“She’s been out of the sport for three years. That’s always going to catch up with you" - Van Vleuten unsurprised by Van der Breggen's Tour de France Femmes disappointment
Cycling
As the Tour de France Femmes exploded on the slopes of the Col de la Madeleine, one of the most surprising casualties was Anna van der Breggen.
The SD Worx - Protime leader, back in the peloton after three years away from racing, was among the first GC contenders to crack on the final climb. Yet, if there was any disappointment in the Dutch camp, there was also perspective – especially from former Tour winner Annemiek van Vleuten.
Speaking on De Avondetappe, Van Vleuten said she wasn’t shocked to see her long-time rival and compatriot lose time. “Honestly, I didn’t expect her to be up there fighting for the podium,” she said. “Maybe she could’ve surprised us, but in truth, we’ve already seen her having to ride her own pace early on in climbs this year. So no – it’s not a huge surprise.”
Read also
“Three Years Away – That Will Cost You”
Van der Breggen ultimately lost more time than any of her fellow GC hopefuls, unable to match the blistering pace set by Pauline Ferrand-Prévot and her pursuers. But Van Vleuten, never one to sugarcoat the demands of elite racing, pointed to a clear reason behind the performance dip. “She’s been out of the sport for three years,” Van Vleuten said matter-of-factly. “That’s always going to catch up with you during a stage race. Your body just doesn’t recover as well when it hasn’t been through those repeated efforts for a few seasons.”
Van der Breggen, a former Olympic and World Champion, retired from professional racing at the end of 2021 and only returned to competition this season. While her comeback has been met with both fanfare and expectation, Van Vleuten was quick to remind viewers that rebuilding top-end form isn’t something you can rush. “That recovery capacity – that endurance – it’s something you only get from laying down a base and doing long blocks of back-to-back training,” she said. “She’s still in the middle of catching up on that.”

Van der Breggen has shown glimpses of her former self since returning in 2025
“She’ll Be a Different Rider Next Year”
Despite the setbacks, Van Vleuten expressed full confidence that Van der Breggen would return to a much stronger level in 2026. “It’s just a matter of time,” she said. “By next year, I think we’ll see a completely different Anna – she’ll have erased most of the deficit and be much further along. This year is all about rebuilding. What comes next will be far more telling.”
With Van der Breggen now out of GC contention, attention turns to her role in supporting teammates like Lorena Wiebes – a role she’s already fulfilled with quiet effectiveness earlier in the race.
Whether she returns to full leadership in future editions remains to be seen. But if Van Vleuten’s prediction is right, Van der Breggen’s comeback story may still have its defining chapters ahead.
Read also

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And yet, it attracts people, even you. What’s more, it attracts the rival fanboys to fill cyberspace with endless pointless my hero is better than your hero blabla that’s all been heard before and only helps sell the site as an advertising platform. You know what the solution is but most can’t resist. No different than women who follow and discuss celebs through gossip magazines.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- he is doing 460 watts for 35 min to achieve 7 w/kg with VO2 at 96 , just unreal numbers.abstractengineer08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment







