Florian Vermeersch sees Tadej Pogacar's start at Paris-Roubaix as his own advantage: "We can complement each other perfectly"
Cycling
It's been written in the stars since last year, but now it's been finally made official that world champion Tadej Pogacar would make his baby steps at the last Monument he hasn't ridden yet. Paris-Roubaix therefore promises to provide fans with an extra layer of entertainment compared to normal years. And as is usual for the UAE Team Emirates - XRG leader, he'll be in France there for one reason - to win.
"I've known for a while that he was thinking about participating and that the chances were quite high. So it's not really a surprise to me," grinned Florian Vermeersch at Sporza.
Read also
What are his initial thoughts? "I'm happy that Tadej will be at the start. That can also be an advantage for me. For me it's perfect," the runner-up from 2021 Paris-Roubaix said several times.
However, the news could also have an unpleasant side effect. Is Vermeersch now losing his status as a potential leader? "Annoying? No, you can make it that way if you want. I really don't have a problem with it. If I have good legs and if I can ride the final, then we can complement each other perfectly. I have a free role anyway. I'm not the big leader, that's Tadej. But I don't think I have to ride on duty. I'm pretty sure about that."
Vermeersch leaves little doubt about it. Pogacar should be able to score immediately on April 13. "I think he will definitely compete for the prizes. When I hear how fast he went during the reconnaissance, he will definitely be in the mix if there is no bad luck."
With three previous participations at the Hell of the North, Vermeersch could be used as a reference point by the Slovenian. "No, he hasn't asked for tips yet. I haven't spoken to Tadej personally about it yet." That is easily explained since there are also other important races on the menu. "The focus was initially on Milan-Sanremo, but next week we will gradually start talking about it.”
Read also

Ondrej ZhasilCycling Journalist
Ondřej Zhasil is a cycling journalist at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2023. He is based in Ostrava, the third-largest city in the Czech Republic, and covers professional cycling across the main UCI competitions, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España. A key focus of his work is startlist analysis and pre-race coverage, where he examines team selections, rider line-ups, and tactical scenarios ahead of major events.
Alongside WorldTour coverage, Ondřej has developed specific expertise in junior cycling and in racing across East Asia, including competitions in China and Japan. He also maintains a broad working knowledge of other disciplines and levels, including cyclocross, while continuing to expand his understanding of mountain bike racing.
Ondřej holds a bachelor’s degree in Mathematics and Physics, which supports his analytical, data-driven approach to performance and race analysis. In his reporting, he regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment








