Dutch and Belgian press hail Jumbo-Visma's unprecedented run of success - "Jumbo is slowly starting to make it a trademark"
Cycling
Jumbo Visma had a remarkable performance at Gent-Wevelgem, with Wout van Aert selflessly giving the win to his teammate Christophe Laporte, leading to diverse reactions. The Belgian and Dutch press are extensively covering the team's success.
“It is looking more and more like only Mathieu van der Poel can stop Jumbo-Visma,” De Telegraaf wrote in the headline. It further read, “Van Aert will desperately need Laporte - but also Van Baarle, Benoot and the rest of the team - to keep Van der Poel and Tadej Pogacar off him in De Ronde. After Friday's E3 Classic clearly showed that no one is capable of following this super trio when the accelerator is fully depressed, Jumbo-Visma will probably try another way to keep MvdP and Pogi behind them.”
Read also
Algemeen Dagblad highlights the exceptional performance of the Dutch cycling team, who have secured victories in several races such as Omloop Het Nieuwsblad, Kuurne-Brussel-Kuurne, the E3, and Gent-Wevelgem. “Unprecedented scenes for races at this level. Although Jumbo is slowly starting to make it a trademark,” it wrote in the article.
The Belgian newspaper shared a similar view, but their coverage was more centred on Van Aert than his team. “As the epitome of sportsmanship, it can count, giving away a win in a top-class classic to a teammate. Because there is no doubt: Van Aert was the best between Gent and Wevelgem - the Kemmelberg never lies,” writes Het Laatste Nieuws.
Read also
“The most punishing thing of all is that you almost start to find it logical,” finally writes Het Nieuwsblad. It continues, “No Van der Poel and Pogacar at the start, and so Jumbo-Visma can grab overall power again. Two days after the collective supremacy in the E3 had briefly waned, the rant about the not-so-invulnerable Jumbo-Visma may already end.”
While they acknowledged the Belgian's performance, they also had some doubts about whether it was fair for him to gift the victory. “You might even find that questionable - and not unjustifiably so. After all, as the strongest rider in the race, is it really that smart to just give away a race like Gent-Wevelgem? All very generous and kind, but aren't you taking your palmares very lightly? But it does say everything about the strength of the collective and the overwhelming dominance of Jumbo-Visma: that in a one-two punch you can and may decide who crosses the line first.”
Read also
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment








