Again only 90 cyclists in road races of the 2028 Olympic Games despite heavy criticism: "It's ridiculous, because you're not going to get all the best riders at the start"

Cycling
Friday, 11 April 2025 at 07:00
faulkner and dygert olympivs 2024
For the 2024 Olympic Games, the number of cyclists in men's race was cut down to only 90 riders - to equal the number of starters in women's race. That decision was a bitter pill to swallow especially for the strong traditional countries like Netherlands and Belgium. However no change is planned for the 2028 Games in Los Angeles, is clear from the event programme.
And while Remco Evenepoel benefitted from this freedom to secure an Olympic double, not many shared the excitement. The fact that the major cycling countries were only allowed to take a limited number of riders to the Games led to criticism from, among others, Wout Poels, who would not make the Dutch selection.
"I think it's ridiculous what they did with the number of places," the Dutchman told GCN in December 2023. "I saw that even breakdancing is Olympic these days... I actually had the feeling that cyclists have been focusing more on the Olympic Games in the last ten years. It's a shame that they are now making rules that mean the peloton consists of only ninety riders."
"It's ridiculous, because you're not going to get all the best riders at the start. Instead, you have all these countries with no cycling history. They bring riders to the start who can't even follow for ten kilometers. It's a nice Olympic idea, but it doesn't really work. A peloton of ninety riders takes away some of the shine from the race."
claps 0visitors 0
1 Comments
Mistermaumau 11 April 2025 at 16:04+ 3501

Yeah, sorry, you said it yourself, it’s the Olympics, not a WC, not a Tour, not a monument, not a team event, not a cycling gala.

A once every 4 year event to bring nations together to celebrate the diversity of sport, so what if breakdancing has been included instead of 30 more cyclists who are paid pros? Know your Olympic history, remember drawing? The whole reason of the Olympics is for mainstream public to discover sport they rarely notice, for sports to showcase themselves to public that doesn’t usually watch and in order for athletes from lower ranked nations to participate with the elite for once. The US (now Jamaïca) have known this problem since dominating sprinting but there is no solution, you cannot resolve the Celebrate every nation vs Have only the best equation, it has to be a mix. Already nations with more than 1 cyclist have an advantage, being able to work as a team. As for those countries that can’t keep up, all the better for the elite’s chances, don’t knock it, and sorry but if you allow a Kiesenhofer to win gold, you don’t deserve any medal as an elite. The races have been fine with those that took part, just improve so you make your national selection, if you don’t make that, you don’t really deserve a medal anyway do you?

Just in

Popular news

Latest comments