Emma Norsgaard

Latest comments

• abstractengineer19-10-2026
  how it is "We’ve taken another big step forward for next year" he just lost in lombardia to a 20 year old, and two 30+ year olds. and not even top 10 for WCRR.
• abstractengineer19-10-2026
  This is similar to Lebron. first he said i need to consult my family , my daughter, need respectable money blah blah blah and then dont care about family , dont care about money, only onion rings, am off to Philly, very very far from family. Off season should be with family more, no?
• mij19-10-2026
  I hope he comes back strong for a proper battle with Tadej
• mij19-10-2026
  congrats to a great career and good retirement.
• 

  Brucegel19-10-2026
  Any artificial product should be reported.Any team that doesn't should be stripped of wins and fined.I know that this level of transparency does not and will never exist.All anyone can do is continue to test riders on a regular and surprise basis.If the test comes back clean then all any of us can assume is the rider is clean.
• Hills3319-10-2026
  Also, it's supposed to be hard to gain an advantage from drafting off Remco because he is so aero.
• Pogboom19-10-2026
  How would stats back it up? You realise tactics involved could mean Vine saved his legs for a faster finish? Some riders can choose to go all out and fade later in the ride, others can hold steady state the whole way, and others can have a reserved start and power up later in the ride. You can't judge just by the stats unless you have power data to be able to prove Vine is riding faster even though he is putting out the same or less power (suggesting drafting). I'm sure the stats prove that Vine didn't cheat because UCI would monitor the stats to make sure this exact scenario doesn't happen (and disqualify them for drafting if the stats proved it).
• Jumpyjohn19-10-2026
  Only one person would say such a thing here. Sorry to burst your bubble but I’m afraid that window of opportunity has now closed. You can beat some of the people all of the time and all of the people some of the time but you can’t beat all of the people all of the time.
• Jumpyjohn19-10-2026
  Both prizes are actually pathetic, almost amateur like, not even covering the cost of participating
• Jumpyjohn19-10-2026
  It depends on how you define doping and you would do well to give your definition so we can see how against it you are. If you consider the use (as a hypothetical example) of a new beneficial artificial product unknown to anti-doping agencies ok without considering asking them if it would constitute doping if you told them about it then we’re never going to agree on who could be or couldn’t be doping and according to what threshold, moral, statistical, legal, comparative. In football even financial doping is now considered