumbo-Visma including Wout van Aert once again, but not Primoz Roglic.
“I know Primoz has his program, he did the Giro, and I think it would be a lot for him to do the Tour as well. For now, I’m focusing on the team I have and I’m very happy with them," Vingegaard said in an interview with Cyclingnews. The Tour de Suisse will follow for Roglic, who will likely then prepare for the Vuelta a Espana and Il Lombardia.
Read also
Vingegaard will nevertheless have a luxury lineup behind him with Sepp Kuss and Steven Kruijswijk in the high mountains, and an insanely strong block of classics specialists in Wout van Aert, Christophe Laporte, Tiesj Benoot, Dylan van Baarle and Nathan van Hooydonck who will support him on the flat and hilly days, alongside providing a lot of room for tactical maneuvers.
“I’m pretty sure Wout will be where he has to be. he has his own goals, I have mine. He wanted to do the Tour de Suisse and I have to respect that, that’s his choice," he said on van Aert, who will not aim for the green jersey as he looks to arrive fresh at the World Championships that come afterwards. "That would be hard, we saw Wout stepped up last year already. He was on of my best helpers. If he steps up he’ll be a GC contender instead.”
Read also
As always Covid-19 remains a factor in the peloton, very much alight at the Giro where the team lost 3 riders before the race even started. Vingegaard is alive to the dangers: “For sure, it’s something have to be careful about, we were already careful last year, and now you get a bit scared seeing how it was in the Giro d’Italia. So I have to stay focused and try to not get sick."
Vingegaard has suffered a defeat on Pogacar at Paris-Nice earlier in the year, but he is keen on pointing out he does not feel the need for a revenge at what should be a balanced battle at the Tour. “You always try to improve it, you look back up see what went well and what didn’t then make it a better one. We’ve also tried it this year. I’d like to win it, but not as revenge for anything that happened before. I just like to do as well as possible every time.” And in July, of course, that won't be any different, either," Vingegaard concluded.
Read also

Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 2visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment










