Mathieu van Der Poel storms to victory at Azencross Loenhout as Wout van Aert struggles on return
Cyclocross
Mathieu van Der Poel has won the 40th edition of the Azencross Loenhout, beating Thibau Nys and Laurens Sweeck as Wout van Aert could only manage fourth.
In the first meeting of the cyclocross season between Mathieu van der Poel and Wout van Aert, it was the Dutchman who came out on top with a strong display as van Aert struggled in his first race since his crash in the Vuelta as he suffered several incidents throughout the race.
At the start, it was Wout van Aert who led in to the first corner, but a small mistake on the first lap gave his rival Van der Poel the chance to build an early and ominous looking lead. Things then begun to unravel for the Belgian as he fell on lap 2, and lost 17 seconds to the leader.
Either Van der Poel or Van Aert have won each of the last 7 editions of the race, the last rider other than the big two to win the race was Tom Meeusen in 2015. After 4 laps, van Aert was riding with Thibau Nys, 18 seconds behind Van Der Poel who was 7 seconds ahead of Laurens Sweeck in second. Heading in to the sixth lap, van Der Poel began to stretch his legs and the gap to second place grew to 13 seconds.
But then van der Poel showed that he was human as he crashed on the sixth lap, giving the chasers a glimmer of hope of catching him. Yet with 1 lap to go, he led by 32 seconds from Sweeck, who had been joined by Nys and Van Aert. Van Der Poel surged further clear, as Nys beat Sweeck and Van Aert missed the podium.
Next up will be the World Cup Besancon, which Mathieu van der Poel won last year. Van der Poel will be in action there again on the 29th, but Wout van Aert will miss that race out.
Results powered by FirstCycling.com
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 4visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment