"A true thoroughbred doesn't hold back": Patrick Lefevere previews Paris-Roubaix showdown between Pogacar and Van der Poel
Cycling
Over the past two decades, Soudal Quick-Step has conquered the cobblestones of Paris-Roubaix six times. However, the well has run dry for The Wolfpack in recent years. As the Hell of the North approaches, former team boss Patrick Lefevere admits the drought is simply down to the overwhelming dominance of two men: Tadej Pogacar and Mathieu van der Poel.
"Like sheep to the slaughterhouse"
Lefevere has no illusions about the current hierarchy in the peloton, acknowledging that Pogacar and Van der Poel currently stand head and shoulders above the rest. While he believes Pogacar is looking better than ever, he offered a blunt assessment of how the Slovenian's rivals capitulated earlier this spring.
"His performance in the Tour of Flanders proves that [he is better than ever]," Lefevere explained to Le Soir. "I am a bit more reserved about Milan-San Remo, because when he crashed with his rivals before the Cipressa, no barrage was thrown up by the race directors; the riders were able to come back between the team cars and nobody attacked. They were led to the slaughterhouse like sheep."
The Tour of Flanders told a vastly different story. UAE Team Emirates-XRG blew the race wide open, paving the way for the World Champion to arrive solo in Oudenaarde. However, Lefevere expects a completely different tactical dynamic on the brutal cobbles of Paris-Roubaix.
Read also
"Pogacar will not systematically profit from the support of his main rival, Mathieu van der Poel, as he did in Flanders," Lefevere noted, before defending the Dutchman's willingness to work with his greatest rival. "A support system that has been wrongly criticized by some, because a true thoroughbred doesn't hold back; it's a point of honor. You can't sit in the wheel of the best rider and beat him in a sprint without having done a turn at the front yourself."
If Van der Poel manages to match Pogacar pedal stroke for pedal stroke on the cobbles, he traditionally possesses the faster sprint. So, does Pogacar need to drop his rival before the finish? Lefevere has his doubts.
"I don't know if he really has to drop him. Maybe it's better to settle the matter on the velodrome. Neither Mathieu nor Tadej has much experience on the track. After a race like that, freshness is the most important thing."

This was Paris Roubaix's podium last year
The Wolfpack's tactical blueprint
With these two riders commanding the spotlight, what can we expect from Soudal Quick-Step this Sunday? Lefevere pointed to the promising form of Jasper Stuyven, who is still building his condition after an early-season illness.
"I saw a very good Jasper Stuyven in the Tour of Flanders," Lefevere stated. "He rode very intelligently, stayed at the back and took the front maybe twice. And he finished as the 'best of the rest', in sixth place. He was sick at the beginning of the season, so he still needs to improve a bit."
Meanwhile, Dylan van Baarle, brought in specifically as a co-leader for the cobbled Classics, lacked the legs to follow the decisive moves in Flanders. To succeed in Roubaix, Lefevere believes the team must leverage the contrasting racing styles of their two leaders.
"Where Jasper often relies on his brains, Dylan is capable of attacking where you least expect it. Ideally, the Dutchman would end up in the breakaway, allowing Jasper to follow, and they would later find themselves in a two-man lead in the finale."
Read also

Félix SernaCycling Journalist
Félix Serna is a writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2025. He covers professional cycling across both the men’s and women’s calendars, with a focus on UCI rankings, race developments, and rider performance. His work includes interview-based reports, liveblogs, and tournament coverage designed to provide clear, accurate context throughout the season.
In his reporting, Félix regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical reference. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. He holds a bachelor’s degree in International Studies.
claps 2visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- again, nothing is going to be resolved. it is a discussion board. I simply said I didn't see how MS impeded LBs sprint. the UCI doesn't care about my thoughts, and I am really not that emotionally invested in it.mij09-11-2026
- provoke change, lol. this is a discussion board. nothing is going to change by what I say here. just commenting that it didn't look like MS impeded Brand. beyond that not trying to go too deep.mij09-11-2026
- as excellent as maga rednecks chloe dygert (and quinn simmons)?Ketterechts09-11-2026
- so what i understand is: i left a comment calling out the endless author CVs for being an unnecessary flex of expertise, and you responded by lecturing me (and others) on discrimination and value systems. hats off to you. you definitely lost me!Ketterechts09-11-2026
- I just love the flood of Americans into the top ranks of world cycling. In addition to being studs on the bike, they all seem to be excellent emissaries for our country.Occam09-11-2026
- ANATOMY OF A G.O.A.T. EDDY MERCKX about TADEJ POGAČAR: Merckx: “He has revived a style of cycling that we had almost forgotten. He is now better than me.” Key statements by Merckx about Pogačar in 2026: - Acknowledging his superiority: This time, Merckx openly admitted, without any subsequent backtracking or reservations, that Pogačar had surpassed him and was now above him. This contrasts with 2024, when he quickly softened his remarks about Pogačar being faster. - The possibility of a historic triple (Giro, Tour and Vuelta): During the July Tour de France (where Pogi claimed his fifth title), Merckx stated that Pogi was the only cyclist in history capable of winning all three Grand Tours (the Giro d'Italia, Tour de France and Vuelta a España) in a single season, provided the conditions were right and he had sufficient team support. - Lack of serious competition: Merckx emphasised that Pogačar has no real rivals in the mountains since 2024, thanks to his extraordinary climbing ability and the fact that he continues to improve despite still being under 28 (he turned 28 in autumn 2026). - Praise for his racing style: Merckx highlighted how Pogačar is bringing back the aggressive, uncompromising spirit of cycling's golden era, when races were not merely about calculated stages and tactical conservatism, but about attacking from long distances. PS: This is not "boring" ... this is called making real history, not only statistical history. Capish?PogiSloFans09-11-2026
- It’s off-season mate, I’m bored and fed up with the mediocrity of people unwilling to provoke change when they admit things aren’t right. What have you done lately to make anyone realise you won’t put up with things? What conversation, are you dictating to me which part of the incident I have to be interested in or telling me other parts are taboo? That’s what I guess the UCI would really like, let them moan, let it blow over for them pass on to the next thing, let’s keep the status quo, let’s try our best not reviewing or revealing anything about decision-making just like every time before, they’re used to it by now so we can take the risk they’ll never give us grief.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- As far as CUTD headlines go this is far from the worst. It helps if you look at it twice and realise it’s a list of descriptions from distinct events. You can’t deny the reality of being a rival if you consider the picture immediately below, frontrunner is unfortunate but I’m guessing this time it’s more a linguistic failure than a clickbaiting opportunity. Just a reminder that this is not an anglo website, for those who find it too tedious to interpret text to get the gist of things which are rarely of great importance (as opposed to eg purposely biaised DOJ extradition translations in order to achieve hidden agendas), there are plenty of anglo cycling websites google can suggest.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Ah, finally someone willing to be a bit proactive.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- So? Do you understand the way instructions, decisions and authority work? Do you think in a football match if after a match (or even after play has gone on) a player tells the referee he did touch the ball with his hands when the referee didn’t award opponents a penalty that they will revise the score or force a replay? You really don’t get my point, it’s not against the rider but everyone here is so emotional for her they can’t get back to an issue which needs resolving for the future and the first step (or maybe second) is to try to understand how and why it happens, none of you have contributed in the least to that. All everyone is interested in is letting everyone know they agree how unjust it was, not even sure anyone thinks that could affect anything.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment










