Niels Albert: "I was shocked when I heard Wout van Aert's winter program"
Cyclocross
Wout van Aert will soon be back in cyclocross action. Only racing six races though, the Team Visma | Lease a Bike star's much-reduced calendar has left some notable names in the sport disappointed.
"I was shocked when I heard Wout van Aert's winter program," admits cyclocross legend Niels Albert in his column for HLN, surprised at just how few races the Belgian superstar will be appearing at over the coming months. "Six races, that is very little. Even less than I had expected."
Alongside Mathieu van der Poel and Tom Pidcock, Van Aert forms part of the 'Big 3' of cyclocross. Multi-discipline stars who swap the road for the field every winter, usually with much success. As Van Aert announces a calendar of only six races and with the festive period approaching and still much uncertainty surrounding the programmes of Van der Poel and Pidcock, the presence of the 'Big 3' is set to be much more limited this winter.
"Wout says that the content of this campaign is one out of love for the sport," Albert continues. "Of course he will also collect nice starting fees and the choice between certain races depended on supply and demand, but the fact that he only rides six races proves that money has not taken the upper hand."
Albert also doesn't seem to have fully given up hope of Van Aert extending his winter. "With Benidorm and Maasmechelen, he will ride one World Cup round in the two weekends before the World Championship,” he concludes, asking the question of a possible Rainbow Jersey challenge. “Is there a chance that, depending on his feeling in those two races, he will give the green light for the World Championships after the second team training camp? The World Championships are taking place in Northern France and that offers opportunities.”
⏱️ You've all been waiting for this ...
— Team Visma | Lease a Bike (@vismaleaseabike) December 6, 2024
Here's Wout cyclocross calendar pic.twitter.com/fDRBqj1hYr
I am shocked by this kind of statement, the guy had crashes, injuries and hezlth issues, what do you expect him to do, dive straight back into the deep end unprepared? Also before passing judgement on the « few » races some stars will do, some of these guys should go and do a full road season at the same level. Easy to say when you only do 4-5 months of short cyclocross races every year.
Hmmm... As every winter I'm waiting for battles between Matje-Woutje-Pidders. Wout at least said that he'll start a few times. Pidcock probably won't start at all. And MvDP... I still have a hope. MvDP! Please make this winter great again!
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Far more tension than expected, the other teams really worked Pogacar over as much as can be expected, they kept getting away and getting caught, and he launched later than I thought he would. And still, here is Monument 8, he’s now won at least twice in every one he has won. Excellent job for Pederson and Ganna amongst all the other results. What a race!RidesHills06-04-2025
- If you throw 2 identical golf balls at the same speed, but one is twice the weight, it will go a bit farther (wind resistance is the same, so the amount of energy of the heavier ball is higher). If you throw 2 identical golf balls at the same power, but one is twice the weight, it will go less far (the amount of energy is the same, so the lighter one is going faster). Remember that in a flat TT, once up to speed, the amount of weight is basically negligible (except a tiny amount of increase in rolling resistance). It's all power vs CdA. Probably the best way to think about this is with a truck (with a covered bed) over a flat but very bumpy road, and ideal tire pressure for the weight. Now, load the truck up to 3X the mass, change the tire pressure to the new ideal pressure, and do the run again. What will take the most amount of power? It's quite obvious that it's the run with the more mass. (Many of us have done this test in real world conditions without realizing it.) Why? Because there's deformation loss to the tire, which is somewhat worse when there's more mass, but there's also the loss from having to lift that much more weight over and over again.acem8206-04-2025
- ...Cause cycling at this level is always about the compromise of weight vs power. Pogacar could be stronger at a higher power, but his power to weight ratio would suffer. All else held equal is very important to understand they physics here, but that's *never* how cycling actually works.acem8206-04-2025
- The truth is already out pendejo and you were caught.
MrCampy06-04-2025 - So why did Tadej say, in an interview, when he won Flanders and was asked if he would try Roubaix next, that he would need to gain more body weight before he thinks of Roubaix? Tadej weighs 25 lbs. lighter than MVDP, last I checked.FredMan06-04-2025
- This is a race Brandon McNulty can win if his form has improved. I'll be pulling for him.awp06-04-2025
- I don’t know how generalised it is but in every race in every country I’ve participated in you either need to show a club licence (which you only get by having a medical around every 2-3 years) or by having a doctors’ aptitude certificate. Can’t ask for much more. Don’t forget, 15000 people (of which quite some are well into the latter part of life), that’s a small town where people will have medical issues every day even without cycling hard. In one country I lived in you even have to do a full ECG and power test regularly to ride competitively after 50.Mistermaumau05-04-2025
- Before or after their kids get married to each other ;-)Mistermaumau05-04-2025
- Ok guys, both of you, this is far too complex to debate as a whole as there are dozens of variables and none of the conditions have been rigidly defined, what’s more, everyone is looking at things from a different angle and for a different purpose so let’s go back to the real basics first to see if we can agree on some starting principles. If you throw a golf ball or ping pong ball (assuming same size here) at the same speed in the same direction, which is going to land further? Ditto if you launch them with the same power? If two identical riders of 70 and 80kg (lets assume the extra 10kg is just bones and drinks and lunch) on identical bikes ride side by side at speed X with zero wind (or alternatively a really strong head wind) and both stop pedalling at the same time, which is going to roll further or come to a stop sooner? The wind force does inevitably come into play but I want to keep an open mind as to the effect it has in situ in practice because it obviously isn’t the only criteria and with acem82’s example it’s highly likely that wind is more minor but that wouldn’t be true for every real-life situation. Regarding cobbles, that’s an extremely complex motion to analyse, you can call it bouncing or hopping or climbing or what you like but in reality it’s indescribable and only high precision analysis can tell you exactly how much of each effect is contributing for each rider at each speed and every tire pressure/behaviour, you will NEVER manage to say that one criteria alone governs the whole efficiency equation.Mistermaumau05-04-2025
- Medical test should be mandatory before participationabstractengineer05-04-2025