"We all say things that we might regret 24 hours later" - Bradley Wiggins defends Evenepoel after intense quotes on teammate Lipowitz
Cycling
The tensions at Red Bull - BORA - hansgrohe have been one of the most prominent stories of the Tour de France throughout its opening days, culminating with Remco Evenepoel's criticism of his own teammate Florian Lipowitz on the Col du Tourmalet stage. Lance Armstrong, Bradley Wiggins and George Hincapie have discussed the situation.
Right after the end of stage 6, the Belgian spoke out to Belgian media with a very strong tone. On the final climb to Gavarnie, there was a less-than-ideal collaboration in the Evenepoel group which got him frustrated, and it didn't help when his teammate Florian Lipowitz didn't respond in the way Evenepoel had wanted.
“I asked for a lead-out and I didn’t get it. I think I was rightly angry. In the Tour of Catalonia, I rode on the front for thirty kilometers, now I ask him to ride one kilometre on the front and that doesn’t happen. That did make me angry, yes. That needs to be discussed properly tonight.”
The words quickly gained traction and the tension between the Red Bull - BORA - hansgrohe block looked to have grown to the level many feared. At the start of stage 7 the duo and several staff members talked about a talked and resolved situation, however it is something that has left a mark in the Tour's opening week.
“Johan [Bruyneel] sent this to us on WhatsApp, and I simply could not resist responding. I wrote back ‘whiner extraordinaire'," Lance Armstrong said on The Move podcast. “Johan replied ‘former football player’, which is true".
Remco Evenepoel during the ongoing Tour de France
Wiggins argues Evenepoel talked in the heat of the moment
It is not the first time that Remco Evenepoel has had such moments following races; whilst at the Tour de France's pre-race press conference, he responded in a less positive way to several questions from the journalists - with a similar tone.
Bradley Wiggins, who has spent many years in a similar position in the peloton, understands his fellow Olympic Champion's situation: “We have all experienced those frustrations immediately after the finish, when things that were supposed to happen did not happen".
"What I would say in Remco’s defense is that, within a few minutes of crossing the line, a microphone is immediately put in front of his face.” Nevertheless, the statements left a negative mark on the team, whose tactics and ability to cooperate strongly have been put into question.
Wiggins believes that Evenepoel likely regretted his words following the stage. “At a moment like that, we all say things that we might regret 24 hours later. Unfortunately, that is part of the sport," he argues.
"The problem for Remco is that a quote like that is immediately on the front pages the following day. It instantly adds fuel to all the stories that were already circulating about him before the start of the Tour".
Read also
Tour de France's high-pressure environment might have triggered Evenepoel
Quite possibly, this also happened due to the natural tension that builds up throughout the Tour de France, from the stressful days before the race including the large press conference; to the daily media tasks that surround the race itself.
It has happened in the past that Evenepoel shares his true thoughts on the microphone, but according to George Hincapie, there are things that are best left to discuss internally - not with the media.
“Yes, you probably should not say something like that. You can be angry, but you absolutely should not say it publicly," the former American pro argues.
"He rode on the front for Lipowitz throughout Catalunya, so from that perspective, he had a point. But some of his frustration also came from the fact that the cooperation in that group was not working properly.”
Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- ANATOMY OF A G.O.A.T. EDDY MERCKX about TADEJ POGAČAR: Merckx: “He has revived a style of cycling that we had almost forgotten. He is now better than me.” Key statements by Merckx about Pogačar in 2026: - Acknowledging his superiority: This time, Merckx openly admitted, without any subsequent backtracking or reservations, that Pogačar had surpassed him and was now above him. This contrasts with 2024, when he quickly softened his remarks about Pogačar being faster. - The possibility of a historic triple (Giro, Tour and Vuelta): During the July Tour de France (where Pogi claimed his fifth title), Merckx stated that Pogi was the only cyclist in history capable of winning all three Grand Tours (the Giro d'Italia, Tour de France and Vuelta a España) in a single season, provided the conditions were right and he had sufficient team support. - Lack of serious competition: Merckx emphasised that Pogačar has no real rivals in the mountains since 2024, thanks to his extraordinary climbing ability and the fact that he continues to improve despite still being under 28 (he turned 28 in autumn 2026). - Praise for his racing style: Merckx highlighted how Pogačar is bringing back the aggressive, uncompromising spirit of cycling's golden era, when races were not merely about calculated stages and tactical conservatism, but about attacking from long distances. PS: This is not "boring" ... this is called making real history, not only statistical history. Capish?PogiSloFans09-11-2026
- It’s off-season mate, I’m bored and fed up with the mediocrity of people unwilling to provoke change when they admit things aren’t right. What have you done lately to make anyone realise you won’t put up with things? What conversation, are you dictating to me which part of the incident I have to be interested in or telling me other parts are taboo? That’s what I guess the UCI would really like, let them moan, let it blow over for them pass on to the next thing, let’s keep the status quo, let’s try our best not reviewing or revealing anything about decision-making just like every time before, they’re used to it by now so we can take the risk they’ll never give us grief.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- As far as CUTD headlines go this is far from the worst. It helps if you look at it twice and realise it’s a list of descriptions from distinct events. You can’t deny the reality of being a rival if you consider the picture immediately below, frontrunner is unfortunate but I’m guessing this time it’s more a linguistic failure than a clickbaiting opportunity. Just a reminder that this is not an anglo website, for those who find it too tedious to interpret text to get the gist of things which are rarely of great importance (as opposed to eg purposely biaised DOJ extradition translations in order to achieve hidden agendas), there are plenty of anglo cycling websites google can suggest.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Ah, finally someone willing to be a bit proactive.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- So? Do you understand the way instructions, decisions and authority work? Do you think in a football match if after a match (or even after play has gone on) a player tells the referee he did touch the ball with his hands when the referee didn’t award opponents a penalty that they will revise the score or force a replay? You really don’t get my point, it’s not against the rider but everyone here is so emotional for her they can’t get back to an issue which needs resolving for the future and the first step (or maybe second) is to try to understand how and why it happens, none of you have contributed in the least to that. All everyone is interested in is letting everyone know they agree how unjust it was, not even sure anyone thinks that could affect anything.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Shouldn’t you be in MOUrning?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Maybe you don’t like it and that’s fine, we all have different sensibilities and topics that touch us, but as you try to show me, it doesn’t hurt to reflect and compare ourselves to others behaving similarly. What precisely is the difference between a sports fan interested in every detail of his/her hero’s life and a celeb fan having the same hobby? It’s far more interesting to learn and think about how and why (which) people do things than reading about what they are actually doing. And just to add another level, maybe you’ll agree we don’t use the same value system for everyone, we discriminate in an enormous number of systematic ways. For example, when is the last time you saw a discussion arguing about the achievements of two politicians to compare or for that matter two business leaders apart from the comparison of hypothetical wealth accumulated? Perhaps you misunderstood the intention?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- I don’t think I know what’s beneath the surface but I am willing to think about it, discuss it, compare it to a known past, extrapolate to a potential future and ask/try to find out truth or even take action within my powers (boycotting something or someone is within EVERY person’s reach). If you think your attitude has more chance of changing a result, a process, a system or an institution or it just makes you feel good, keep at it but to me it looks like you’ve already given up before trying.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- All journalists should start asking the UCI uncomfortable questions, sending inquiries about the interpretation of the rules and the justification of the results. This is the only way to change anything.averagecyclist09-11-2026
- how else is there to look at things? we are responding to words and pictures, we are not there. your long winded replies make zero sense to anyone. pretty much everyone but you says the same thing. MS was robbed. somehow you think you're so smart to dig beneath the surface and discover something no one else, including the opposing coach and cyclist, saw. lol. you are a tool.mij09-11-2026
Loading
3 Comments