PREVIEW | ZLM Tour 2024 stage 2 - Gerben Thijssen big favourite for sprint stage
CyclingWednesday, 05 June 2024 at 20:24
The ZLM Tour is scheduled from June 5th to June 9th this year. This Dutch race has gained popularity as a key preparation event leading up to the Tour de France, offering numerous opportunities for sprinters to vie for victories in preparation for their main objectives. Here's a preview of stage 2.
The first set bunch sprint of the race. First of four. Stage 2 starts in Middelburg and finishes in Wissenkerke, 193 of pan-flat roads with a finale just at sea level.
Stage 2: Middelburg - Wissenkerke, 193.9 kilometers
Prediction ZLM Tour 2024 stage 2:
*** Gerben Thijssen
** Max Kanter, Casper van Uden
* Jakub Mareczko, Gleb Syritsa, Enrico Zanoncello, Giovanni Lonardi, Sasha Weemaes, Simon Dehairs, Manuel Peñalver
Pick: Gerben Thijssen
Read also
claps 0visitors 0
Write a comment
Just in
Play for FREE! Fantasy Paris-Roubaix
Apr 11, 10:20
0
Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter today!
Apr 06, 15:11
0
Popular news
Latest comments
- A great great race with the expected outcome, more or less. Wow these two are dominant. They’ve won the last 7 monuments, and van der Poel has won two each year for 3 years. They are tied at 8, and Pogacar has two left where he is the favorite. It’s unfair to the rest but that was a slug fest of a race. So fun to watch.RidesHills13-04-2025
- By the way, try to specify details a little deeper next time, I know lengthy text is unpopular but often it’s very useful, like to distinguish between a cobble having the effect of many little hills or a cobbled section :-)Mistermaumau13-04-2025
- Sorry thenMistermaumau13-04-2025
- They made the mistake of asking Kopecky to wait for Lorena and also work for her. Typical Sdworx fail. Kopecly should have been sole leader with Lorena playing foil like Vismaabstractengineer13-04-2025
- these french guys are such petty jealous whiners i can’t stand Madiot.mij13-04-2025
- More crying from a failing team boss with no winsCrashjames13-04-2025
- (I was really replying to the other person...) In Paris Roubaix, the bits with the cobbles are slower than the paved sections, so wind resistance is less than it otherwise would be on a "flat" road, though as I keep pointing out, these are equivalent to a bunch of little hills. While momentum will help one maintain velocity given resistances, you aren't taking into account that one had to get that extra mass up to speed in the first place, which costs more power. So, you do get back most of the extra power you've put in, but that's not helpful. The less rolling resistance (and climbing over the bumps) of less mass will always be more helpful than having more mass, all else held equal. Actually, this could be easily demonstrated with a cyclist on cobbles, 2 runs, start at the same velocity, do the same power, have a backpack full of foam on run 1, then full of rocks on run 2 (ensuring the PSI was perfected for both) and see which run went faster. And when we think about it, we know which one will be faster intuitively.acem8213-04-2025
- Yes, you did say that but what is the point of stating the obvious when obviously a lighter rider won’t be able to avoid reality which is that above a certain speed rolling resistance becomes insignificant compared to wind resistance, so it pragmatically all things being kept equal is irrelevant for them in their task. Momentum is what you’re left with after overcoming resistances, and that’s what going to help you keep up your speed except on a longer hill where weight will slow you faster.Mistermaumau13-04-2025
- Yes ok, but then what were the exact details then, did he cross the line, did his team not ask the stewards committee if they thought it was an exceptional case? He got the time but not the ranking, not even the last ranking, which suggests it was looked at and decided but explain why you feel it wasn’t right? There are only two cases it doesn’t apply, team time trials and summit finishes, so flat or not makes no difference.Mistermaumau13-04-2025
- Rolling resistance goes up with weight. Also, I did specify "all else held equal".acem8213-04-2025