“What happened in Milan should never happen again” - Giro organisers draw line under Jonas Vingegaard neutralisation row before Rome finale
Cycling
The Giro d’Italia will not allow the Rome finale to become another Milan. That was the message from race organisers after the stage 15 neutralisation row, with RCS Sport insisting the final stage circuit in the Italian capital is safe, familiar and set to be raced as planned.
The controversy in Milan began when Jonas Vingegaard and other riders raised concerns during the stage, prompting discussions with the race convoy before general classification times were eventually frozen with 16 kilometres remaining. The decision protected the GC riders, but it also left a chaotic image at one of the Giro’s marquee city finishes.
Race director and safety manager Stefano Allocchio has now pushed back strongly against any suggestion that Milan should become a precedent for Rome.
“What happened in Milan should never happen again,” Allocchio told Cycling News. “The Milan circuit was safe.”
RCS refuse to reopen Rome debate
Rome is due to host the Giro finale on the same circuit used last year, giving organisers a key argument against any late challenge from the peloton. “The Rome circuit is exactly the same as last year, so the riders and teams know it and have raced on it,” Allocchio said.
The safety debate has followed the Giro deep into its final week, but RCS’ position has hardened. Milan was treated as a compromise in the moment. Rome, they argue, is different.
Allocchio accepted that riders have a right to raise safety concerns, but questioned where the line should be drawn if sprint stages are repeatedly challenged during the race itself. “I understand the riders have concerns about safety, but what are we going to do? Never have sprint finishes?” he said. “We accepted the riders’ request in Milan, and they thanked us, but it won’t happen again.”
For Vingegaard, the final weekend should be about completing his Giro victory and adding the maglia rosa to his Tour de France and Vuelta a Espana titles. Instead, the Milan row has left another debate running alongside the fight for Rome: how much control riders should have once a stage is already underway.
“The vibe flopped”
The Milan decision did not only frustrate organisers. Brent Copeland, the Jayco-AlUla team manager and AIGCP president, said the episode damaged the spectacle for people watching from outside cycling’s usual bubble.
“RCS had done a great job organising everything for the Giro to return to central Milan,” Copeland told Cycling News. “There were a lot of special guests and partners who were all invited to the race on Sunday. Everyone was watching, but then the last lap was neutralised, the vibe flopped.”
The confusion was immediate. The race continued, but the GC fight had effectively been removed from the final circuit. For seasoned cycling fans, the distinction was messy enough. For guests, sponsors and potential investors, Copeland said it was even harder to follow.
“People were asking me what was going on,” he said. “I tried to explain, but people thought it was like the Safety Car in F1, even though the race continued. There were people there who could be interested in investing in the sport, and suddenly they were confused about what was going on. At the end of the day, cycling suffered last Sunday in Milan.”
Paul Magnier has emerged as the premier sprinter at the 2026 Giro d'Italia
Sprint finish or rolling negotiation?
The row has left the Giro with an awkward question before Rome. Riders want greater influence over safety. Organisers want decisions made before the flag drops, not after the race has reached the city centre.
Copeland pointed back to the 2007 Giro, when rider protest also disrupted the race, and said cycling has still not found a clean way to handle these flashpoints. “It’s now 17 years later, and a similar thing happened, so we’ve not learnt from it,” he said.
His preference is for earlier discussions and clearer agreements before the peloton reaches dangerous or contested sections. “Discussions about safety on specific stages need to take place before the race, and let’s communicate things better,” Copeland said. “Let’s not destroy cycling’s image, with riders going back to the car during the race and no one understanding what’s going on.”
“I really encourage the GC riders to get together before the race and certain stages to agree to stay out of trouble, but let the race go on and let the sprinters do their race,” he added.
That is now the pressure point for Rome. The maglia rosa should be settled by then, the sprinters will want their final stage, and RCS have no appetite for another mid-race stand-off. Milan left the Giro with a safety argument and an image problem. Rome is where organisers want the racing to take the final word.
Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 10visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- This is a really interesting idea, which, if well prepared could even be very successful. Very little money needs to be involved for a first season and any success could lead to rapid interest from sponsors.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- Hmmm, you seem to have a very convenient black and white view of things. Perhaps you haven’t been around much to discover how complex problems can become over time with people who know how to control, manipulate (or worse) others so gradually or subtly that you arrive at an irresolvable situation before you realise. This is how many inconveniences get introduced to the young, naïve, passionate or “desperate”, knowing they are not armed, protected or strong enough to defend themselves once it’s too late. Why do you think omerta culture is so widespread, why do you think so many people continue to go through so many awful things in life that others can’t understand anyone getting into? Life may be far more jolly for you but you would do well to understand (or reflect more on) the real world to refrain from being so quick to criticise those in a hard spot that may have genuine reason for speaking out.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- Seriously do you think when somebody gets into a serious accident, the ambulance is called by the hurt person?🤦 there is always a buddy system in place for a risky job. police , firefighters etc so that if someone gets hurt, the other call that in.abstractengineer07-11-2026
- I get the point totally. We live in the snowflake society where some riders forget they are getting paid to ride and get results. When they have a few issues they try to look outside of the real issue instead of themselves. It odd so many of the team are making no complaints and getting on with their job. If you do not like what you do find another job simples. Tough love as my mum would say.paultryan200207-11-2026
- many people advise him to grow slowly and rather do giro and/or vuelta instead of tdf. but i can totally understand that he is not satisfied with taking over once pogi declines, but instead beat him in his prime. so if he goes for tdf again, i‘m all for it. let‘s hope that pogi recovers soon!Ketterechts07-11-2026
- So gracious to offer something no-one would be prepared to pay for. The Giro is not the Tour and doesn’t command the same interest or attract the same “elite” (those willing to pay to be a part of something they consider has ego boosting potential). Roadside viewing will always largely remain free for everyone outside circuits. Introduction of a symbolic entrance to mountain climbs is worthy of exploration. Asking 1-2€ isn’t going to repulse real fans (most will spend 50-100€ on their outing that day all things included) but will prevent a portion of the total knobhead thrillseekers who will join in any large gathering as long as it’s free, just because they’re attracted to crowds, without which it it difficult for them to work up their anti-social behaviour.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- How is radio going to help when someone went over a cliff or bridge or off the roadside into a forest unnoticed and is laying there unconscious?Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- Yep, next we’ll be accusing F1 drivers of avoiding Le Mans.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- But on what is that opinion based? Are you holding him to a different standard than others? Are you saying he should do learn to like something he doesn’t Are you saying he hasn’t achieved enough Are you saying he pretends to be better than his results? It’s actually a really strange opinion to oust if you consider it objectively or rationally. Try applying it to others or yourself by asking if not EVERYONE should then be doing more? Nobody in athletics or swimming gets criticism for not expanding their repertoire when a rival or someone else does. In fact, most who move to another event get accused of running from their rival. Opinions are boring, the reasons behind them are what count.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- for a medical chief to throw things like is just bad. There are already radios which were banned for spectacle. allow radios. Gps trackers are not a complete solutionabstractengineer07-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment