"I think we will see a lot of beach racing handlebars to get around the rule" - Victor Campenaerts doesn't fully understand UCI's decision to ban inward brake levers

Cycling
Sunday, 07 January 2024 at 10:00
1127282867
Victor Campenaerts is not fully in peace with UCI’s decision to make a rule banning inward-facing brake levers in 2024 and he believes riders will simply use loopholes to achieve a similar position with flared bars, often used in beach races.
"It's quite difficult. Because the rules are very unclear," said Campenaerts to Cyclingnews ahead of Lotto-Dstny’s 2024 team presentation. "It seems like if you want to, you can ride with beach race handlebars and still ride with your brake levers like this. It makes no sense at all."
"I do understand that people think, or see the danger of riders riding with brake levers like this, but it was not banned for a long time. Now they ban it but they also don't ban it," said Campenaerts.
"I think the result will be that we will see a lot of beach racing handlebars in the peloton to just get around the rule. To me, it's simply a bullshit rule."
claps 1visitors 1
5 Comments
User Avatar
StardustDragon 08 January 2024 at 12:32+ 1653

Why they adding this to the rules?

Mistermaumau 25 February 2024 at 19:27+ 3572

Safety, and it makes a lot of sense during a race, I would have differentiated (if that’s at all possible) between a race and an ITT though where the rider is only really endangering himself.

JoshuaCharter 25 February 2024 at 15:37+ 47

I don't like this rule at all. If they ban turned in levers above like 15° then that's fine i guess but not straight. Straight is less comfortable

ike2112 25 February 2024 at 15:39+ 0

I had a pro bike fit and he turned mine in about 5 degrees as it's how my body is; it's stupid to make a blanket rule on a bike part which should have some tolerance.

Mistermaumau 25 February 2024 at 19:21+ 3572

It’s stupid to criticise a rule for not allowing something it does. There is a 10 degree tolerance, just like speed radars have a tolerance.

The problem is exactly the same, there are people that will tell you the limit is too low or ridiculous (personally, I agree but when I see how some others drive, it’s better for everyone there is the rule) and that driving faster doesn’t increase the risk of an accident. Firstly they are only considering themselves and secondly not objectively. There comes a speed at which even they will admit it gets dangeorus but risk doesn’t suddenly jump from 0 to 1 at a limit, it increases progressively and that is why rules are made, because someone has to decide that limit and anyone who doesn’t wish to respect it does so knowing the penalties.

I’ve read some ridiculous arguments, obviously very few people think things through and even less try things out (in the situation the rule is intended for) in order to see for themselves.

After that, the benefit of the position is very much overestimated (because it isn’t measured in situ but theoretically (just like your promised and real-life car mpg) and for some reason, a most ridiculous figure is the one most now claim in arguments for doing being allowed to use it; 25W gain at 40km/h for narrowing the handlebar width 2cm, haha.

Just in

Popular news

Latest comments