"I have to admit I had quite a bit too much to drink" - Mathieu van der Poel's Paris-Roubaix bidon thrower apologises in first public comments
Cycling
Last Sunday's incredible battle at Paris-Roubaix 2025 saw some fiery riding on the bike. It was one instant of an overzealous crowd member over-stepping his boundaries that dominated the post-race talk though, as race-winner Mathieu van der Poel was attacked by a 'fan' at the roadside, who threw a full bidon right into the face of the Alpecin-Deceuninck leader.
Now, in an exclusive interview with HLN, the culprit (who remains unnamed ed.) and his lawyer, Peter Desmet have addressed the public for the first time, apologising to Van der Poel for his actions in the process.
“Of course, my first and foremost intention was to apologize to Mathieu van der Poel personally,” begins the bottle thrower's apology. “I’m so incredibly glad that, despite my stupid action, he still managed to cross the finish line first on Sunday. But at the same time, I realize I owe an apology to every rider and every cycling fan out there.”
Read also
Somewhat unsurprisingly, it turns out alcohol had played a part in the idiotic actions. “We arrived around 11 a.m. We had a few drinks in the tent nearby while waiting for the riders to come through the section we were standing at," he recalls, admitting that the amount of drink consumed had clouded his judgement considerably. "And yes, I have to admit I had quite a bit too much to drink.”
The fact that the bidon thrown was yellow and seemingly a Team Visma | Lease a Bike bottle did lead some to believe that it was a rogue Wout van Aert fan attempting to help his hero. This though, proved far from the truth. “Out in the grass between the tent and the cobbled road, I saw a yellow bidon lying there. It was probably thrown away earlier by one of the junior riders," he explains. "Without thinking much about it, I picked it up. It wasn’t completely full, but there was still some liquid inside.”
“Mathieu van der Poel approached, and as he passed, I made that stupid decision – I threw the bottle. Why did I do that? I’ve been asking myself that question over and over again, and I still don’t have an answer. It was just a terribly foolish impulse. I can't explain it any other way. Was I a fan of Wout van Aert trying to sabotage his rival? Absolutely not – I don’t even have a favourite rider,” he continues, revealing the immediate regret he found afterwards. “I felt awful the moment it hit him. Within half a second I already regretted what I had done. On the one hand, I was so relieved he didn’t crash. But why did I do that? How could I have been so stupid? What’s going to happen to me now?”
“That one stupid second has landed me in the middle of an enormous media storm. It feels like everyone’s talking about me. I know I was wrong and I’ll take responsibility, but I really hope things can calm down soon,” concluded the bottle thrower's address.
Finally, lawyer Peter Desmet made a comment on the legal side of the matter. “My client will take legal responsibility,” he insisted. “Of course, we would prefer to resolve this privately, but he also understands that people want to make a point of principle. The incident happened in France, while both the accused and the rider live in Belgium. That makes things legally complex. But we will accept whatever consequences follow.”
Read also
Whoever threw this bidon at Mathieu van der Poel, I hope you get identified and spend some time behind bars tonight. 🙏 #ParisRoubaixpic.twitter.com/Hqns9kP4xz
— Benji Naesen (@BenjiNaesen) April 13, 2025

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 5visitors 5
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- the 'No different than women who follow and discuss celebs through gossip magazines' comment was unfortunately a bit off. didn't you just boast about your principles in the comments section of another article?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- Are you MrMauMau 2.0? Nothing you are saying is really relevant. Vaguely connected, but irrelevant. The conversation is whether Schreiber impeded Brand or not.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026
Loading
2 Comments








